View clinical trials related to Healthy Volunteers.
Filter by:Evaluation of the efficacy of different treatment protocols in the management of Oro-Antral Communications.
The primary objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the effect of repeated oral doses of avacopan (30 mg and 60 mg twice daily approximately 12 hours apart [BID]) given under fed conditions on the PK of a single dose of simvastatin (40 mg) in healthy volunteers.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of C16TR for inhalation in healthy participants.
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the palatability and compare acceptability of brensocatib oral solutions.
The purpose of this study is to compare if three forms of study medicine (called ritlecitinib) get processed differently in healthy adults. This study is seeking healthy participants who have: - Aged 18 years or older; - male or female who are healthy as determined by medical assessment; - BMI of 16-32 kg/m2, and a total body weight >45 kg (99 lb). All participants in this study will receive a ritlecitinib oral dose in three different forms (solution, capsule 1 and capsule 2). The study will take up to 2.5 months, including the screening period and follow-up phone call. Participants will have to stay at the study clinic for at least 13 days. There will be 4 periods in total for this study. On day 1 of each period, participants will take one form of Riltecitinib without food for the first three periods and with food for the last period. Participants will have blood samples taken both before and after taking ritlecitinib. A follow-up phone call will be made at 28 to 35 days after the last study period.
Although the cause of persistent non-specific low back pain (LBP) remains unknown, structural and functional alterations of the brain, alterations in the lumbar muscles and dysfunction of the central nervous system have been proposed as underlying mechanisms. In this case-control study, 1) brain structure/function, 2) lumbar muscle function and 3) central pain processing are compared across four groups: 1) healthy participants, 2) recurrent LBP (both during pain flare and during pain remission), 3) chronic LBP and 4) fibromyalgia. According to previous research, healthy participants and fibromyalgia patients are two extremes of a "musculoskeletal pain continuum". Healthy participants representing one extreme of the continuum with no pain and fibromyalgia representing the other extreme of the continuum with chronic widespread pain. It is thought that different LBP populations (i.e. (sub)acute, recurrent, chronic LBP) float between the aforementioned extremes. Past studies already highlighted the need for studies comparing the pathophysiological mechanisms for different pain syndromes to identify common underlying mechanisms across pain syndromes. For this reason, the goal of the current study is to compare alterations in brain structure/function, alterations in lumbar muscle function and alterations in central pain processing across the aforementioned "musculoskeletal pain continuum". It is hypothesized that longer duration of pain (recurrent vs chronic) and the extensiveness of the pain (one location vs widespread pain) are associated with more pronounced alterations in 1) brain structure/function, 2) lumbar muscle function and 3) central pain processing.
This study is a single-dose, open-label, randomized crossover and multiple-dose, open-label study to evaluate the PK of azelaprag in older adult healthy volunteers.
The goal of this clinical study was to learn more about BAY1747846 compared to placebo when given as an injection into the vein in Chinese healthy male participants: - the safety of BAY1747846 when given at increasing single doses - the level of BAY1747846 in the blood over time when given at increasing single doses. To answer the first question, the researchers compared the number and severity of medical problems the Chinese participants had after receiving BAY1747846 at increasing doses and placebo respectively. Doctors kept tracking of all medical problems that happened in the study, even if they did not think they might be related to the study treatments. To answer the second question, the researchers determined: - the (average) total level of BAY1747846 in the blood, also called AUC - the (average) highest level of BAY1747846 in the blood, also called Cmax - how BAY1747846 is removed from the blood, also called clearance (CL).
The main aim of this study is to compare the amount of brigatinib in the blood of healthy adults after they have swallowed one dose either as a solution or as a tablet.
The goal of this clinical study was to learn more about BAY1747846 compared to placebo when given as an injection into the vein in Japanese healthy male participants: - the safety of BAY1747846 when given at increasing single doses - the level of BAY1747846 in the body over time when given at increasing single doses. To answer the first question, the researchers compared the number and severity of medical problems the Japanese participants had after receiving BAY 1747846 at increasing doses and placebo respectively. Doctors keep track of all medical problems that happen in studies, even if they do not think they might be related to the study treatments. To answer the second question, the researchers determined: - the (average) total level of BAY1747846 in the body, also called AUC - the (average) highest level of BAY1747846 in the body, also called Cmax - how BAY1747846 is removed from the body, also called clearance (CL).