Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05398315 |
Other study ID # |
22-01-4352 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
April 1, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2023 |
Source |
Wayne State University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This project aims to develop a maximally effective, computer-delivered brief intervention
(CDBI) for reducing heavy alcohol use. More specifically, the investigators will examine
outcomes of different versions of a CDBI in which the presence/absence of empathic
statements, the gender of the narrator, the presence/absence of a narrator backstory, and the
use/non-use of motivational interviewing techniques are systematically manipulated using a
factorial design. Participants (352 heavy drinkers) will be randomly assigned to 1 of 16
intervention conditions, representing all combinations of the 4 variables being manipulated.
The investigators hypothesize that there will be significant main effects of all four factors
being manipulated on (a) subjective reactions to the CDBI and (b) alcohol outcomes at 1-month
follow-up
Description:
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health estimates that 19.3 million individuals ages 12
and over met criteria for an alcohol use disorder in the past year, fully 87.4% of whom
neither received any treatment in the past 12 months, nor wanted it. Recognition of this
tremendous gap has led to efforts, both nationally and internationally, to implement
proactive screening and brief intervention. Brief interventions have proven efficacious in
reducing unhealthy drinking with effect sizes in meta-analyses ranging from small to
moderate. Brief interventions are also uniquely applicable to non-treatment-seeking
populations, who may refuse extended treatment but accept a minimal, opportunistic
intervention. However, the public health impact of brief interventions has been limited by
substantial difficulty with implementation. Further, positive overall findings in
meta-analyses obscure the results of multiple rigorous efficacy trials showing no brief
intervention effect on alcohol use. Both of these issues-the implementation challenges and
the inconsistency in outcomes-suggest that changes are needed before brief alcohol
interventions can meet their full potential.
Technology offers exciting potential in both respects. First, computer-delivered brief
interventions (CDBIs) can be presented inexpensively, with perfect fidelity, and without the
need for training or provider time. Second, their replicability, flexibility, and modularity
makes them the perfect platform for (a) isolating the active ingredients that are associated
with positive outcomes; and thereby (b) continually optimizing CDBIs to achieve cumulative
increases in efficacy.
The overall goal of this research is to develop a maximally effective and replicable CDBI for
reducing heavy alcohol use. To accomplish this, the investigators will use the Multiphase
Optimization Strategy (MOST), an efficient method for optimizing intervention content that
uses factorial designs to evaluate main and interaction effects of specific intervention
components. The selection of components will be guided by: (a) Common Factors Theory, which
highlights the tremendous contribution of relational factors, such as empathy, alliance and
positive regard to therapy outcomes, but which is of unknown relevance to CDBIs; and (b) the
Media Equation Theory, which suggests that people automatically respond to computers in
social ways, particularly when those computers replicate human characteristics. Guided by
this literature, the investigators will examine outcomes of a CDBI in which empathic
statements, the gender of the narrator, the presence/absence of a narrator backstory, and the
use/non-use of motivational interviewing techniques are systematically manipulated using a
factorial design.
Specific aims are as follows:
1. Develop 16 distinct, time-consistent, computer-delivered sessions representing all
possible combinations of the following four factors (each of which will be binary; i.e.
either present vs. absent or male vs. female): (1) narrator gender, (2) empathic
statements and reflections, (3) narrator backstory, and (4) use of motivational
techniques.
2. Evaluate main and interaction effects of the five factors by randomly assigning 352
heavy drinkers to the 16 sessions (each of the four factors being presented to half of
the participants) and evaluating (1) subjective reactions to the CDBI at baseline and
(2) alcohol use at 1-month follow-up.
Hypothesis 1. Subjective reactions to the CDBI, disclosure of alcohol use and consequences,
and motivation to reduce alcohol use will be higher and alcohol use at follow-up will be
lower in the presence of (1) empathic statements, (2) a narrator backstory and (3)
motivational techniques. The effects of narrator gender will be examined in an exploratory
way (i.e., no a priori hypotheses).
Hypothesis 2. Subjective reactions will be more positive, disclosure and motivation to reduce
alcohol use will be higher, and alcohol use at follow-up will be lower when the two
relational factors (empathy and narrator backstory) are combined with the presence of
motivational content.