Clinical Trials Logo

Hepatitis B clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hepatitis B.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00606099 Withdrawn - Chronic Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Telbivudine in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B

Start date: November 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of telbivudine 600mg versus adefovir dipivoxil 10mg in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B.

NCT ID: NCT00605384 Terminated - Chronic Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

A Phase IIIb Study to Compare Entecavir Plus Tenofovir vs. Adefovir Added to Continuing Lamivudine Therapy in Adult Patients With Lamivudine-Resistant Hepatitis B Infection

Start date: August 2008
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this clinical research study is to find out whether a combination of entecavir (ETV) plus tenofovir (TNF) works better against Hepatitis B virus than adefovir (ADV) added to continuing lamivudine (LVD) therapy in patients whose Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is resistant against lamivudine. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

NCT ID: NCT00603252 Completed - Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Study to Show That the Combined Hepatitis A and B Vaccine is Non-inferior to Monovalent Vaccines in Adults

Start date: January 2008
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This protocol posting describes the booster phase of the study. The objectives & outcome measures of the primary phase are presented in a separate protocol posting (NCT number = NCT00289731).

NCT ID: NCT00597259 Recruiting - Chronic Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Pegasys Plus Entecavir Versus Entecavir Alone for Hepatitis Be Antigen-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

Start date: January 2008
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Although the best treatment choice for chronic hepatitis B is not clarified yet, certain therapeutic concepts could be derived from the experience of treating patients with chronic hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. A major advancement in treating hepatitis C or HIV infection has been the development of combination therapy. Whether the combination therapy using Peg-IFN alfa-2a plus ETV can achieve a long-term beneficial effect against ETV alone is not clarified. A prior single-arm pilot study suggested that similar combination therapy may be beneficial in patients with chronic hepatitis B. In this proposal, we thus hypothesize that the efficacy by using combination therapy with pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus ETV is superior to that by using ETV alone in that Peg-IFN may restore host immunity against HBV and prolonged ETV can maximize viral suppression. The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of Peg-IFN alfa-2a at a dose of 180 mcg administered subcutaneously per week and ETV 0.5 mg daily for 24 weeks followed by ETV 0.5 mg daily monotherapy for an additional 120 weeks versus ETV 0.5 mg daily monotherapy for 144 weeks in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. It will be an open-label, randomized, comparative, multi-center clinical trial. The recruited patients will be equally randomized into two treatment groups. Treatment-free follow-up period will be 48 weeks in both groups of patients. All subjects will be assessed for loss of HBeAg, presence of anti-HBe, loss of HBsAg, presence of anti-HBs, suppression of HBV DNA, and normalization of serum ALT at the end of treatment and end of follow-up. Genotypic and virologic resistance to ETV will also be assessed at baseline and at end of years 1, 2 and 3. The primary efficacy will be HBeAg seroconversion.

NCT ID: NCT00562783 Completed - Hepatitis C Clinical Trials

A Phase II, Double-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Vitalliver in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

