HEMORRHOIDECTOMY Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effect of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods on Outcomes After Hemorrhoidectomy
Verified date | May 2024 |
Source | Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this research; To evaluate the effect of preoperative bowel preparation on post-hemorrhoidectomy outcomes. Bowel preparation is a routine practice before surgery in anorectal diseases. This study aims to evaluate the effect of bowel preparation using laxatives or enemas on the patient postoperative pain, analgesic consumption amount, comfort, first defecation time and satisfaction, and to evaluate the satisfaction of the surgical team.
Status | Enrolling by invitation |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | May 30, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | May 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Being a patient who will undergo hemorrhoidectomy surgery with spinal anesthesia - Agreeing to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: - Not accepting participation in the study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Saglik Bilimleri Üniversitesi | Ankara |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi |
Turkey,
• De la Garza M.,.Counihan T.C. Complications of hemorrhoid surgery. Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery 24 (2013) 96-102
Sammour T, Barazanchi AW, Hill AG; PROSPECT group (Collaborators). Evidence-Based Management of Pain After Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy Surgery: A PROSPECT Review Update. World J Surg. 2017 Feb;41(2):603-614. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3737-1. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain level | To evaluate pain; A numerical rating scale will be used, numbered 0-10, 0: no pain, 10: unbearable pain (1-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, 7-10 severe). | postoperative 2, 6, 10, 20, 24. hours and at the first defecation assessed up to 72 hours | |
Secondary | Analgesic consumption amount | Total amount of analgesic used in the first 24 hours postoperatively | First 24 hours postoperatively | |
Secondary | Comfort level | To evaluate comfort; Perianesthesia comfort scale will be used.Perianesthesia Comfort Scale (PCS) consists of 24 items that reflect the individual's general thought process about the perianesthesia period and question his/her self-conception and feelings.
Each statement in the scale has a Likert-type scoring ranging from 1-6, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". The highest total score that can be obtained from the scale is 144, and the lowest total score is 24. The average value is determined by dividing the total score obtained by the number of scale items and the result is stated in the 1-6 distribution. A low score indicates poor comfort and a high score indicates good comfort. |
It will be evaluated once at the 24th postoperative hour. | |
Secondary | Satisfaction level of patients | To evaluate the satisfaction of patients and the surgical team; A numerical evaluation scale (numbered between 0-10, 0: not at all satisfied, 10: very satisfied) will be used. | It will be evaluated once at the 24th postoperative hour. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04361695 -
Preemptive Analgesia for Hemorrhoidectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04288349 -
IntraopeRativE Use of periNeal Block for Hemorrhoidectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03938714 -
Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Grade III and IV Disease:Harmonic Scalpel Compared With Conventional Technique
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00932542 -
Eutectic Mixture for Hemorrhoidectomy Postoperative
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03848468 -
Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.
|
N/A |