Hydatidiform Moles Clinical Trial
Official title:
Genetic Studies in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Verified date | October 2023 |
Source | Baylor College of Medicine |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The researchers' laboratory is studying a rare class of highly recurrent hydatidiform moles. These are usually complete hydatidiform moles (CHM), but sometimes they are partial hydatidiform moles PHM). With sporadic moles, the difference between CHMs and PHMs is that with CHMS, there is not typically an embryo or fetus at the time of diagnosis but with a PHM there may be a fetus. Also, CHMs have 46 chromosomes in each cell. While this is the number of chromosomes that should be found, the problem is that all the chromosomes come from the father. Normally, half the chromosomes should come from the mother and half should come from the father. Unlike CHMs, PHMs have 69 chromosomes. This means that PHMs have three copies of each chromosome when they should only have two. The extra copy comes from the father. The researchers' study focuses on moles that are genetically different from these sporadic moles in that they have 23 chromosomes from the mother and 23 chromosomes from the father - just like a normally developing pregnancy. These are called biparental moles because the mutation that causes the mole comes from both parents. This mutation occurs in a gene called NLRP7. The researchers' team is working to understand how mutations in NLRP7 leads to CHMs and how these mutations may lead to other types of pregnancy loss. The researchers are also trying to discover other genetic and epigenetic factors that may lead to moles.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 100 |
Est. completion date | January 2030 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2030 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Personal or family history of recurrent moles or a sporadic mole - Presence of a mutation in NLRP7 Exclusion Criteria: - None |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Baylor College of Medicine |
United States,
Al-Hussaini TK, Abd el-Aal DM, Van den Veyver IB. Recurrent pregnancy loss due to familial and non-familial habitual molar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Nov;83(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00209-1. — View Citation
Djuric U, El-Maarri O, Lamb B, Kuick R, Seoud M, Coullin P, Oldenburg J, Hanash S, Slim R. Familial molar tissues due to mutations in the inflammatory gene, NALP7, have normal postzygotic DNA methylation. Hum Genet. 2006 Oct;120(3):390-5. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0192-3. Epub 2006 Jul 28. — View Citation
Fisher RA, Hodges MD, Newlands ES. Familial recurrent hydatidiform mole: a review. J Reprod Med. 2004 Aug;49(8):595-601. — View Citation
Fisher RA, Hodges MD, Rees HC, Sebire NJ, Seckl MJ, Newlands ES, Genest DR, Castrillon DH. The maternally transcribed gene p57(KIP2) (CDNK1C) is abnormally expressed in both androgenetic and biparental complete hydatidiform moles. Hum Mol Genet. 2002 Dec 15;11(26):3267-72. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.26.3267. — View Citation
Kou YC, Shao L, Peng HH, Rosetta R, del Gaudio D, Wagner AF, Al-Hussaini TK, Van den Veyver IB. A recurrent intragenic genomic duplication, other novel mutations in NLRP7 and imprinting defects in recurrent biparental hydatidiform moles. Mol Hum Reprod. 2 — View Citation
Mahadevan S, Wen S, Balasa A, Fruhman G, Mateus J, Wagner A, Al-Hussaini T, Van den Veyver IB. No evidence for mutations in NLRP7 and KHDC3L in women with androgenetic hydatidiform moles. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Dec;33(13):1242-7. doi: 10.1002/pd.4239. Epub 20 — View Citation
Mahadevan S, Wen S, Wan YW, Peng HH, Otta S, Liu Z, Iacovino M, Mahen EM, Kyba M, Sadikovic B, Van den Veyver IB. NLRP7 affects trophoblast lineage differentiation, binds to overexpressed YY1 and alters CpG methylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Feb 1;23(3):706 — View Citation
Moglabey YB, Kircheisen R, Seoud M, El Mogharbel N, Van den Veyver I, Slim R. Genetic mapping of a maternal locus responsible for familial hydatidiform moles. Hum Mol Genet. 1999 Apr;8(4):667-71. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.4.667. — View Citation
Murdoch S, Djuric U, Mazhar B, Seoud M, Khan R, Kuick R, Bagga R, Kircheisen R, Ao A, Ratti B, Hanash S, Rouleau GA, Slim R. Mutations in NALP7 cause recurrent hydatidiform moles and reproductive wastage in humans. Nat Genet. 2006 Mar;38(3):300-2. doi: 10.1038/ng1740. Epub 2006 Feb 5. — View Citation
