Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06159504 |
Other study ID # |
CUTTS HepC / HCV MoC |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
Early Phase 1
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 2024 |
Est. completion date |
December 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
Médecins du Monde |
Contact |
Bridget Draper |
Phone |
+61 413 272 698 |
Email |
bridget.draper[@]burnet.edu.au |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of this non-randomised, quasi-experimental, prospective comparative trial is to
trial simplified care pathways for hepatitis C testing and treatment for people who inject
drugs in Armenia, Georgia, and Tanzania.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. What is the feasibility of implementing a hepatitis C simplified care and same-day
treatment care model in community and harm reduction settings in the three study
countries?
2. Does a same-day treatment initiation model involving only POC antibody tests (with a
shortened read-time) increase hepatitis C treatment uptake and SVR12 outcome (cure)
among people who inject drugs compared with a simplified care model involving POC
antibody followed by a confirmatory RNA test?
3. What is the comparative cost-effectiveness between a same-day antibody only hepatitis C
testing and treatment model and the simplified care model (POC antibody/confirmatory RNA
test) model?
Participants will:
- be enrolled in a new simplified model of care in each country (Arm 1). After the
enrolment target is met for Arm 1 (approx. 3-9 months into implementation) new
participants will be enrolled into a same-day treatment trial, using presumptive
treatment after a reactive POC test result at shortened read-time (5minutes) (Arm 2)
- if in Arm 1, participants will commence SOF-VEL DAA treatment after receiving an RNA
test to confirm current hepatitis C infection. They will then continue along the
treatment pathway, returning for RNA testing 4-16 weeks after SVR12 to determine cure.
- if in Arm 2, participants will begin SOF-VEL DAA treatment on the same day as the 5
minute RDT testing. They will then continue along the treatment pathway, returning for
RNA testing 4-16 weeks after SVR12 to determine cure.
Researchers will compare cure and participant retention rates between the two groups.
Description:
We will conduct a study to trial a new, simplified, and lower cost clinical pathway and
determine its feasibility, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability in Armenia,
Georgia, and Tanzania.
This is a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, prospective comparative trial with
approximately 350 participants initiated onto hepatitis C treatment in each arm. Arm one is a
simplified care model (following global guidance) with hepatitis C treatment commencing after
a rapid hepatitis C antibody test and a confirmatory positive hepatitis C ribonucleic acid
(RNA) test. Arm two will involve same day treatment commencement following a positive rapid
antibody test without confirmatory RNA testing prior to treatment initiation (RNA testing
will be completed after treatment is provided). In arm two, the decision to treat will be
based on the result of an early read time (< 5 mins) of a rapid antibody test which previous
research findings suggest correlates strongly with a hepatitis C RNA positive test result.
All positive participants will be treated with sofosbuvir (400mg) and velpatasvir (100mg),
self-administered orally once per day for 12 weeks. Hepatitis C cure will be assessed by
sustained virological response (SVR) laboratory testing.
The first primary outcome is feasibility, measured throughout the care cascade. Primary
outcomes compared across the two arms will be the proportion of participants 1) commencing
treatment and 2) achieving SVR. Test concordance and validity of the early read time will be
assessed against laboratory RNA test results (which will also guide decisions to continue or
cease treatment in Arm 2). A mixed effects model will be used to assess study outcomes and
infectious diseases modelling will determine cost-effectiveness. The acceptability and
feasibility of the models will be assessed through thematic analysis of participant and
practitioner interviews, and site assessments.