Start date: January 2005
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Cirrhosis is a diffuse lesion characterized by architectural distortion of the liver because of collagen deposition and development of nodules of regenerating hepatocytes. It is an irreversible change that results from diseases characterized by chronic liver injury (Fujimoto, 2000). Cirrhosis alters the pattern of blood flow through the liver and results in impaired perfusion of hepatic lobules with intrahepatic and extrahepatic shunting of blood. This deprives hepatocytes of uniform perfusion by arterial and portal venous blood resulting in both portal hypertension and other consequences of cirrhosis including impaired protein synthesis and altered drug metabolism. The histologic diagnosis of cirrhosis requires the presence of regenerative nodules or pseudolobules completely encircled by fibrosis such as congenital hepatic fibrosis can result in portal hypertension in the absence of cirrhosis (Anthony et al., 1977). The events leading to the development of cirrhosis are generally those of chronic injury with hepatocyte destruction. Acute severe liver injury as in fulminant viral hepatitis does not result in cirrhosis and the liver generally returns to normal after recovery. Cirrhosis can be classified by macroscopic appearance, by cause, and by histologic appearance and location of liver damage. Micronodular cirrhosis is composed of uniform nodules less than 3 mm in diameter, whereas macronodular cirrhosis has varying size nodules greater than 3 mm diameter. Mixed nodular cirrhosis has nodules of both sizes. Some liver diseases such as alcoholic liver disease may present as micronodular cirrhosis and develop larger nodules with subsequent regeneration of hepatocytes. For this reason, many prefer etiologic classification (e.g., alcoholic cirrhosis). The designation of cirrhosis as post necrotic, biliary and portal are still commonly used and imply predominant histologic location of fibrosis. Cirrhosis is an irreversible disease, and attempts should be made to stabilize the patient and to control the cause. Factors that indicate a poor outcome include an elevated prothrombin time that does not correct itself with parenteral vitamin K, upper gastrointestinal bleeding caused by varices, ascites refractory to therapy, increased age of the patient, sever malnutrition, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, a pronounced increase of serum bilirubin in the absence of haemolysis, and heptocellular carcinoma (Yeh et al., 2003). In general, all causes of upper GI bleeding are associated with an increased mortality in patients with cirrhosis. For those with alcoholic cirrhosis who lack portal hypertension, survival is similar to an age-matched cohort if alcohol intake is stopped (Nakamura et al., 1991). If ethanol consumption continues, mortality is higher. Cirrhosis can be present without clinically significant complications and be identified only at autopsy or during evaluation of abnormal liver tests (Mendez et al., 2003). However, for many patients the disease is slowly progressive resulting in one or more complications. The clinical manifestations of cirrhosis are a result of altered hepatic blood flow through the liver with intrahepatic shunting causing impaired perfusion of hepatocytes or portal hypertension with shunting of blood around the liver though portosystemic communications. The major complications of portal hypertension include oesophageal or gastric varices, ascites, portosystemic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal-syndrome (Menon & Kamath, 2000). With impairment of hepatocyte perfusion or reduction of hepatocyte number, altered synthetic function can result in hypoalbuminemia, hypoprothrombinemia, and changes in drug metabolism. Vitalliver is a Chinese medicine which is administered in the form of a suppository, which is uncommon for most Chinese medicines. Medications released from the suppositories are absorbed directly from the circulation around the rectum and then reach the liver via the portal vein. Basic pharmacological studies have shown that Vitalliver has good immunomodulating functions, increases the activities of T-cells, B-cells and NK cells, therefore this formulation may have special values in treating liver diseases.

NCT ID: NCT00558818 Completed - Chronic Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Long-term Study With Clevudine

Start date: June 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

A open-labeled phase lV study with 96 weeks of treatment period. The purpose of this study is to investigate safety and efficacy of clevudine in patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus, HBeAg positive or negative.

NCT ID: NCT00558493 Completed - Chronic Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Switching Study From Lamivudine to Clevudine in the Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Start date: November 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

A multi-center and open study to compare the safety and effectiveness of switching treatment from lamivudine to clevudine for 24 weeks.

NCT ID: NCT00537537 Completed - Clinical trials for Hepatitis B, Chronic

To Evaluate Antiviral Efficacy of Telbivudine in Hepatitis B Antigen Positive (HbeAg-positive) Compensated Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)

Start date: August 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study is to evaluate the antiviral efficacy of add-on adefovir to telbivudine in non-responders to telbivudine monotherapy after 24 and 36 initial weeks. Antiviral efficacy is assessed by hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA non-detectability (PCR <300 copies/ml) by week 104 with CHB.

NCT ID: NCT00536627 Completed - Chronic Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Tolerance of Naked DNA Vaccine in Patients With Chronic B Hepatitis

VAC-ADN
Start date: January 2008
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine if DNA vaccination of chronic HBV patients under treatment with NRTI can restore T-cell responsiveness and delay virologic reactivation after treatment discontinuation.

NCT ID: NCT00536263 Completed - Clinical trials for Hepatitis B, Chronic

PegIntron Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Patients (P05170/MK-4031-327)

Start date: September 2007
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of two dosages of PegIntron for treating hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B compared with the approved dosage, which is PegIntron 1.0 microgram (mcg)/kg given once a week for 24 weeks. This study compares dosages of (1) 1.5 mcg/kg once a week for 24 weeks and (2) 1.5 mcg/kg once a week for 48 weeks with the approved dosage. All subjects are followed for 24 weeks after their treatment ends.