Hemodynamic Study With PRAM of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device

Hemodynamic Instability Clinical Trial

Official title:

Hemodynamic Study With Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device in Gynecological Surgery

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02918526
• Other study ID #: AOUCareggi
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: September 24, 2016
• Last updated: September 28, 2016
• Start date: October 2016
• Est. completion date: June 2017

Study information

• Verified date: September 2016
• Source: Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
• Contact: Alessandro Di Filippo, MD
• Phone: 3397219337
• Email: adifilippo[@]unifi.it
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Italy: Ethics Committee
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study will be to record the hemodynamic response measured by traditional methods (non-invasive blood pressure and ECG) and Pressure Recording Analytical Method in patients undergoing laryngeal mask placement compared with the hemodynamic response measured in patients undergoing laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation for performing surgery in gynecological area and assess the differences with the two methods.

Description:

Introduction Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation may cause significant hemodynamic changes in the patient and induce cardiovascular complications.

Numerous studies have sought methods to reduce this risk (1-5). The extraglottic not involving either laryngoscopy or their passage through the vocal cords, have proven protective of the possible cardiovascular complications resulting from the placement of respiratory prosthesis (6,7).

Measurements of hemodynamic changes resulting from the procedures for airway management with extraglottic have not previously been carried out.

The MostCare (Vytech, Vygon Italia srl, Padova, Italy) is a monitor provided for more than 10 years at the obstetric gynecological anesthesia unit able to evaluate the hemodynamic changes in a patient based on the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM).

This is a measurement method of the cardio-circulatory performance of a patient that does not require calibration and / or insertion of a pre-estimated data because the method of analysis of the wave form of the arterial pressure is developed completely a priori (8). The measurement derives from the simultaneous analysis of the components of a pulsatile flow and the continuous flow as a ratio between the area under the curve of the pulsatile portion of the systolic pressure and the characteristic impedance Z (t). The PRAM method has proven effective in many clinical settings (9).

The Medical Device (DM) will be used in accordance with the indications of use for which it has acquired the CE mark. A morphology detection system linked to high blood pressure curve detected through non-invasive Masimo oximetry system supplied to the Hospital will be used Purpose of the study The purpose of the research will be to record the hemodynamic response measured by traditional methods (non-invasive blood pressure and ECG) and PRAM method in patients undergoing placement laryngeal mask compared with the hemodynamic response measured in patients undergoing laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation for performing surgery in gynecological area and assess the differences with the two methods

Methods This will be a prospective observational study. Data will be collected from all consecutive patients undergoing general anesthesia for gynecologic surgery for a period of 3 months or until the minimum number of 94 patients (see section statistical analysis).

In the operating room the patient will undergo to active pre-warming with hot air, peripheral venous cannulation and premedication with midazolam 0,04 mg/kg, and fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg body weight. After the positioning of the standard monitoring systems (ECG, Non-Invasive Blood Pressure, Pulseoximetry, Neuromuscular Transmission), the signal from the Pulseoximetry will also be analyzed by the MostCare monitoring system that allows to apply the measuring method PRAM noninvasively.

After 3 minutes of high flows O2, propofol 2 mg/kg body weight and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg body weight will be administered sequentially to the patient. Anesthesia will be maintained with propofol continuous infusion (9-12 mg/kg body weight /hour) and remifentanil continuous infusion (0.2 mcg/kg body weight /minute ). At the disappearance of the adductor muscle response to electrical stimulation of the thumb "Train of four" (TOF) applied to the ulnar nerve the positioning maneuver of the respiratory device will be performed:

• with direct laryngoscopy in the case of endotracheal intubation

• with direct insertion in the case of laryngeal mask placement. Proper placement will be evaluated by chest auscultation, spirometry and analysis of the concentration and the carbon dioxide curve in exhaled gases.

The data obtained from the PRAM and the usual monitoring will be recorded on a special sheet by an outside observer.

In the case of failed positioning of the respiratory device, the procedure will be repeated and in case of further failure will proceed as indicated by national and hospital guidelines (10), but the patient will still be excluded from the study ..

The choice of the respiratory device will depend on the type of intervention scheduled in the operating program.

The hemodynamic and monitoring data will be recorded every minute for 5 minutes for each patient.

The study duration will be 3 months (or in any case until reaching the minimum number of 94 cases).

The patients will be divided, retrospectively, in two groups according to the type of device used for airway management.

The two groups will be compared on the basis of age and anthropometric parameters. An analysis of the hemodynamic response of the two groups of patients to the positioning of the respiratory device will then conduct.

Statistical analysis A recent study (11), that analyzed the cardiac index changes in response to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope Mcintosh in comparison to the video laryngoscope laryngoscopy, showed a difference of 1 L/min/m2 (from 3.1±0.6 to 4.3±1.4 with laryngoscope McIntosh vs 3.0±0.3 to 3.2 ± 1.1 with videolaryngoscope).

Therefore, to test the hypothesis that the cardiac index difference using the airway management with traditional intubation compared to the use of the laryngeal mask is greater than or equal to 1 L/min/m2, having fixed the first type error to the 5% and the study power to 80%, it is possible to calculate that the sample size needed for a one-tailed test is represented by 47 patients per group.

