Impacted Third Molar Tooth Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of the Use of Dexamethasone and Diclofenac Sodium in Immediate Post-Operative Care in Third Molar Surgery
The investigators will select 30 patients with symmetrical impaction of third molars, according to Pell and Gregory dental impaction classification, who would be submitted to two surgical procedures, right and left, and in both surgeries dexamethasone 8 mg was administered in the pre-surgery phase, and the use of dexamethasone (12 mg/day) for 3 days on one side and diclofenac sodium (150 mg/day) for 3 days on the other side was continued, in a randomized, double-blind and cross-over trial so that all patients acted as control of themselves (split-mouth). Other drugs used in postoperative period, rescue analgesic and antibiotic therapy will be identical for all patients. The analyzed variables will be the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), total number of consumed analgesics, swelling and trismus (objectively), which were statistically analyzed by means of Student's t-test.
STUDY DESIGN
Clinical double-blind, randomized, split-mouth trial. This study was submitted to and
approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of Hospital Geral de Vila Penteado under
CAA Protocol: 34824714.8.0000.5446.
MASKING AND RANDOMIZATION
To ensure that the patient, the main researcher, the surgeon and the statistician were
unaware of what drug would be used postoperatively, dexamethasone (4 mg) and diclofenac
sodium (50 mg) were prepared in capsules of the same color and size, stored in similar vials
and coded as drug No. 1 or drug No. 2. The drugs used in different procedures were disclosed
only after acquisition and analysis of all data. The randomization procedure will be
performed by a researcher not involved in the evaluation of patients and surgeries, using
sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. Each envelope had the combination of drugs to be
used in the postoperative period, protocol 1 (with 1 drug) or protocol 2 (drug 2) and the
side of surgery (right or left). For each enrolled patient, the researcher not involved in
patient assessment and surgery opened the envelope, will inform the main researcher of the
protocol to be used postoperatively, and the surgeon of the side to be operated. The second
surgical procedure was performed on the contralateral side, using another medical protocol
postoperatively, with an interval of two months between procedures. Thus, the patient, the
surgeon and the main researcher did not know which medical protocol would be used
postoperatively.
The methodology of this study sought to follow the rules of the new CONSORT 2010 Statement.
SURGICAL PROCEDURES AND DRUGS
Five minutes before surgery, patients will receive pre-operative drugs
(Cefazoline1g/Dexamethasone 8 mg/100 ml of 0.9% saline solution) intravenously.
With the patient in the supine position on the operating table, the surgeon perform the
extra and intra oral antisepsis with chlorhexidine 0.2% and anesthesia of the inferior
alveolar, lingual, buccal, posterior superior alveolar and greater palatine nerves
respecting the protocol described by Malamed, with lidocaine 2% and epinephrine 1:100,000,
with a maximum volume of 9 ml. Initially, an incision was made at the alveolar crest along
the mesial or distal aspect in the mandibular branch to reach the distolingual region of the
second molar, followed by intrasulcular incision surrounding the second molar to the
interdental area between the second and first molar. Afterwards, the surgeon will raise the
mucoperiosteal flap, perform an osteotomy procedure (with a high speed engine, spherical
surgical drills No. 8, conical drills 702, with copious irrigation with saline solution
0.9%), tooth sectioning of the crown and/or roots (with a high speed engine, zecrya surgical
drill with copious irrigation and saline solution 0.9%) when indicated for the case, tooth
dislocation, dental avulsion, curettage and filing and copious irrigation of the cavity with
saline solution 0.9 %, absorbable polyglactin 910 suture (Vycril 4.0 - Ethicon Johnson &
Johnson do Brasil Ltda. - São Paulo). Then, the surgeon will make an incision was made in
the jaw tuberosity along the mesial to distal aspect in order to reach the distolingual
region of the second molar, followed by intrasulcular incision surrounding the second molar
to the interdental area between the second and first molar, raised the total mucoperiosteal
flap, ostectomy (with chisel gouge), tooth luxation, dental avulsion, curettage and filing
and copious irrigation of the cavity with saline solution 0.9%, absorbable polyglactin 910
wound suture. The duration of the surgery was noted in minutes from the time of completion
of the first anesthesia to the time of final suture.
