View clinical trials related to Impacted Third Molar Tooth.
Filter by:The purpose is to compare the effects of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments on postoperative pain, swelling, trismus and patients' comfort after mandibular third molar surgery.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lingually-based triangle flap design and buccally based triangular flap design on postoperative swelling, trismus pain after mandibular third molar surgery.
The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative anxiety levels using dental anxiety scale (DAS) and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between two point distance measurements performed by surgeon on patients face with foldable ruler, which is the most commonly used method, and the subjective scoring will be done by the patient with the help of the edema scale, for measuring edema.
Cross sectional observational study to assess the feasibility of using the functional prototype of the restful jaw support device to support the jaw when extracting mandibular 3rd molars using moderate/deep sedation. An additional meeting(s) will occur, after the oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMS) have completed all treatment procedures utilizing the device and surveys are completed, to provide feedback on how the device performed.
this study evaluates the effect of cold application after impacted third molar extractions. Patients have bilateral impacted third molar tooth included in this study. Patients do not applied cold after extraction of third molar on one side and applied cold cold after extraction of third molar on the other side.
The investigators set out to develop a clinical trial in order to test the topical use of hydrocortisone as a intraoperative irrigant solution. As this route of administration as well as being low cost and not add new steps to the surgical procedure, can contribute to an improved quality of life in the postoperative period of patients undergoing extraction of third molars.
The study composed of sixty patients, each of whom required surgical extraction of a single impacted mandibular third molar under local anaesthesia. The patients were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups of 20 each. The three groups were categorized as Group A (intramuscular dexamethasone), Group B (submucosal dexamethasone) and Group C (control). The objective measurements of facial pain, swelling, and trismus was performed by an independent examiner at baseline (preoperatively), and at days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively.
Purpose: This prospective randomized comparative clinical study was conducted to assess the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) gel on soft tissue healing and bone regeneration potential on lower third molar extraction sockets. Methods: For the study, 50 Patients (37 male, 13 female) requiring surgical removal of a lower impacted third molar and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited. The patients were categorized into two groups, Group A and Group B. For each group 25 patients were randomly allocated. The predictor variable in Group A was the application of PRP Gel whereas in Group B had no PRP. Postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, soft tissue healing and osseous regeneration was assessed using standard methods. These outcome variables were assessed on 1, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 14-postoperative day. Patients were recalled at the 4th, 10th, and 16th postoperative week for assessment of bone healing. The data were recorded and tabulated.
It will be evaluated the clinical efficacy of Diclofenac 50mg (NSAID) compared to its association with Codeine 50mg (opioid) administered in 50 patients requiring extraction of two third molars. After assessing the research parameters, a comparative data analysis, along with the proper application of statistical tests, will provide the basis for an evaluation of both efficiency medications used.