View clinical trials related to Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic.
Filter by:The study will be a multicenter randomised controlled trial of the use of irrigation fluid of body temperature versus irrigation fluid of room temperature during burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma.
Setup of comparative trial The goal of this study is to determine whether one surgical treatment for chronic subdural hematoma is better than the other. Patients with a clear indication for drainage of subdural hematoma (as stated under "Surgical options") will be randomized into three groups. One group will receive twist drill craniostomy followed by drainage during 48 hours. One group will undergo burr hole drainage (single if possible, double if necessary) with irrigation and drainage during 48 hours postoperatively. One group will undergo a minicraniotomy with trephine or craniotome, with wide opening of all visible membranes, rigorous irrigation and placement of Jackson-Pratt drain, followed by closed system draining during 48 hours. Postoperative results and complications will be compared between the three groups.
Chronic subdural hematomas are a frequent neurosurgical pathology in the elderly. Gold standard is surgical evacuation of these hematomas. Physiopathology of chronic subdural hematoma involves numerous inflammatory processes which could be inhibited by steroids.
This is a single center single arm study of 50 patients to 1) determine the safety of tranexamic acid in the chronic subdural hematoma population following surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematomas and 2) determine if the use of oral tranexamic acid reduces the rate of ipsilateral recurrence following drainage of chronic subdural hematomas. This will be compared to historical controls. This study intends to be a prerequisite to a large nationally funded randomized control trial.
An open study evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of a microwave-based device, Medfield Strokefinder MD100, to detect chronic subdural hematoma, by comparing measurements on patients recruited for surgery of chronic subdural hematoma to an age- and gender-matched group of healthy volunteers.
To evaluate the clinic effects and security of oral administration of Atorvastatin on chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).
There are numerous reported ways to treat chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH) and practice is still differing considerably between departments. Except for a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) that found that postoperative subdural drainage was better than no drain, there is no higher level evidence. Another recent RCT did not replicate these findings, but the study was severely underpowered. Aim of this population based study is to compare clinical results (reoperation rates, complications, perioperative death, and survival) between neurosurgical departments treating CSDH with different treatment policies.
The aim of our study is to investigate in randomized controlled fashion whether the recurrence and complication rate, after insertion of subperiosteal drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma, is higher compared to insertion of subdural drainage. We hypothesize that patients treated with a subperiosteal drainage do not show higher recurrence rates than those treated with a subdural drainage, and suffer less complications.
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) is one of the most common bleedings of the head. These hematomas develop after minor head trauma and increase in size over weeks. Patients usually present with headaches, gait disturbances, language problems or confusion. The state of the art treatment of a symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma is to remove the hematoma by burr hole trepanation. The optimal follow-up for operated patients remains controversial. Due to the known high rate of a second hematoma at the same place (usually within weeks), one strategy is to perform serial computer tomography scans in order to identify recurrent hematomas early. The radiologic evidence of a second hematoma often leads to reoperation, even if the patient has no, or just slight symptoms. Another strategy after surgical hematoma evacuation is to closely follow the patient with neurological examinations and perform neuroimaging only in case of new symptoms. Advocators of this strategy argue that a follow-up with routine CT scans may be harmful due to additional and maybe unnecessary surgeries and hospital days in a patient population marked by advanced age and fragility. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the role of computer tomography scanning in the postoperative follow-up after removal of a chronic subdural hematoma. Participants of this study will be allocated by chance to one of two study groups: Patients allocated to group A will receive a computer tomography scan on day 2 and again on day 30 after surgery in addition to a clinical examination. Patients allocated to group B will be examined clinically on day 2 and day 30 without computer tomography. All patients will undergo a final clinical examination after 6 months. The study will recruit 400 patients.