Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00784043
Other study ID # MED-EL NA 013
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 2004
Est. completion date February 2017

Study information

Verified date April 2018
Source Med-El Corporation
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and document longitudinal efficacy in young children implanted bilaterally with MED-EL COMBI 40+ / PULSARCI100/SONATATI100 cochlear implant systems.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 37
Est. completion date February 2017
Est. primary completion date September 2009
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 12 Months to 36 Months
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Between 12 and 36 months of age at time of implantation

- Profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss

- English as the primary language in the home

- Realistic expectations of guardians

- Child must be enrolled in a post-operative rehabilitative/educational program that supports the use of cochlear implants and the development of auditory-based skills

- Willing and available to comply with all scheduled procedures as defined in the protocol

Audiological:

- Profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with average thresholds between ears of 90 dB HL or greater at 1000 Hz and above, and must demonstrate minimal functional benefit from conventional amplification

- Behavioral test measures must include unaided threshold measures for the right and left ears using insert earphones; left-alone and right-alone aided sound field threshold measurements; and aided and unaided speech-awareness / detection thresholds (for each ear individually)

- Children accepted into the study must be able to demonstrate a consistent response to sound. If a child has no measurable hearing, he/she must be able to demonstrate a consistent response to vibrotactile stimuli.

- All children must have completed an appropriate trial period with optimally fit amplification prior to inclusion in the study.

Medical:

- Good general health status, as judged by Primary Investigator

- Patent cochleae bilaterally, as indicated by radiological evaluation

- No contraindications for surgery, in general, or cochlear implant surgery in particular

Exclusion Criteria:

- Prior experience with any cochlear implant system

- Younger than 12 months or older than 36 months at time of implantation

- Audiological: Presence of otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonic, indicating possible condition of auditory neuropathy

Medical:

- Evidence of ossification that would prevent full insertion of the standard C40+ / PULSARCI100 /SONATATI100 electrode array in the cochlea(e) to be implanted, as indicated by radiological evaluation

- Abnormal or malformed cochlea(e) to be implanted

- Severed or non-functional auditory nerve in the ear(s) to be implanted

- Central auditory lesion

- Cognitive and/or neurological dysfunction

- Auditory neuropathy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Cochlear Implant
Bilateral Implantation in children

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada London Health Sciences Centre London Ontario
United States Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta Georgia
United States Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio
United States Callier Center Dallas Texas
United States Dallas Otolaryngology Associates Dallas Texas
United States Texas Children's Hospital Houston Texas
United States Nemours Children's Clinic Jacksonville Florida
United States Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin
United States Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk Virginia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Med-El Corporation

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

References & Publications (72)

Au DK, Hui Y, Wei WI. Superiority of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral cochlear implantation in tone discrimination in chinese patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003 Jan-Feb;24(1):19-23. — View Citation

Au, D., Hui, Y., Wei, W, & Wong, B. (2002). Speech recognition between bilaterally and unilaterally cochlear implanted and hearing aid fitted users. In Kubo, T., Takahashi Y., & Iwaki, T. (Ed.) Cochlear implants - an update. The Hague: Kugler.

Balkany T, Boggess W, Dinner B. Binaural cochlear implantation: comparison of 3M/House and Nucleus 22 devices with evidence of sensory integration. Laryngoscope. 1988 Oct;98(10):1040-3. — View Citation

Beijen JW, Snik AF, Mylanus EA. Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jun;28(4):479-85. — View Citation

Brown KD, Balkany TJ. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):315-8. Review. — View Citation

Caleffe-Schenck, N, Franz, D. (2004). Checklist of Auditory Communication Skills. Volta Review 104(3): 175-196.

Das S, Buchman CA. Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Oct;13(5):290-3. Review. — View Citation

Dorman MF, Dahlstrom L. Speech understanding by cochlear-implant patients with different left- and right-ear electrode arrays. Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):191-4. — View Citation

Dunn, L, Dunn, L. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Third Edition. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

Erber, N. (1982). Auditory Training. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association.

Fenson, L, Dale, P, Resnick, J, Thal, D, Bates, E, Hartung, J, Pethick, S, Reilly, J. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's Guide and Technical Manual. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H. Brokes Publishing Company.

Gantz BJ, Tyler RS, Rubinstein JT, Wolaver A, Lowder M, Abbas P, Brown C, Hughes M, Preece JP. Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Mar;23(2):169-80. — View Citation

Goldman, R, Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation Second Edition. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):524-41. — View Citation

Green JD Jr, Mills DM, Bell BA, Luxford WM, Tonokawa LL. Binaural cochlear implants. Am J Otol. 1992 Nov;13(6):502-6. — View Citation

Haskins, H. (1949). A phonetically balanced test of speech discrimination for children. Master's Theis. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

In Kim, C, Chang, S, Lim, D, (eds). Updates in cochlear implantation. Adv. Otorhinolarygol, Basel: Karger.

