Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02957682
Other study ID # R727-CL-1532
Secondary ID 2016-003189-16
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date November 2, 2016
Est. completion date March 5, 2020

Study information

Verified date April 2021
Source Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect on mental state (known as "neurocognitive function") with use of Praluent.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 2176
Est. completion date March 5, 2020
Est. primary completion date March 5, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 40 Years to 85 Years
Eligibility Key Inclusion Criteria: - Men and women = age 40 years and = age 85 years - Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) or with non-familial hypercholesterolemia (non-FH) patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk - Patients with history of coronary heart disease (CHD) not having adequate control of their hypercholesterolemia with LDL-C =70 mg/dL, or all other patients with LDL-C =100 mg/dL and be on maximally-tolerated dose of statin (unless they are statin-intolerant) - Patients must have successfully completed the Motor Screening Task - Patients must be willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study related procedures - Patients must provide signed informed consent Key Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with known Alzheimer's disease or other dementia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe depression, cognitive impairment, or patients with a sleep disorder requiring daily pharmacological treatment - Recent (within 3 months prior to the screening visit) myocardial infarction, unstable angina leading to hospitalization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, carotid surgery or stenting, stroke, transient ischemic attack, carotid revascularization, endovascular procedure or surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease - Certain laboratory findings obtained during the screening visit as defined in the protocol - Any condition or situation, including other significant mental or neurological disorders that, in the investigator's opinion, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the patient's participation in the study - Pregnant or breastfeeding women - A positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria apply

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Praluent (Alirocumab)

