ESP Block vs FIB in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to compare between the analgesic efficacy of ESP block and FIB in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Clinical Trial Description

Hip arthroplasty surgery is usually associated with severe postoperative pain. Several modalities are usually used for postoperative analgesia in these patients, those include; intravenous analgesia, neuraxial analgesia and peripheral nerve blocks. Peripheral nerve blocks have several advantages such as; potent analgesia, lower motor impairment and minimal systemic complications. Lumbar plexus block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (FIB) are the most commonly performed peripheral nerve blocks for hip surgeries. Fascia iliaca block is one of the most common techniques for pain control after hip surgeries; it can be regarded as an anterior approach of the lumbar plexus. It provides analgesia through spread of local anaesthetic to the femoral and lateral cutaneous femoral nerves. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recent regional anesthetic technique. It was first described in 2016 for acute and chronic thoracic pain management. It is a paraspinal fascial plane block that provides analgesia through injecting local anesthetic drugs to block the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves in the paravertebral area. To the best of the investigators knowledge, the use of ESP block in hip surgery was only investigated in one study and few case reports. Therefore, further randomized controlled studies are needed to prove this hypothesis. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of ESP block in hip replacement compared to the supra-inguinal FIB. The investigators hypothesize that erector spinae block may provide better postoperative analgesia than fascia iliaca block, since erector spinae block provides analgesic cover for the entire lumbar plexus rather than just peripheral nerves provided by fasicia iliaca. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05015517
Study type	Interventional
Source	Cairo University
Contact	Ahmed MA Moawad, Ass.lecturer
Phone	01098189096
Email	ahmedmohammed621991@gmail.com
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	September 2021
Completion date	October 2022

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT05556759` - Anterior Iliopsoas Muscle Space Block Versus Supra-iliac Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT05030688` - Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block and PENG Block for Hip Arthroplasty	N/A
Completed	`NCT05134207` - The Effect of Oral Carbohydrate Solution on Anxiety and Comfort in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04438265` - Quadratus Lumborum Type 2 as Chronic Hip Pain Treatment
Recruiting	`NCT04229368` - Effect of Vitamin D Status and Repletion on Postoperative Total Joint Arthroplasty Complications	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05142462` - Post Market Clinical Follow-up of EUROSCUP Fixe Acetabular Cup
Completed	`NCT06083428` - Erector Spinae vs. PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT05396924` - Rectal Temperature Measurement in Detecting Hypothermia During Hip Arthroscopy	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05524363` - Assessment of Safety and Performances of HYPE SCS Stem Associated to NOVAE Sunfit TH Acetabular Cup in Hip Arthroplasty
Recruiting	`NCT06147401` - Comparison of PENG Associated With LFCN Block Versus FICB for Multimodal Analgesic Management in THA	N/A
Completed	`NCT03977454` - Periarticular Injection Versus Peripheral Nerve Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty	Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT05397145` - Iliopsoas Plane Block vs PENG Block for Hip Arthroplasty	N/A
Completed	`NCT03981354` - Nutritional Status and Its Modifications After Hip Replacement
Recruiting	`NCT06257160` - Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-guided PENG Block Compared to Surgical Infiltration in the Analgesia of Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04995822` - Post Market Clinical Follow-up of EUROSTEM Femoral Stem
Completed	`NCT04883788` - The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Hip and Knee Replacement
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06317870` - Pericapsular Nerve Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia After Primary Hip Arthroplasty	N/A
Completed	`NCT03541798` - Comparison of Three Different Sitting Positions for Performing Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia	N/A
Completed	`NCT04306133` - PENG Block Combined to Wound Infiltration for Hip Replacement	N/A
Completed	`NCT04123873` - Effect of Combinations of Paracetamol, Ibuprofen, and Dexamethasone on Patient-Controlled Morphine Consumption in the First 24 Hours After Total Hip Arthroplasty	Phase 4

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.