View clinical trials related to Healthy Volunteers.
Filter by:This is an open-label, single-center, randomized, three-period, two-sequence crossover study in healthy adult subjects to occur at one site in the United States. This study will evaluate the relative Bioavailability (BA) of an enasidenib sprinkle formulation, compared to the reference tablet formulation, when taken in the fasted state. This study will also evaluate the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of the enasidenib sprinkle formulation after a single oral dose in the fed state to assess the food effect. The study will consist of a Screening phase, a Treatment phase, and a Follow-up phone call. Approximately 28 healthy adult subjects (males or non-pregnant females) will be enrolled.
This is a Phase 1, fixed sequence, multiple dose, open-label study of the effect of CTP-543 on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics in healthy female subjects.
This is a Phase 1, single center, single dose, open-label clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of SHR6390 under fasting conditions in healthy caucasian volunteers
This 3-part study will be conducted to evaluate the interaction of vadadustat with sevelamer carbonate, calcium acetate, and Auryxia in healthy male and female participants. A total of 18 participants will be enrolled in each part of the study. Part 1 of the study will be conducted to assess the effect of a single oral dose of sevelamer carbonate (1600 milligrams [mg]) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single oral dose of vadadustat (300 mg). Part 2 of the study will be conducted to assess the effect of a single oral dose of calcium acetate (1334 mg) on the PK of a single oral dose of vadadustat (300 mg). Part 3 of the study will be conducted to assess the effect of a single oral dose of Auryxia® (2 grams) on the PK of a single oral dose of vadadustat (300 mg).
CC-90009-CP-001 is a Phase 1, single-center, open-label, clinical pharmacology study to measure how much CC 90009 gets into the bloodstream, how much is eliminated in urine and stool, and how long it takes the body to get rid of it. In addition, the safety and tolerability of CC 90009 will be evaluated.
This will be the first clinical study of oral administration SMP-100 in healthy subjects. The proposed randomized Phase 1 trial is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending dose study in approximately 72 healthy male and female subjects.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of X842 after administration of single and multiple doses in healthy subjects
This study collects data on microbiological, genetic and environmental factors, as well as lung function parameters (e.g. spirometry, body plethysmography, lung-MRI) to assess the complex interaction of predisposing risk factors for impaired lung development and respiratory diseases.
Pain is a ubiquitous distressing sensory experience and is the most frequent symptom in numerous gastrointestinal disorders including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Visceral pain is especially difficult to treat with conventional medications and new treatments are needed. Recently, the relationship between autonomic nerve system (ANS) and pain has gathered attention because it could represent an effective treatment target for visceral pain. The parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), one of the two main branches of the ANS, is considered to play an important role for analgesia possibly due to vagal nerve-mediated activation of key brain areas implicated in descending analgesia of pain. Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS) can non-invasively modulate vagal nerve and be expected as a new method to treat visceral pain. For example, the preliminary study showed that vagal nerve stimulation experimentally modulated cardiac vagal tone (CVT) and prevented the development of acid-induced oesophageal hyperalgesia. Disturbances in ANS function have been reported not only in IBS patients but also in fibromyalgia and chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Many of these disorders have been associated with differences in brain structure and/or function as demonstrated by the use of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Of note, the investigators have recently shown that these differences in brain structure and function may be in part attributable to the aforementioned disturbance in ANS function, adding weight to the proposition that autonomic neuromodulation may be efficacious in pain disorders. For instance, in healthy participants the investigators have recently shown, using functional connectivity analysis, that higher resting parasympathetic CVT predicts the engagement of a subcortical functional network that is implicated in descending analgesia, thereby supporting the notion that vagal-mediated analgesia is achieved via descending inhibitory pathways1,4. Thus, tVNS seems a reasonable method to treat pain. However, to date, the precise real-time effect of tVNS on brain function, including during the processing of visceral pain is unknown. Hence, the aims of this study are to investigate the real-time effect of tVNS compared to sham stimulus on brain activity whilst experiencing acute oesophageal pain, using fMRI in double-blind, randomised crossover study of tVNS vs sham stimulation in healthy subjects.
The purpose of this study is to assess the bioequivalence of a single dose of fezolinetant test formulation compared to a single dose of fezolinetant reference formulation under fasting conditions. This study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of a single dose of fezolinetant test formulation and a single dose of fezolinetant reference formulation.