Placebo


Locations

Country Name City State
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site Pleven
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site Plovdiv
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site Plovdiv
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site Sofia
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site Sofia
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site Sofia
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site Stara Zagora
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site 1 Varna
Bulgaria Regeneron Study Site 2 Varna
Chile Regeneron Study Site Osorno
Chile Regeneron Study Site San Miguel
Chile Regeneron Study Site Santiago
Chile Regeneron Study Site Santiago
Chile Regeneron Study Site Santiago
Chile Regeneron Study Site Santiago
Chile Regeneron Study Site Temuco
Chile Regeneron Study Site Temuco
Chile Regeneron Study Site Viña del Mar
Estonia Regeneron Study Site Paide
Estonia Regeneron Study Site Tallinn
Estonia Regeneron Study Site Tallinn
Estonia Regeneron Study Site Tallinn
Estonia Regeneron Study Site Tallinn
Estonia Regeneron Study Site 1 Tallinn
Estonia Regeneron Study Site 2 Tallinn
Estonia Regeneron Study Site Tartu
Japan Regeneron Study Site Bunkyo-Ku Tokyo
Japan Regeneron Study Site Chuo Ku Tokyo
Japan Regeneron Study Site Hachioji Tokyo
Japan Regeneron Study Site Iruma-gun Saitama
Japan Regeneron Study Site Itabashi-ku Tokyo
Japan Regeneron Study Site Kahoku-gun Ishikawa
Japan Regeneron Study Site Kawasaki Kanagawa
Japan Regeneron Study Site Nakagami-gun Okinawa
Japan Regeneron Study Site Nishinomiya Hogo
Japan Regeneron Study Site Shinagawa-Ku Tokyo
Japan Regeneron Study Site Uji-shi Kyoto
Japan Regeneron Study Site Yokohama Kanagawa
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Aguascalientes
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Cuernavaca
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Culiacán
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Distrito Federal
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Durango
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Guadalajara
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Guadalajara
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Guadalajara
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Merida
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Mexico City
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Mexico City
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Mexico City
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Monterrey
Mexico Regeneron Study Site 1 Monterrey
Mexico Regeneron Study Site 2 Monterrey
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Pachuca
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Querétaro
Mexico Regeneron Study Site San Juan Del Río
Mexico Regeneron Study Site Torreon
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Ivanovo
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Kirov
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Moscow
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Moscow
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Moscow
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Novosibirsk
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Rostov-on-Don
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Saratov
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Tyumen'
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Yaroslavl
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site Yaroslavl
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site 1 Yaroslavl
Russian Federation Regeneron Study Site 2 Yaroslavl
South Africa Regeneron Study Site 1 Bloemfontein
South Africa Regeneron Study Site 2 Bloemfontein
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Cape Town Western Cape
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Cape Town Western Cape
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Claremont
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Halfway House Gauteng
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Kempton Park Johannesburg
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Kuils River Cape Town
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Middelburg Mpumalanga
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Paarl Western Cape
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Port Elizabeth Eastern Cape
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Pretoria Gauteng
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Pretoria Gauteng
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Pretoria West Gauteng
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Somerset West Western Cape
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Soweto Johannesburg
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Soweto Johannesburg
South Africa Regeneron Study Site Worcester Western Cape
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Kharkiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Kharkiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Kharkov
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 1 Kiev
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 2 Kiev
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 1 Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 1 Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 1 Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 2 Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 2 Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 2 Kyiv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site L'viv
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Úzhgorod Transcarpathian Region
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site Vinnitsa
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 1 Vinnitsa
Ukraine Regeneron Study Site 2 Vinnitsa
United States Regeneron Study Site Ames Iowa
United States Regeneron Study Site Auburn Alabama
United States Regeneron Study Site 1 Aurora Colorado
United States Regeneron Study Site 2 Aurora Colorado
United States Regeneron Study Site Baltimore Maryland
United States Regeneron Study Site Bangor Maine
United States Regeneron Study Site Beverly Hills California
United States Regeneron Study Site Birmingham Alabama
United States Regeneron Study Site Bristol Tennessee
United States Regeneron Study Site Buffalo New York
United States Regeneron Study Site Burien Washington
United States Regeneron Study Site Cary North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Champaign Illinois
United States Regeneron Study Site Charleston South Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Charlotte North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Charlotte North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Chicago Illinois
United States Regeneron Study Site Chicago Illinois
United States Regeneron Study Site Cincinnati Ohio
United States Regeneron Study Site Cleveland Ohio
United States Regeneron Study Site Colorado Springs Colorado
United States Regeneron Study Site Covington Georgia
United States Regeneron Study Site Dallas Texas
United States Regeneron Study Site Dayton Ohio
United States Regeneron Study Site Duncansville Pennsylvania
United States Regeneron Study Site Evansville Indiana
United States Regeneron Study Site Everett Washington
United States Regeneron Study Site Falls Church Virginia
United States Regeneron Study Site Greensboro North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Greenville South Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Hickory North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site High Point North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Houston Texas
United States Regeneron Study Site Houston Texas
United States Regeneron Study Site Hutchinson Kansas
United States Regeneron Study Site Indianapolis Indiana
United States Regeneron Study Site Iowa City Iowa
United States Regeneron Study Site Knoxville Tennessee
United States Regeneron Study Site Knoxville Tennessee
United States Regeneron Study Site Knoxville Tennessee
United States Regeneron Study Site Lake Worth Florida
United States Regeneron Study Site Lake Worth Florida
United States Regeneron Study Site Los Gatos California
United States Regeneron Study Site Louisville Kentucky
United States Regeneron Study Site Manitowoc Wisconsin
United States Regeneron Study Site Miami Springs Florida
United States Regeneron Study Site Minneapolis Minnesota
United States Regeneron Study Site Mobile Alabama
United States Regeneron Study Site New Hyde Park New York
United States Regeneron Study Site Newton Kansas
United States Regeneron Study Site North Hollywood California
United States Regeneron Study Site Olive Branch Mississippi
United States Regeneron Study Site Overland Park Kansas
United States Regeneron Study Site Oxon Hill Maryland
United States Regeneron Study Site Port Hueneme California
United States Regeneron Study Site Powell Tennessee
United States Regeneron Study Site Raleigh North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Rapid City South Dakota
United States Regeneron Study Site Rock Island Illinois
United States Regeneron Study Site Rocky Mount North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Salisbury North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Schertz Texas
United States Regeneron Study Site Shavano Park Texas
United States Regeneron Study Site Statesville North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Summerville South Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Tacoma Washington
United States Regeneron Study Site Walla Walla Washington
United States Regeneron Study Site Washington Missouri
United States Regeneron Study Site Waterloo Iowa
United States Regeneron Study Site Westminster California
United States Regeneron Study Site Wilmington North Carolina
United States Regeneron Study Site Winchester Virginia
United States Regeneron Study Site Winston-Salem North Carolina

