Effectiveness of Hearing-aid Based Wind-noise Algorithm

Hearing Impairment Clinical Trial

Official title:

Methods of Wind Noise Suppression in Hearing Aids

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00738244
• Other study ID #: 2R44DC007246-02A2
• Secondary ID: R44DC007246
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: August 18, 2008
• Last updated: September 23, 2011
• Start date: November 2007
• Est. completion date: November 2009

Study information

• Verified date: September 2011
• Source: University of Iowa
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Federal Government
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Wind-noise is highly disturbing to hearing impaired individuals wearing hearing aids who wish to participate in outdoor conversations where wind is present or during activities such as walking or running. In these situations, wind noise significantly reduces signal-to-noise ratio and, consequently, the intelligibility of speech and sounds may be significantly impaired. This negative effect is exacerbated with the use of directional microphone schemes in the hearing iads. The objective of this project is to determine the efficacy of the MH Acoustics' multi-microphone wind-noise reduction invention for the digital hearing aids market. MH Acoustics' wind noise reduction technology is unique since it provides instantaneous convergence while maintaining directionality of the microphone array. Current commercial technologies do not provide this feature. We are hypothesizing that, due to the design of the algorithm, speech perception ability and sound quality perception will be better than that available with traditional directional and/or omnidirectional microphone schemes in windy environments.

Description:

Two groups of subjects will be recruited to participate: Normal hearing adults and adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss, ages 18-65. Pure tone audiometrics (re ANSI, 1996) will be done to ascertain the hearing sensitivity through 6ooo Hz. Normal hearing will be defined as thresholds at or better than 20 dB HL (re ANSI, 1996). The only exclusion criterion for the group exhibiting hearing loss is that no thresholds up to and including 3000 Hz will exceed 75 dB, so as to minimize the inclusion of subjects with "dead regions" in the cochlea.

Subjects will be seen for four visits to the laboratory. The first visit will involve documentation of informed consent, and measurement of hearing thresholds. The second, third and fourth visits will consist of testing with the following measures (in random order for each subject) to determine if the various implementations of the wind noise reduction algorithm 1) impact speech perception ability, and/or 2) impact sound quality perception. Each session will take approximately 1.5 hours, with a maximum of six hours over all the sessions. The two speech perception tests that will be utilized include : 1) Connected Speech Test and Hearing in Noise Test, 2) The Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) (Nilsson, Soli, & Sullivan, 1994; Koch, Nilsson & Soli, 1995. Overall Impression of Sound Quality and Ratings of Annoyance will be used as subjective, or self-reported, measures of preference. Overall Impression will be influenced by the audibility and masking effect of the noise bursts, whereas Annoyance ratings are significantly correlated to the high frequency emphasis of the stimulus, a potential impact of the extreme suppression conditions (e.g., -18 dB) (Warner & Bentler, 2002; Miedema & Vos, 2003). Both measures will be analyzed as a function of the different time constants, gain reduction levels, and level of presentation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: November 2009
• Est. primary completion date: November 2009
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Ages 18-75

• Normal or mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss

Exclusion Criteria:

• Thresholds in excess of 75 dB HL

Study Design

Observational Model: Case-Crossover, Time Perspective: Prospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Deafness
• Hearing Impairment
• Hearing Loss

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Wendell Johnson Center, University of Iowa	Iowa City	Iowa

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Iowa	National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Speech Perception as measured by the Connected Speech Test (Cox et al)		Each of three follow-up visits	No
Secondary	Sound Quality		Each of three follow-up visits	No