Jerger, S, Jerger, J. (1984). Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test. St. Louis, Missouri: Auditec of St. Louis.

Kaufman, N. (1995). Kaufman Speech Praxis Test for Children. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University Press.

Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Osberger MJ. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 1995 Oct;16(5):470-81. — View Citation

Kong W, Yu L, Xu Y, Yue J, Xiong X, Zhu L, Duan J. [Benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation on congenital prelingually deafened Chinese-speaking children]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Oct;17(10):577-9. Chinese. — View Citation

Kühn-Inacker H, Shehata-Dieler W, Müller J, Helms J. Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Oct;68(10):1257-66. — View Citation

Laback B, Pok SM, Baumgartner WD, Deutsch WA, Schmid K. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear. 2004 Oct;25(5):488-500. — View Citation

Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Müller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Böhm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68. — View Citation

Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Zerbi M, van den Honert C, Finley CC, Farmer JC Jr, McElveen JT Jr, Roush PA. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):758-61. — View Citation

Lawson, D, Wilson, B, Zerbi, M, Finley, C. (1999). Fourth quarterly progress report: Speech processors for auditory prostheses. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105.

Lawson, D, Zerbi, M, Wilson, B. (1998). First quarterly progress report: Speech processors for auditory prostheses. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105.

Lawson, D., Wilson, B., Zerbi, M., & Finley, C. (1996). Fifth Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-5-2103. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/Speech ProcessorsforAuditoryProstheses%20DC52103/qpr5/qpr5.html.

Lawson, D., Wilson, B., Zerbi, M., & Finley, C. (1999). Fourth Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/Speech ProcessorsforAuditoryProstheses%20DC82105/SpeechProcessorsWilson4DC82105.pdf

Lawson, D., Zerbi, M., & Wilson, B. (1998). First Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/SpeechProcessorsfor AuditoryProstheses%20DC82105/qpr1/qpr1a.html

Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Peters R, Lake J, Johnstone P, Yu G. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5):648-55. — View Citation

Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1565-74. — View Citation

Mawman DJ, Ramsden RT, O'Driscoll M, Adams T, Saeed SR. Bilateral cochlear implantation--a case report. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;57:360-3. — View Citation

Müller J, Schön F, Helms J. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 2002 Jun;23(3):198-206. — View Citation

Müller, J., Schoen, F., & Helms, J. (2000). Bilateral cochlear implant - new aspects for the future? In Kim, C. S., Chang, S. O. & Lim, D. (Ed.) Updates in cochlear implantation. Adv. Otorhinolarygol., Basel: Karger.

Müller, J., Schön, F., & Helms J. (1998). Binaural cochlear implantation: a case report discussing preliminary results. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 255, 38.

Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):205-14. — View Citation

Offeciers E, Morera C, Müller J, Huarte A, Shallop J, Cavallé L. International consensus on bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Sep;125(9):918-9. — View Citation

Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient. Hear Res. 1990 Oct;48(3):287-90. — View Citation

Pijl S. Single-channel versus bilateral multichannel cochlear implant results: a case report. Ear Hear. 1991 Dec;12(6):431-3. — View Citation

Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M, Mawman D, Proops D, Craddock L, Fielden C, Graham J, Meerton L, Verschuur C, Toner J, McAnallen C, Osborne J, Doran M, Gray R, Pickerill M. Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):988-98. — View Citation

Reynell, J, Gruber, C. (1990). Reynell Developmental Language Scales. Los Angeles, California: Western Psychological Services.

Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):763-73. — View Citation

Schauwers K, Gillis S, Daemers K, De Beukelaer C, De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Govaerts PJ. Normal hearing and language development in a deaf-born child. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):924-9. — View Citation

Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):197-204. — View Citation

Schoen F, Mueller J, Helms J, Nopp P. Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol. 2005 May;26(3):429-37. — View Citation

Schön F, Müller J, Helms J. Speech reception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Sep;23(5):710-4. — View Citation

Schön, F, Mueller, J, Helms, J. (1999). Results of bilateral cochlear implantation. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 156:106.

Seeber BU, Baumann U, Fastl H. Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Sep;116(3):1698-709. — View Citation

Semel, E, Wiig, E, Secord, W. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Fourth Edition. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation

Senn P, Kompis M, Vischer M, Haeusler R. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors. Audiol Neurootol. 2005 Nov-Dec;10(6):342-52. Epub 2005 Aug 5. — View Citation

Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2005 May;203(1-2):134-43. — View Citation

Stark T, Engel A, Borkowski G. [Bilateral cochlea implantation in varying duration of deafness]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2004 Jan;83(1):20-2. German. — View Citation

Stark, T, Müller, J, Vischer, M, Schön, F, Senn, P, Engel, A, Kompis, M, Hildmann, H, Helms, J. (2002). Multicenter study on bilateral cochlear implantation. In Kubo, T, Takahashi, Y, Iwaki, T, (eds.) Cochlear implants - an update. The Hague: Kugler.

Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Barton GR, Bloor KE. A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Nov;128(11):1255-62. — View Citation

Truy E, Ionescu E, Ceruse P, Gallego S. The binaural digisonic cochlear implant: surgical technique. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Sep;23(5):704-9. — View Citation

Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Witt SA, Preece JP. Update on bilateral cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Oct;11(5):388-93. Review. — View Citation

Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Parkinson AJ, Wolaver A, Preece JP, Witt S, Lowder MW. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):80S-89S. — View Citation

Tyler RS, Witt SA, Dunn CC. Trade-offs between better hearing and better cosmetics. Am J Audiol. 2004 Dec;13(2):193-9. — View Citation

Van Hoesel R, Ramsden R, Odriscoll M. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear Hear. 2002 Apr;23(2):137-49. — View Citation

Van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:233-5. — View Citation

van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jul;102(1):495-507. — View Citation

van Hoesel RJ, Tong YC, Hollow RD, Clark GM. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Dec;94(6):3178-89. — View Citation

van Hoesel RJ, Tyler RS. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1617-30. — View Citation

van Hoesel RJ. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):234-46. — View Citation

van Hoesel, R. J. M., & Clark, G. M. (1999). Speech results with a bilateral multi-channel cochlear implant subject for spatially separated signal and noise. Australian Journal of Audiology, 21, 23-28.

Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Van de Heyning PH, Cochet E, Carpentier H. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Jan;67(1):67-70. — View Citation

Verschuur CA, Lutman ME, Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M. Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):965-71. — View Citation

Williams, K. (1997). Expressive Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Muller JM, Tyler RS, Kiefer J. Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;5:207-49. Epub 2003 Apr 16. Review. — View Citation

Winkler F, Schön F, Peklo L, Müller J, Feinen Ch, Helms J. [The Würzburg questionnaire for assessing the quality of hearing in CI-children (WH-CIK)]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2002 Mar;81(3):211-6. German. — View Citation

Zimmerman-Phillips S, Robbins AM, Osberger MJ. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2000 Dec;185:42-3. — View Citation

* Note: There are 72 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Longitudinal Efficacy in Young Children Implanted Bilaterally With MED-EL COMBI 40+ / PULSARCI100/SONATATI100 Cochlear Implant Systems Speech perception scores will be compared pre-operatively and postoperatively. 60 months post initial stimulation
Secondary Language Acquisition Over Time in Bilaterally Implanted Children. Scores over time on the MacArthur communicative development inventory. 60 months post initial activation
Secondary Speech Production Over Time in Children Implanted Bilaterally With a MED-EL Cochlear Implant. Speech production scores over time on the Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation and the Kaufman speech praxis test for children. 5 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04696835 - fNIRS in Pediatric Hearing Aids N/A
Completed NCT03662256 - Reducing Childhood Hearing Loss in Rural Alaska Through a Preschool Screening and Referral Process Using Mobile Health and Telemedicine N/A
Completed NCT04602780 - Evaluating the Revised WORQ in CI Users
Completed NCT03723161 - Evaluation of the Ponto Bone Anchored Hearing System in a Pediatric Atresia Population
Completed NCT05086809 - Investigation of an Updated Bone-anchored Sound Processor N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03548779 - North Carolina Genomic Evaluation by Next-generation Exome Sequencing, 2 N/A
Completed NCT03428841 - Audiovisual Assessment After Dural Puncture During Epidural Placement in Obstetric Patients N/A
Completed NCT04559282 - Home Test of New Sound Processor N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03345654 - Individually-guided Hearing Aid Fitting
Completed NCT06016335 - MRI-based Synthetic CT Images of the Head and Neck N/A
Completed NCT05165121 - Comparison of Hearing Aid Fitting Outcomes Between Self-fit and Professional Fit for MDHearing Smart Hearing Aids N/A
Recruiting NCT05533840 - Establishment and Application of a New Imaging System for Otology Based on Ultra-high Resolution CT
Terminated NCT02294812 - Effects of Cognitive Training on Speech Perception N/A
Completed NCT04622059 - AUditive Direct In-utero Observation (AUDIO): Prenatal Testing of Congenital Hypoacusis N/A
Recruiting NCT02558478 - Identification of New Genes Implicated in Rare Neurosensory Diseases by Whole Exome Sequencing N/A
Withdrawn NCT02740322 - Validating the Hum Test N/A
Completed NCT01963104 - Community-Based Kiosks for Hearing Screening and Education N/A
Completed NCT01892007 - Evaluation of Cogmed Working Memory Training for Adult Hearing Aid Users N/A
Completed NCT01857661 - The Influence of the Sound Generator Combined With Conventional Amplification for Tinnitus Control: Blind Randomized Clinical Trial N/A
Withdrawn NCT01223638 - The Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among Children With Congenital Hypothyroidism N/A