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Sanofi

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Bulgaria,  Chile,  Estonia,  Japan,  Mexico,  Russian Federation,  South Africa,  Ukraine, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline in Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) Cognitive Domain Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Strategy Z-Score at Week 96 CANTAB SWM task assessed cognitive domain of executive function. Colored boxes were shown on a screen. A token was hidden in one of the boxes (never same box twice). Instructions were to touch boxes to search for token until number of tokens found equaled number of boxes. SWM strategy index represents number of times a search began with a different box. Z-score represents standardized measure of how far an individual deviated from study cohort average at baseline. A higher Z-score reflects better performance. Week 96
Secondary Change From Baseline in CANTAB Cognitive Domain SWM Strategy Raw Score at Week 96 CANTAB SWM task assessed cognitive domain of executive function. Colored boxes were shown on a screen. A token was hidden in one of the boxes (never same box twice). Instructions were to touch boxes to search for token until number of tokens found equaled number of boxes. SWM strategy index represents number of times a search began with a different box. Lower change from baseline raw scores reflect better SWM performance (i.e. less impairment). Week 96
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percent change from baseline in calculated LDL-C at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 was reported. LDL-C was measured using conventional units milligram per deciliter (mg/dL). Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percent change from baseline in Apo B at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 was reported. Apo B was measured using conventional units mg/dL. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 was reported. Non-HDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percent change from baseline in calculated Total-C at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 was reported. Total-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percent change from baseline in Lp(a) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 was reported. Lp(a) was measured using conventional units mg/dL. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percent change from baseline in HDL-C at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 was reported. HDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percent change from baseline in TG at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 was reported. TG was measured using conventional units mg/dL. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-1 at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percent change from baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 was reported. Apo A-1 was measured using conventional units mg/dL. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Reached Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Level Less Than (<) 70 mg/dL (1.81 Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percentage of participants who reached LDL-C level < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 were reported. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Reached Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Level Less Than (<) 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 Percentage of participants who reached LDL-C level < 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) at Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 were reported. Week 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96
Secondary Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs An Adverse Event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAE was defined as AEs that developed or worsened/became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first double-blind study treatment injection up to 70 days after the last double-blind study treatment injection). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. Up to Week 96
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04998695 - Health Effects of Consuming Olive Pomace Oil N/A
Recruiting NCT03947866 - Ezetimibe-Rosuvastatin Evaluation Study
Completed NCT01709513 - Study of Alirocumab (REGN727/SAR236553) in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Moderate, High, or Very High Cardiovascular (CV) Risk, Who Are Intolerant to Statins (ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE) Phase 3
Completed NCT01212900 - Randomized Trial of Imaging Versus Risk Factor-Based Therapy for Plaque Regression Phase 4
Completed NCT00001154 - Lipoprotein Metabolism in Normal Volunteers and Patients With High Levels of Lipoproteins
Completed NCT02550288 - A Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0653C in Japanese Participants With Hypercholesterolemia (MK-0653C-383) Phase 3
Completed NCT03929198 - Translation of Pritikin Program to the Community N/A
Completed NCT04485793 - Effect of a Dietary Supplement on Lipid Pattern and Liver Parameters in Hypercholesterolemia N/A
Completed NCT02341924 - Validating the "Foods for Health" Portfolio of Functional Food Products N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02223793 - Vascular Lifestyle-Intervention and Screening in Pharmacy N/A
Completed NCT01941836 - Evaluation of ETC-1002, Ezetimibe, and the Combination in Hypercholesterolemic Patients Phase 2
Completed NCT01934608 - The Effect of Synching Prescription Refills on Adherence N/A
Recruiting NCT01705873 - Analysis on the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in HIV- Infected Subjects Treated With LPV/r Based HAART Regimen vs. an EFV Based Regimen N/A
Completed NCT01678521 - Effect of LDL-apheresis on PTX3 Plasma Levels in Hypercholesterolemic Patients N/A
Completed NCT01670734 - Pharmacokinetic and Tolerability of Alirocumab SAR236553 (REGN727) in Patients With Hepatic Impairment and in Healthy Subjects Phase 1
Completed NCT01370590 - A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin 10 mg/20 mg Combination Tablet Compared to Marketed Ezetimibe 10 mg and Atorvastatin 20 mg Tablets in Participants With High Cholesterol (MK-0653C-185 AM1) Phase 3
Completed NCT01370603 - A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin 10 mg/40 mg Combination Tablet Compared to Marketed Ezetimibe 10 mg and Atorvastatin 40 mg Tablets in Participants With High Cholesterol (MK-0653C-190 AM1) Phase 3
Completed NCT01768403 - Centralised Pan-Algerian Survey on the Undertreatment of Hypercholesterolemia N/A
Completed NCT01575171 - Using Nudges to Implement Comparative Effectiveness N/A
Completed NCT01478789 - Efficacy of Plant Sterol-Fortified Dairy Product on Plasma Lipid and Plant Sterol Concentrations in Humans N/A