Panichkul PC, Al-Hussaini TK, Sierra R, Kashork CD, Popek EJ, Stockton DW, Van den Veyver IB. Recurrent biparental hydatidiform mole: additional evidence for a 1.1-Mb locus in 19q13.4 and candidate gene analysis. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2005 Jul;12(5):376 — View Citation
Qian J, Deveault C, Bagga R, Xie X, Slim R. Women heterozygous for NALP7/NLRP7 mutations are at risk for reproductive wastage: report of two novel mutations. Hum Mutat. 2007 Jul;28(7):741. doi: 10.1002/humu.9498. — View Citation
Saxena A, Frank D, Panichkul P, Van den Veyver IB, Tycko B, Thaker H. The product of the imprinted gene IPL marks human villous cytotrophoblast and is lost in complete hydatidiform mole. Placenta. 2003 Sep-Oct;24(8-9):835-42. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(03)00 — View Citation
Slim R, Mehio A. The genetics of hydatidiform moles: new lights on an ancient disease. Clin Genet. 2007 Jan;71(1):25-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00697.x. — View Citation
Van den Veyver IB, Al-Hussaini TK. Biparental hydatidiform moles: a maternal effect mutation affecting imprinting in the offspring. Hum Reprod Update. 2006 May-Jun;12(3):233-42. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmk005. Epub 2006 Mar 15. — View Citation
Van den Veyver IB, Norman B, Tran CQ, Bourjac J, Slim R. The human homologue (PEG3) of the mouse paternally expressed gene 3 (Peg3) is maternally imprinted but not mutated in women with familial recurrent hydatidiform molar pregnancies. J Soc Gynecol Inve — View Citation
van der Smagt JJ, Scheenjes E, Kremer JA, Hennekam FA, Fisher RA. Heterogeneity in the origin of recurrent complete hydatidiform moles: not all women with multiple molar pregnancies have biparental moles. BJOG. 2006 Jun;113(6):725-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00929.x. — View Citation
Zhao J, Moss J, Sebire NJ, Cui QC, Seckl MJ, Xiang Y, Fisher RA. Analysis of the chromosomal region 19q13.4 in two Chinese families with recurrent hydatidiform mole. Hum Reprod. 2006 Feb;21(2):536-41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei357. Epub 2005 Oct 20. — View Citation
* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Identifying the change in the genetic information that causes recurrent hydatidiform moles. | The researchers will isolate genetic material from blood of women with recurrent hydatidiform molar (RHM) pregnancies, their RHM pregnancies, and for some first-degree relatives. DNA sequencing along with bioinformatic analysis will be used to find changes in the genetic code unique to individuals with RHM. When a new gene is found that shows variants that are deleterious to its function in at least 3 unrelated women with RHM, but not in healthy pregnant women, the outcome (finding a new genetic cause of RHM) will be achieved. RHM are very rare and only 70% have a known cause (known gene), thus the researchers will continue recruitment and enrollment of rare undiagnosed individuals when they are referred to the study. A key finding in one individual can provide the clue for a new disease gene in others. It cannot be predicted when this will happen, thus enrollment and data collection will continue as long as the protocol is open. | Through study completion, an average of 15 years. | |
Primary | Identifying the changes in the genetic information that cause different forms of unexplained reproductive failure | The researchers will isolate genetic material from blood of women with recurrent unexplained reproductive failure (RF), their miscarried pregnancies if possible, and for some from first-degree relatives. DNA sequencing and bioinformatic analysis will be used to find changes in the genetic code unique to individuals with unexplained RF. When a new gene is found that shows variants that are deleterious to its function in at least 3 unrelated women with unexplained RF, but not in healthy pregnant women, the outcome (finding a new genetic cause for RF) will be achieved. Unexplained RF is relatively rare and many causes are not yet known, thus the researchers will continue recruitment and enrollment of rare undiagnosed individuals when they are referred to the study. A key finding in one individual can provide the clue for a new disease gene in others. It cannot be predicted when this will happen, thus enrollment and data collection will continue as long as the protocol is open | Through study completion, an average of 15 years. |