Hyperlipidemia Clinical Trial
— GAUSS-2Official title:
A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of AMG 145, Compared With Ezetimibe, in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects Unable to Tolerate an Effective Dose of a HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor
Verified date | July 2020 |
Source | Amgen |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of 12 weeks of subcutaneous (SC) evolocumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) and monthly (QM), compared with ezetimibe, on percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hypercholesterolemic adults unable to tolerate an effective dose of a statin (HMG-CoA (5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 307 |
Est. completion date | November 19, 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | November 19, 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female = 18 to = 80 years of age - Not on a statin or on a low dose statin with stable dose for at least 4 weeks - History of intolerance to at least 2 statins - Subject not at LDL-C goal - Lipid lowering therapy has been stable prior to enrolment for at least 4 weeks. - Fasting triglycerides = 400 mg/dL Exclusion Criteria: - New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV heart failure - Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia - Uncontrolled hypertension - Type 1 diabetes, poorly controlled type 2 diabetes - Uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Research Site | Camperdown | New South Wales |
Australia | Research Site | Melbourne | Victoria |
Australia | Research Site | Milton | Queensland |
Australia | Research Site | Perth | Western Australia |
Belgium | Research Site | Brussels | |
Belgium | Research Site | Gent | |
Belgium | Research Site | La Louvière | |
Canada | Research Site | Lachine | Quebec |
Canada | Research Site | Newmarket | Ontario |
Canada | Research Site | Pointe-Claire | Quebec |
Denmark | Research Site | Aalborg | |
Denmark | Research Site | Ballerup | |
Denmark | Research Site | Vejle | |
France | Research Site | Lille Cedex | |
France | Research Site | Paris Cedex 13 | |
France | Research Site | Vénissieux | |
Germany | Research Site | Bad Krozingen | |
Germany | Research Site | Dresden | |
Germany | Research Site | Heppenheim | |
Hong Kong | Research Site | Hong Kong | |
Hong Kong | Research Site | New Territories | |
Netherlands | Research Site | Alkmaar | |
Netherlands | Research Site | Amsterdam | |
Netherlands | Research Site | Groningen | |
Poland | Research Site | Lodz | |
Poland | Research Site | Warszawa | |
South Africa | Research Site | Midrand | Gauteng |
South Africa | Research Site | Observatory | Western Cape |
South Africa | Research Site | Somerset West | Western Cape |
Spain | Research Site | Cordoba | Andalucía |
Spain | Research Site | Reus | Cataluña |
Spain | Research Site | Zaragoza | Aragón |
Switzerland | Research Site | Lugano | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Reinach | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Liverpool | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | London | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Telford | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | West Bromwich | |
United States | Research Site | Akron | Ohio |
United States | Research Site | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Research Site | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Research Site | Auburn | Maine |
United States | Research Site | Carmichael | California |
United States | Research Site | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Research Site | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Research Site | Henderson | Nevada |
United States | Research Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Research Site | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Research Site | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Research Site | Mission Viejo | California |
United States | Research Site | New York | New York |
United States | Research Site | Norman | Oklahoma |
United States | Research Site | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Research Site | Savannah | Georgia |
United States | Research Site | Thousand Oaks | California |
United States | Research Site | Traverse City | Michigan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Amgen |
United States, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom,
Cho L, Dent R, Stroes ESG, Stein EA, Sullivan D, Ruzza A, Flower A, Somaratne R, Rosenson RS. Persistent Safety and Efficacy of Evolocumab in Patients with Statin Intolerance: a Subset Analysis of the OSLER Open-Label Extension Studies. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018 Aug;32(4):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s10557-018-6817-7. — View Citation
Cho L, Rocco M, Colquhoun D, Sullivan D, Rosenson RS, Dent R, Xue A, Scott R, Wasserman SM, Stroes E. Design and rationale of the GAUSS-2 study trial: a double-blind, ezetimibe-controlled phase 3 study of the efficacy and tolerability of evolocumab (AMG 145) in subjects with hypercholesterolemia who are intolerant of statin therapy. Clin Cardiol. 2014 Mar;37(3):131-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.22248. Epub 2014 Jan 29. — View Citation
Kasichayanula S, Grover A, Emery MG, Gibbs MA, Somaratne R, Wasserman SM, Gibbs JP. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Evolocumab, a PCSK9 Inhibitor. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Jul;57(7):769-779. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0620-7. Review. — View Citation
Koren MJ, Jones PH, Robinson JG, Sullivan D, Cho L, Hucko T, Lopez JAG, Fleishman AN, Somaratne R, Stroes E. A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies. Cardiol Ther. 2020 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s40119-020-00181-8. [Epub ahead of print] — View Citation