POST-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
After surgery, the researcher in charge will give instructions for local hemostatic
measures, nutrition, wound cleaning, physical exertion restriction, dosage and gave the
drugs to the patient according to research protocol.
Protocol 1: Amoxycillin (500mg) 8/8 hours for 7 days, drug 1 8/8 h for 3 days and as rescue
drug, in case of pain, Dipyrone (500mg) that could be consumed within 4 / 4hours.
Protocol 2: Amoxycillin (500mg) 8/8 hours for 7 days, drug 2 8/8 h for 3 days and as rescue
drug, in case of pain, Dipyrone (500mg) that could be consumed within 4 / 4hours.
CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS
For both sides, the elapsed time of the surgical procedure will be recorded, which started
at the time of the anesthetic puncture and complete at the end of the last suture.
The pain will be measured from an analog scale from 0 to 10 corresponding to: 0 = no pain, 1
and 2 = MILD, (easily tolerated), 3 to 5 = MODERATE (tolerable discomfort), 6 to 8 = strong
(discomfort difficult to tolerate) and 9 to 10 = VERY STRONG (unbearable), besides the pain
score annotations at pre-set times (immediate postoperative period, 4 and 8 hours
postoperatively).
The patient filled a control file where the total number of tablets consumed within 72 hours
was recorded.
The swelling will be assessed by comparing the values of three facial lines: (1) the
distance from the lateral corner of the eye to the gonial angle of the operated side; (2)
the distance from the bottom edge of the tragus to the commissure of the mouth on the
operated side; (3) the distance between the lower edge of the tragus to the soft pogonion of
the operated side (Figure 1). In three different times, evaluating the preoperative values
(time 1) with postoperative values 2nd day (time 2) and 7th day (time 3) after surgery,
measured by the third researcher.
Trismus will be assessed by comparing the values of the distance between the incisal edges
of the upper and lower central incisors measured by a millimeter ruler. In three different
times, evaluating the preoperative values (time 1) with postoperative values 2nd day (time
2) and 7th day (time 3) after surgery.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06023524 -
The Effectiveness of Laser Acupuncture and Standard Medication Therapy on Mandibular Post-Odontectomy Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02547896 -
Effectiveness of Diclofenac and Its Association to Codeine After Lower Third Molar Extraction.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05684601 -
Impact of 3D Intraoral Scanning on Postsurgical Evaluation of Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05170516 -
The Effect of Saline Irrigation at Different Temperatures on Pain, Edema, and Trismus After Impacted Third Molar Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02481700 -
Epidemiological Study on the Surgical Removal of Third Molars
|
||
Completed |
NCT05488028 -
3D Evaluation of Facial Swelling Post Impacted Lower Third Molars Surgery: RCT
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05679973 -
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polybutester Suture on Postoperative Complications in Lower Impacted Third Molar Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03741894 -
Examination of the Prevention and Treatment Modalities of Alveolitis in Relation With Impacted Teeth Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06017570 -
Risk Factors for Distal Caries of Second Molars Adjacent to Mandibular Impacted Third Molars
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03894722 -
Effects of Polyvinylpyrrolidone Iodine on Postoperative Trismus and Swelling During Impacted Third Molar Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02837614 -
Evaluation of Preoperative Submucosal Dexamethasone in Third Molar Surgery
|
Phase 0 | |
Completed |
NCT02831374 -
Effectiveness of Platelet Rich Plasma in Wound Healing
|
Phase 0 | |
Completed |
NCT02494856 -
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Naproxen, Associated or Not With Esomeprazol, in Lower Third Molar Removal
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02450487 -
Influence of Genotype of CYP2C9 on Clinical Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Piroxicam After Lower Third Molar Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05545553 -
Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments on Third Molar Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03619460 -
Clinical Efficacy of a New Piezoelectric Technique for Wisdom Teeth Extraction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05143359 -
Accuracy of Variables for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03784638 -
Comparison of Two Different Flap Designs for Bilateral Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03752255 -
Verbal and Visual Information Techniques on Anxiety in Third Molar Surgery
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04349579 -
Evaluation of the Effects of Irrigation of the Extraction Socket With Rifamycine
|
Phase 4 |