View clinical trials related to Head and Neck Cancer.
Filter by:Multicenter randomized controlled phase III study of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab as immunotherapy vs standard follow-up in surgical resectable HNSCC after adjuvant therapy
This is a retrospective study with long term follow up to evaluate the incidence, timing and risk factors of radiotherapy induced hypothyroidism in non-thyroid head and neck cancer patients who were treated with RT alone or in combination with surgery and/or chemotherapy.
The purpose of this research study is to test the combination of the anti-cancer drugs durvalumab, the study drug, and cetuximab as a treatment for metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer. Participants will receive both durvalumab and cetuximab.
A RCT study to compare the efficacy of ONS supplementation with standard dietary advice on nutritional outcome inHNC outpatients undergoing treatment in radiotherapy clinic. IThe study population are all adult HNC outpatients receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy treatments at Radiotherapy Clinic,NCI. Selected patient will be randomized into Control Group and Intervention Group until each group have 20 subjects, where the total of sample will be 40 patients (in consideration of 50% dropouts) and data will be collected at baseline (prior to treatment), week 2, 4, and the final data will be at week 6 or final day of cancer treatment. Study objectives are to determine the efficacy of ONS supplementation in outpatient HNC undergoing treatment in Radiotherapy Clinic, NCI, to determine nutritional outcome (weight loss and BMI, body composition, dietary intake, albumin and hemoglobin level), functional outcome (handgrip strength) and side effect outcome (nutrition impact symptoms) in HNC outpatients given intensive nutrition intervention with outpatients given routine care. This study also want to find association of Intensive nutrition intervention versus routine care in nutrition outcome, functional and side effect outcome in both group. Subjects in intervention group will received standardize ONS supplementation every day during treatments once daily with frequent dietary advice accordingly to the patients condition while control group will received standard routine care which includes frequent dietary advice without supplementation of ONS. Study hypothesis is there is no significant difference in nutritional outcome, functional outcome and side effect outcome between HNC outpatients receiving INI when compared to HNC outpatient receiving routine care undergoing radiotherapy treatment. There is also no association between these two groups in nutritional outcome, functional outcome and side effect outcome.
There are no studies on practitioner-related factors influencing decision-making in the field of carcinology of aerodigestive carcinomas. The objective of the study is to determine what are the anthropo-sociological factors in the surgeon, the oncologists and radiotherapists influencing decision making in ear, nose, and throat carcinology. Special attention will be paid to the practitioner's gender, age, geographical origin, place and institution of training, place of practice, volume of patients treated, access to or without reconstruction by microsurgery, his tendency or aversion to risk taking. - Main objectives : To determine the individual professional and non-professional characteristics influencing physicians' decision-making in oncology of aerodigestive carcinomas between choices: 1. Surgery 2. Radio and / or chemotherapy 3. Support care 4. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and reassessment - Secondary objectives : Identify if certain patient profiles may lead to heterogeneous treatment decisions i.e. Human Papillomavirus status, age, comorbidities, autonomy, etc.
The goal of this interdisciplinary pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a guided imagery intervention to reduce RT-related symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with HNC relative to treatment as usual.
This open, single-arm, exploratory study looked at the efficacy and safety of apatinib in combination with S-1 as second-line treatment of advanced head and neck malignancies.
Informed by a previous trial in general cancer patients, the investigators aim to conduct a multi-centre Phase III explanatory RCT to demonstrate a significant impact of PTSD Coach on levels of anxiety in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, including saliva and hair cortisol as bio-immunological indicators for stress. However, prior to proposing a larger trial requiring 267 patients, the investigators aim to demonstrate feasibility of recruitment and compliance with protocol procedures in a Phase II Pilot of 60 newly diagnosed HNC patients. The EG will receive PTSD Coach + usual care, compared to two control groups (UC and AC). AC will be comprised of a game app (e.g., Tetris, Candy Crush, or Solitaire) and will be structurally equivalent to the EG to control for distraction (attention on something pleasant or a task) and the human factor involved in usage prompting (i.e., same exposure time + contacts with personnel), since either distraction or the human contact with staff may, alone, lower anxiety. From a resource allocation perspective, it is important to know if the positive effects of PTSD Coach are due to the intervention itself or to the use of an app and its usage prompting. The investigators believe that PTSD Coach will be even more effective at reducing anxiety in HNC patients, as it teaches specific CBT techniques and uses psychoeducation already found to be more effective than distraction alone.
This is a prospective pilot study to investigate the potential clinical value of oxygen-enhanced magnetic resonance (OE-MRI) biomarkers in head and neck radiotherapy.
This is an open-label, randomized, phase II trial to test the efficacy of Ibrutinib in combination with either Nivolumab or Cetuximab in the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic head an neck squamous cell carcinoma