The average of the data collected in each group of patients will be compared with Student's t test.

Expected results To verify, in two of homogeneous population groups for anthropometric and clinical data, the least impact on the cardiovascular system produced by the placement of laryngeal mask compared to that induced by endotracheal intubation with conventional laryngoscopy taking advantage of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring system of the pulse oximetry MostCare (methodology PRAM) ever tested in this field.

Also to check the hemodynamic impact of any repeated attempts to both of the above maneuvers for airway management.

Ownership of the results will be accredited by the principal investigator on behalf of the AOU Careggi and the University of Florence as headings of him which has neither received nor will receive any fee for the conduct of the study.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 94
• Est. completion date: June 2017
• Est. primary completion date: March 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years to 50 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria:

• Patients scheduled for elective gynecological surgery under general anesthesia

• Age >18 <50 years

• Presence of informed consent in the clinical record

• Belonging to risk classes ASA 1 - ASA 2

Exclusion criteria:

• Hypertension

• Heart failure

• Treatment with beta blockers, Ca channel blockers, antihypertensives, vagolytic

• Hypo/hyperthyroidism and its treatment

• Adrenal insufficiency and its treatment

• Autonomic neuropathy

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Hemodynamic Instability
• Intubation Complication

Intervention

Device:
• airway management
airway management with Laryngeal Mask or Oro Tracheal Intubation

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

References & Publications (11)

Abdelgawad AF, Shi QF, Halawa MA, Wu ZL, Wu ZY, Chen XD, Yao SL. Comparison of cardiac output and hemodynamic responses of intubation among different videolaryngoscopies in normotensive and hypertensive patients. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2015 Jun;35(3):432-8. doi: 10.1007/s11596-015-1449-7. Epub 2015 Jun 14. — View Citation

Agrawal G, Agarwal M, Taneja S. A randomized comparative study of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic changes on insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and conventional tracheal intubation in pediatric patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;28(3):326-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.98325. — View Citation

Daabiss M, Hashish M. Effects of lornoxicam on the hemodynamic and catecholamine response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):783-6. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1017-4. Epub 2011 Mar 3. — View Citation

Efe EM, Bilgin BA, Alanoglu Z, Akbaba M, Denker C. Comparison of bolus and continuous infusion of esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation and sternotomy in coronary artery bypass graft. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;64(4):247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Oct 25. — View Citation

Lee SY, Min JJ, Kim HJ, Hong DM, Kim HJ, Park HP. Hemodynamic effects of topical lidocaine on the laryngoscope blade and trachea during endotracheal intubation: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):668-75. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1812-z. Epub 2014 Mar 12. — View Citation

Min JH, Chai HS, Kim YH, Chae YK, Choi SS, Lee A, Choi YS. Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction: remifentanil vs. lidocaine with esmolol. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Mar;76(3):188-92. — View Citation

Perelló-Cerdà L, Fàbregas N, López AM, Rios J, Tercero J, Carrero E, Hurtado P, Hervías A, Gracia I, Caral L, de Riva N, Valero R. ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Attenuates Systemic and Cerebral Hemodynamic Response During Awakening of Neurosurgical Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul;27(3):194-202. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000108. — View Citation

Petrini F, Accorsi A, Adrario E, Agrò F, Amicucci G, Antonelli M, Azzeri F, Baroncini S, Bettelli G, Cafaggi C, Cattano D, Chinelli E, Corbanese U, Corso R, Della Puppa A, Di Filippo A, Facco E, Favaro R, Favero R, Frova G, Giunta F, Giurati G, Giusti F, Guarino A, Iannuzzi E, Ivani G, Mazzon D, Menarini M, Merli G, Mondello E, Muttini S, Nardi G, Pigna A, Pittoni G, Ripamonti D, Rosa G, Rosi R, Salvo I, Sarti A, Serafini G, Servadio G, Sgandurra A, Sorbello M, Tana F, Tufano R, Vesconi S, Villani A, Zauli M; Gruppo di Studio SIAARTI "Vie Aeree Difficili"; IRC e SARNePI; Task Force. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):617-57. English, Italian. — View Citation

Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug;30(8):1834-41. — View Citation

Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Aug;95(2):159-65. Epub 2005 May 13. — View Citation

Sun HL, Wu TJ, Ng CC, Chien CC, Huang CC, Chie WC. Efficacy of oropharyngeal lidocaine instillation on hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Mar;21(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.028. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Cardiac Index (L/min/m2)	Cardiac Index (L/min/m2) measured with Pulse Recording Analytic Method	for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes
Secondary	Heart rate (bpm)		for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes
Secondary	Blood pressure (mmHg)		for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes
Secondary	Cardiac Output (CO) (L/min)		for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes
Secondary	Stroke Volume (SV) (ml/beat)		for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes
Secondary	Stroke Volume Index (SVI) (ml/beat /m2)		for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes
Secondary	Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) (dynes•s /cm5)		for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes
Secondary	Cardiac Cycle Efficiency (CCE) (a dimensional value)		for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes
Secondary	Cardiac Power Output (CPO) (W).		for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia	Yes