Hysterotomy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Barbed Suture: A Look at Its Use for Hysterotomy Closure During Cesarean Section
Verified date | January 2024 |
Source | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to see if patients whose uterine incision (hysterotomy), at the time of scheduled cesarean section, is closed with barbed suture, have less blood loss compared to women whose incision is closed with the standard suture (vicryl). The primary outcome is quantification of blood loss (QBL). Secondary outcomes include time for hysterotomy closure, need for additional hemostatic sutures, rate of endometritis, use of hemostatic agents, and differences in pain which will be assessed by a telephone screening in the days following delivery. Study participation will last 1 year and will include the following research procedures : 1. Randomization to barbed suture vs. standard suture 2. Collection of data for primary and secondary outcomes 3. Telephone survey 2 weeks following the procedure to assess pain, bowel/bladder habits, and evidence of wound infection. The barbed suture is approved by the FDA for use in soft tissue approximation and this is not an off-label usage.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 226 |
Est. completion date | January 8, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | January 8, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 64 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - All patients undergoing a scheduled primary cesarean section at Mount Sinai Hospital - age 18-64. Exclusion Criteria: - Multifetal gestations - Placenta previas - Pre-term patients - Patients with prior uterine incisions or a coagulopathy (DIC, Von Willebrands Disease, etc) - Patients undergoing an unplanned or emergency cesarean section |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai |
United States,
Greenberg JA, Goldman RH. Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(3-4):107-15. — View Citation
Pfuntner A, Wier LM, Stocks C. Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2010. 2013 Feb. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-. Statistical Brief #149. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK132428/ — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Quantitative blood loss | Quantification of blood loss (QBL) | Day 1, At delivery | |
Secondary | Time for hysterotomy closure | Time for hysterotomy closure | Day 1, At delivery | |
Secondary | Number of participants who need additional hemostatic sutures | Day 1, At delivery | ||
Secondary | Number of hemostatic sutures | Number of hemostatic sutures needed during procedure | Day 1, At delivery | |
Secondary | Rate of Surgical Site Infections (SSI) | Rate of SSI (any of superficial wound infection, deep wound infection, and endometritis) | Day 1, At delivery | |
Secondary | Rate of Surgical Site Infections (SSI) | Rate of SSI (any of superficial wound infection, deep wound infection, and endometritis) | 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Change in Pain score | Change in pain score at 2 weeks from baseline. Pain score from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating more pain.
Follow up pain assesment by a telephone screening 2 weeks following delivery. |
Day 1, At delivery and 2 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05103410 -
Impact of Aripiprazole on Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05150275 -
Study Comparing Classic Vaginal Hysterectomy to vNOTES Hysterectomy
|