Clinical Trials Logo

Hyperplasia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hyperplasia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01961102 Completed - Endometrial Cancer Clinical Trials

OSCAR ENDO One Stop Assessment of Risk for Endometrial Hyperplasia and Cancer

Start date: May 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

It is to be achieved that in postmenopausal women through the combination of Hysteroscopy and intraoperative rapid section a positive predictive value (PPV) regarding the objective illness like endometrial cancer or adenomatous hyperplasia of 100% so as a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%.

NCT ID: NCT01958892 Completed - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

To Compare Outcomes After Transurethral Enucleation of Prostate Versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Start date: n/a
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of the study is to assess whether transurethral enucleation of prostate gives better or equivalent outcomes compared to the gold standard of transurethral resection of the prostate

NCT ID: NCT01957189 Completed - Clinical trials for Prostatic Hyperplasia

This Will be an Open-label, Three-period, Fixed-sequence Study to Evaluate the Drug-drug Interaction, Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dutasteride and Tamsulosin When Administered Alone and In-combination in Chinese Healthy Male Volunteers. The Study Will Last Approximately Eleven Weeks. Blood Samples

Start date: October 25, 2013
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This will be an open-label, three-period, fixed-sequence study to evaluate the drug-drug interaction, pharmacokinetics and safety of dutasteride and tamsulosin when administered alone and in-combination in Chinese healthy male volunteers.

NCT ID: NCT01952912 Completed - Clinical trials for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate and Open Prostatectomy to Treat Large Prostates

Start date: January 2004
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators hypothesize that Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate (PkEP) might yield functional results comparable to OP but with lower perioperative morbidity, and have equivalent long-term efficacy with OP for large prostates. The first objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of PKEP compared to OP concerning Qmax at one year postoperatively. To explore the long-term efficacy, we compared the efficacy, safety, and morbidity of PkEP with those of OP in BPH patients with prostate glands larger than 100 g over a follow-up period of 6 years.

NCT ID: NCT01943058 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Megestrol Acetate or Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in Treating Patients With Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia or Endometrial Cancer

Start date: March 2014
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This randomized phase II trial studies how well megestrol acetate or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system works in treating patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial cancer. Progesterone can cause the growth of endometrial cancer cells. Hormone therapy using megestrol acetate or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system may fight endometrial cancer by lowering the amount of progesterone the body makes. It is not yet known whether megestrol acetate is more effective than levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in treating atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial cancer.

NCT ID: NCT01942551 Completed - Clinical trials for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Safety and Pharmacokinetic Interaction Study of Tadalafil and Dutasteride

Start date: September 2013
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This is an open-label, two-arm, one-sequence, cross-over study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic interaction after oral concomitant administration of tadalafil and dutasteride in healthy male volunteers.

NCT ID: NCT01939184 Completed - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Assess Safety & Efficacy of WC3055 in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Start date: August 2013
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of various fixed daily doses of WC3055 compared with placebo for the treatment of subjects with LUTS secondary to BPH.

NCT ID: NCT01937871 Completed - Clinical trials for Erectile Dysfunction

A Study of Tadalafil in Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Erectile Dysfunction (ED)

Start date: September 2013
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to see whether tadalafil can reduce the signs and symptoms in men with Erectile Dysfunction (ED) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BPH-LUTS) and improve their quality of life.

NCT ID: NCT01935752 Completed - Clinical trials for Fibromuscular Dysplasia

Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Fibromuscular Dysplasia

MeDyA
Start date: November 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Fibromuscular dysplasia is an non inflammatory non atherosclerotic obstructive arterial disease affecting mid-size arteries. It is considered as a rare vascular disease of unknown origin. Fibromuscular dysplasia may become symptomatic depending on location and severity of narrowing of the arterial lumen. for example,when a stenosis develops within a renal artery, arterial hypertension may develop. The cause of fibromuscular dysplasia is unknown. Several factors have been suggested to be associated with it: tobacco abuse or oestrogens. In order to progress into identifying possible causative mechanisms of the disease, we design a pathophysiology study destined to assess endothelial function in patients with fibromuscular dysplasia and to identify possible plasmatic biomarkers of the disease.

NCT ID: NCT01931605 Terminated - Clinical trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Results of Selective Prostatic Arterial Embolization in Patients With Indwelling Urinary Catheter Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Refractory to Medical Treatment.

Prost-EMBOL
Start date: May 2014
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Background: Patients with indwelling urinary catheter for chronic retention due to obstructive BPH refractory to medical therapy are candidates for prostatectomy still considered as the gold standard of treatment. Urinary tract infection, strictures, postoperative pain, incontinence, sexual dysfunction, anesthesiologist risk and blood loss are complications associated with surgery. Minimally invasive treatments were originally conceived as an attempt to offer equivalent efficacy without the burden and risk of operative morbidity. Recently, it was suggested that prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) to treat BPH might follow uterine artery embolization for uterine leiomyomas. Animal studies in pigs and dogs have shown that PAE is safe and can induce prostatic volume reduction. The first report of this technique in the management of BPH in humans was by DeMeritt et al, who reported a single case of BPH with obstructive symptoms and blood loss refractory to other treatments that was successfully managed by PAE with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles. Objective : We investigate whether PAE might be a feasible procedure as an alternative treatment option to treat urinary retention due to obstructive BPH. The primary objective is to evaluate the success rate of procedure defined when selective prostatic arterial catheterization and embolization were achieve and patients can be able to urinate after their urinary catheter has been removed. Patients and methods : A monocentric prospective study is undertaken in 25 patients aged 50-85 years who present with indwelling urinary catheter due to obstructive BPH refractory to medical treatment with a clinical indication for surgery who agreed to undergo PAE. The study is approved by the hospital ethical committee and an informed consent form for PAE as an alternative treatment is signed by all participants. Statistical analysis : The sample size has been calculated in order to have an estimated probability of success (corresponding of primary objective) of 50% (worst case) with 95% confidence intervals of 30 to 70. The two-sample t-test (and Wilcoxon rank-sum test) is used to compare the mean changes of the variables from baseline to 10, 30 and 90 days. Finally, the Chi-square test is used to test for adverse events at the end of follow-up. P ≤ 0.05 is indicative of statistically significant.