Hip Prosthesis Infection Clinical Trial
— SINBIOSE-HOfficial title:
Single-stage Surgery With Antibiotic-loaded Hydrogel Coated Implants Versus Two Stage Surgery for Secondary Prevention of Complex Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection SINBIOSE-H.
Each year, around 1500 infected Total Hip Arthroplasties (THA) need non-conservative surgery, remaining an issue for patients and healthcare units. The recommended treatment, relying on cohort reviews and international consensus follows a two-stage protocol. This protocol implies a first surgery to remove all infected implants and at least 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment without implant, then usually an antibiotic-free period and only then a second surgery to put back new implants and start the rehabilitation protocol, with usually more than a week of a second hospital stay. Between both surgeries, full-weight bearing is prohibited and joint stiffness and/or pain are rather usual complications. Failure rate is estimated at 10% in this two-stage strategy. The single-stage procedure (i.e. implanting back a new prosthesis during the same surgery after implant removal, synovectomy and lavage) is thought to be less susceptible to late functional complications (i.e. pain, stiffness and muscle deficiency) with a shorter, single hospital stay. Although, with single-stage surgery, infection control could be less efficient because most pathogens produce during the first hours of infection an antibiotic-resistant layer called biofilm, allowing them to colonize and adhere to foreign objects like implants. This single-surgery protocol thus highly relies on antibiotics and has a list of contra-indications (based on experts' consensus): the presence of damaged soft tissues or a sinus tract, unknown pathogens, difficult to treat micro-organisms, severe immunosuppression and for many surgeons, each time a bone graft is necessary. Most of these contra-indications are directly related to the biofilm. As no randomized control trial has ever compared single-stage versus two-stage surgery, the level of evidence for recommending one procedure over the other is low. We conducted a survey that showed that most of the French reference centers have already switched to single stage surgery for single-stage non contra-indicated cases. An antibiotic-loaded hydrogel coating (Defensive Antiadhesive Coating®, Novagenit SRL), has been proven to mechanically prevent the biofilm formation, while allowing a prolonged intraarticular antibiotic release, in a randomized controlled trial in primary prevention of infection in THA. The addition of this biofilm inhibitor to a single-stage surgery might stand as a promising strategy for secondary prevention of peri-prosthetic hip joint infection. Moreover, using this device to prevent biofilm formation could expand one stage surgery to patients that are "normally" contra-indicated to one stage surgery.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 440 |
Est. completion date | December 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Social security affiliation - Signed informed consent - Chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection defined according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria : - Two positive periprosthetic cultures with phenotypically identical organisms - or a sinus tract communicating with the joint, - or having 3 of 5 minor criteria: - Elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR); - Elevated synovial fluid White Blood Cell (WBC) count or change of ++ on leukocyte esterase test strip; - Elevated synovial fluid Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Percentage (PMN%); - Positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue; - A single positive culture. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with hypersensitivity to hydrogel components (hyaluronic acid and/or poly-lactic acid) known of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC)® - Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test (performed in women of childbearing age before inclusion) - Life expectancy < 3 months - Expected use of a cemented implant by the surgical team (for the treatment surgical protocol) - Unable to give informed consent - Patients under guardianship or curators - Refusal to participate |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHU Amiens | Amiens | |
France | CHU Bordeaux | Bordeaux | |
France | CHU Caen | Caen | |
France | CHU Clermont-Ferrand | Clermont-Ferrand | |
France | CHU Dijon | Dijon | |
France | CHU Lille | Lille | |
France | HCL - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse | Lyon | |
France | HCL - Hôpital Edouard Herriot | Lyon | |
France | CHU Marseille | Marseille | |
France | CHU Nancy | Nancy | |
France | CHU Nantes | Nantes | |
France | CHU Nice | Nice | |
France | Chu Saint-Etienne | Saint-etienne | |
France | CHU Toulouse | Toulouse |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne | Ministry of Health, France |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Recurrence of clinically diagnosed infection relapse of the periprosthetic joint | The periprosthetic joint infection is defined according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria:
Two positive periprosthetic cultures with phenotypically identical organisms or a sinus tract communicating with the joint, or having 3 of 5 minor criteria: Elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); Elevated synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count; Elevated synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%); Positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue; A single positive culture. |
Years : 2 | |
Secondary | Harris Hip Score (HHS) results | Harris Hip Score (HHS) contains 10 items with maximum score at 100 for a perfect hip and minimum score at 0 for a very bad result. | Years : 2 | |
Secondary | Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) results | Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) contains 3 items (pain, mobility and functional hip) with maximum score at 18 for a perfect hip and minimum score at 0 for a very bad result. | Years : 2 | |
Secondary | Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) results | Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score contains 6 items (symptoms, stiffness, pain, function and daily life, sport and leisure activities, quality of life) and measure everyday activities with score from 0 to 4. | Years : 2 | |
Secondary | Oxford-12 results | Oxford-12 allows to know the feelings of the patient during the last 4 weeks felt from 1 to 5 (satisfaction score). | Years : 2 | |
Secondary | Death rate (%) | Analysis of death rate by group. | Years : 2 | |
Secondary | Post-operative complications | Analysis of post-operative complications by group. | Years : 2 | |
Secondary | Revision surgery for any cause other than infection | Analysis of revision surgery for any cause other than infection. | Years : 2 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03389646 -
CERAMENTTM|G and V in the Management of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Revisions (Revision Arthroplasty Italy)
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04119804 -
Early Discrimination of Periprosthetic Hip Infections Using Neural Networks (SEPTIC-ANNR)
|
||
Terminated |
NCT05615701 -
Image Quality of EOSedge for Radiographic Evaluation of Hip Implant
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02660268 -
Contribution of a Clinical Pathway for the Treatment of Hip Prosthesis Infections
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04304885 -
Effect of Sonication on Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment Strategy.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05000723 -
Long Term Follow-up of Patients With Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip Treated at University Hospitals Leuven
|
||
Completed |
NCT05932823 -
Does the Type of Ventilation Affect the Risk for Infections After Hip Replacements?
|
||
Completed |
NCT01963520 -
Prosthetic Hip Infections: Prospective Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04488458 -
Susceptibility Testing of Biofilm to Guide Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03161990 -
DAIR for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty - Does the Operative Approach Influence the Functional Result?
|