Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04332419
Other study ID # CASE13219
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 3, 2020
Est. completion date September 21, 2020

Study information

Verified date June 2022
Source Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) to positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) to help determine any added advantage of one over the other in relation to a tumor which might assist in further management plans.


Description:

Participants in this study will undergo PET/CT (standard imaging) and PET/MR (additional imaging), within 6 hours after SIRT with Y-90 for palliative treatment of the liver malignancy. Patients will be randomized to receive either of the imaging modalities first, based on the availability of the imaging device, and less than 1 hour apart. Upon acquirement and construction of PET/CT and PET/MR images, a software (MIM SurePlan LiverY90) would be utilized for semi-automatic determination of the liver/tumor contours and calculation of the Y-90 absorbed doses (Gy) in the regions of interest (including within tumor and background liver outlines) using the Local Deposition Method. The primary objective of this study is to assess the agreement between post-Y-90 RE absorbed doses (Gy) in the liver tumor tissues based on PET/CT versus PET/MR imaging. This would permit the comparison of Y-90 tumor absorbed doses, acquired from PET/MR, with the current standard of care PET/CT imaging to verify the data consistency and to validate its application for the prediction of tumor response to treatment. The secondary objective of this study is to assess the agreement between post-Y-90 RE absorbed doses (Gy) in the background liver tissues (surrounding tumors), based on PET/CT versus PET/MR imaging. This would permit the comparison of Y-90 background liver absorbed doses, acquired from PET/MR, with the current standard of care PET/CT imaging to verify the data consistency and to validate its application for the prediction of dose toxicity.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 11
Est. completion date September 21, 2020
Est. primary completion date September 21, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - The patient has a liver malignancy and is scheduled for SIRT with Y-90; AND - The patient is an adult, self-competent, and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: - The patient loses competence, has a condition that questions their ability to provide informed consent independently (e.g. cannot communicate in English), or withdraws consent to participate within any time in the study period; OR - The patient is not eligible to undergo MRI due to the presence of metal devices or implants in their body; OR - Both imaging modalities cannot take place within 6 hours after Y-90 RE; OR - Both imaging modalities cannot take place within 1 hour apart from each other

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
PET/CT
Standard Imaging
PET/MR
Additional Imaging
Radiation:
SIRT with Y-90
SIRT with Y-90 for palliative treatment of the liver malignancy.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Cleveland Ohio

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Reproducibility Coefficient (RDC) Between the Two Imaging Modalities in Liver Tumor Tissues RDC between the two imaging modalities for post-Y-90 Radioembolization (RE) absorbed doses (Gy) in the liver tumor tissues The RDC is the minimum difference between the two measurements that can be considered a true difference, with 95% confidence. Post-op day 0, 1 hour apart
Secondary RDC Between the Two Imaging Modalities in Background Liver Tissues RDC between the two imaging modalities for post-Y-90 RE absorbed doses (Gy) in the background liver tissues
The RDC is the minimum difference between the two measurements that can be considered a true difference, with 95% confidence.
Post-op day 0, 1 hour apart
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06287411 - Role of FAPI PET/MR Combined With Gadoxetate Disodium in Assessing Hepatic Malignancies