Kuchimanchi M, Grover A, Emery MG, Somaratne R, Wasserman SM, Gibbs JP, Doshi S. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response modeling and simulation for evolocumab in healthy volunteers and patients with hypercholesterolemia. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018 Jun;45(3):505-522. doi: 10.1007/s10928-018-9592-y. Epub 2018 May 7. — View Citation
Shapiro MD, Minnier J, Tavori H, Kassahun H, Flower A, Somaratne R, Fazio S. Relationship Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Lipoprotein(a) Lowering in Response to PCSK9 Inhibition With Evolocumab. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 19;8(4):e010932. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010932. — View Citation
Stroes E, Colquhoun D, Sullivan D, Civeira F, Rosenson RS, Watts GF, Bruckert E, Cho L, Dent R, Knusel B, Xue A, Scott R, Wasserman SM, Rocco M; GAUSS-2 Investigators. Anti-PCSK9 antibody effectively lowers cholesterol in patients with statin intolerance: the GAUSS-2 randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial of evolocumab. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 17;63(23):2541-2548. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Mar 30. — View Citation
Stroes E, Robinson JG, Raal FJ, Dufour R, Sullivan D, Kassahun H, Ma Y, Wasserman SM, Koren MJ. Consistent LDL-C response with evolocumab among patient subgroups in PROFICIO: A pooled analysis of 3146 patients from phase 3 studies. Clin Cardiol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1328-1335. doi: 10.1002/clc.23049. Epub 2018 Oct 21. — View Citation
Toth PP, Descamps O, Genest J, Sattar N, Preiss D, Dent R, Djedjos C, Wu Y, Geller M, Uhart M, Somaratne R, Wasserman SM; PROFICIO Investigators. Pooled Safety Analysis of Evolocumab in Over 6000 Patients From Double-Blind and Open-Label Extension Studies. Circulation. 2017 May 9;135(19):1819-1831. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025233. Epub 2017 Mar 1. — View Citation
Toth PP, Jones SR, Monsalvo ML, Elliott-Davey M, López JAG, Banach M. Effect of Evolocumab on Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Apolipoprotein B, and Lipoprotein(a): A Pooled Analysis of Phase 2 and Phase 3 Studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 3;9(5):e014129. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014129. Epub 2020 Mar 2. — View Citation
Wasserman SM, Sabatine MS, Koren MJ, Giugliano RP, Legg JC, Emery MG, Doshi S, Liu T, Somaratne R, Gibbs JP. Comparison of LDL-C Reduction Using Different Evolocumab Doses and Intervals: Biological Insights and Treatment Implications. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;23(5):423-432. doi: 10.1177/1074248418774043. Epub 2018 May 16. — View Citation
* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Primary | Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) | Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With LDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) at Week 12 | Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 | Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 | ||
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00001154 -
Lipoprotein Metabolism in Normal Volunteers and Patients With High Levels of Lipoproteins
|
||
Completed |
NCT02927184 -
Safety and Tolerability of VK2809 in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04640012 -
Ascending-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics of DC371739 Single-Dose Treatment in Healthy Subjects
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03213288 -
Bilberry Fruit and Black Rice Derived Anthocyanins on Lipid Status
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00382564 -
Magnetic Resonance Angiography to Diagnose Atherosclerotic Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02979704 -
A Comparative Study of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients With Hyperlipidemia
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02569814 -
A Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Fixed Dose Combination of Fimasartan/Amlodipine/Rosuvastatin
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02428998 -
Safety for 24 Weeks Intake of Korean Red Ginseng in Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02280590 -
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Cresnon® and Crestor® in Patients With Hyperlipidemia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01678183 -
Financial Incentives for Medication Adherence
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01426412 -
A Study of LY3015014 in Healthy Participants With Elevated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01694446 -
Regulation of Intestinal and Hepatic Lipoprotein Production by Glucose and Fructose
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01131832 -
Genetic Basis for Heterogeneity in Response of Plasma Lipids to Plant Sterols
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00758303 -
A Study to Evaluate the Lipid Regulating Effects of TRIA-662
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00534105 -
Lipid Metabolism in Gestational Diabetes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00408824 -
Investigation of Genetic Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Company Employee (NGK Study)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00362206 -
Comparison of the Combination of Fenofibrate and Simvastatin Versus Pravastatin
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00299169 -
Randomized Trial Comparing N of 1 Trials to Standard Practice to Improve Adherence to Statins in Patients With Diabetes
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00701454 -
Survey of Thai-Muslim Health Status
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00414986 -
Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation for Diabetes and Depression
|
N/A |