View clinical trials related to Hyperactive Delirium.
Filter by:1. Background and Clinical Need: Delirium is common at the end of life and is challenging to control. There is a clinical need to study the benefits of commonly used drugs like Haloperidol and Olanzapine in the management of hyperactive delirium in advanced cancer or end-stage organ disease patients in a scientifically robust manner. 2. Aims/Hypotheses: The investigators aim to study the effectiveness of Haloperidol compared with Olanzapine in the management of hyperactive delirium in advanced cancer or end-stage organ disease patients receiving palliative care. The investigators hypothesise that Olanzapine is as effective as Haloperidol in the control of hyperactive delirium. 3. Methods: The investigators will conduct a pragmatic, multi-centre, (hospital, inpatient hospice, community hospital) open-label randomised-controlled trial comparing the use of Haloperidol versus Olanzapine in advanced cancer or end-stage organ disease patients with hyperactive delirium. The primary outcome is the change in Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) scores among patients in each treatment group at 8 hours post-drug administration. The secondary outcome is the control of hyperactive delirium at 24, 48 and 72 hours using either Haloperidol or Olanzapine. The mean doses of Haloperidol and Olanzapine used as well as the volume of rescue Midazolam required as well as side-effects of the study medications, survival after enrolment into study will also be studied. 4. Significance to palliative care The results of this study will advance the knowledge of delirium management worldwide with regards to the efficacy of Haloperidol and Olanzapine in managing hyperactive delirium in patients with advanced cancer or end-stage organ disease. Haloperidol is used traditionally in palliative care for managing delirium. However, as a conventional anti-psychotic, it does cause extra-pyramidal side-effects. Olanzapine, a newer atypical anti-psychotic with a more favourable side-effect profile is being used increasingly in the control of delirium. These 2 commonly used drugs have never been compared head to head in a randomised-controlled, multi-centre study.
The goal of this multi-centre phase I/II open-label, single-arm study is to determine the feasibility, optimal dose, and preliminary efficacy of dexmedetomidine to manage agitated delirium among patients near the end of life followed by a palliative care provider in a non-monitored setting. Fifty patients will receive dexmedetomidine (0.4 mcg/kg/hour, titrated up to 1.0 mcg/kg/hour) subcutaneously. Feasibility (recruitment rate, cost), safety (rate of adverse events), dosing, and preliminary efficacy (agitation, delirium severity) will be measured.
"To determine the efficacy of program of prevention of delirium in critically ill patients from the intensive care units of Bucaramanga and Floridablanca. Methods: The study will be a randomized controlled clinical trial in 600 critically ill patients recruited at 24 hours from arrival on the intensive care units of Bucaramanga and Floridablanca, without delirium, with ≥50% in the PREDELIRIC scale score, who comply with the inclusion and exclusion. The patients will be randomized in blocks to one of the two groups, intervention group (delirium prevention program, n=200) with control group (usual care; n= 400), the study will compare the incidence of delirium in both groups. Patients will be followed every day with Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) until the patient presents delirium, exit to hospitalization or death. Delirium prevention program includes individualized nonpharmacological interventions such as multisensory stimulation, cognitive stimulation, activate the functional and family involvement. The study has received ethical approval from the University of Santander"