Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05931120
Other study ID # REC/RCR & AHS/23/0149
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 8, 2023
Est. completion date February 8, 2024

Study information

Verified date January 2024
Source Riphah International University
Contact imran amjad, phD
Phone 03324390125
Email imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of dry needling (DN) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on pain, range of motion, lower extremity functional status on hamstring tightness in patients with posterior pelvic tilt.


Description:

A study conducted analyzed the effects of a 3-week combined treatment using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on chronic back pain. The findings showed that this short-term combined treatment led to reduced pain levels and improved motor function in Chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. These results suggest that TENS and IASTM could be beneficial as a complementary approach for managing chronic low back pain. In a randomized trial which shows the results by comparing the efficacy of dry needling (DN) and Graston techniques (GR) in treating upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. Both interventions, were administered twice a week for 2 weeks and when combined with conventional treatment and home exercises, showed significant improvements. However, DN demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of the myofascial diagnostic scale, neck disability index, pain rating, and cervical range of motion. These findings highlight the effectiveness of DN in targeting trigger points and optimizing clinical outcomes. A notable lacuna persists in the literature concerning the effects of dry needling (DN) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on patients diagnosed with hamstring tightness and concurrent posterior pelvic tilt. The dearth of comparative research, inadequate incorporation of comprehensive outcome measures, and the paucity of studies targeting this specific patient cohort contribute to this research gap. Addressing this gap would yield valuable insights into the comparative efficacies and outcomes of DN and IASTM pertaining to pain modulation, range of motion enhancement and optimization of lower extremity functional status in this distinct population subset.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 30
Est. completion date February 8, 2024
Est. primary completion date February 8, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Lack of greater or equal to 20 degrees of supine active knee extension - Passive SLR less or equal to 75 degrees - Atraumatic back or knee pain greater or equal to 2 weeks - Individuals willing to participate in the required treatment sessions and follow-up assessments - Posterior pelvic tilt 8.9 standard deviation of 4.5 degree Exclusion Criteria: - History of herniated lumbar disc/radiculopathy - Prior surgery in the hip, knee, or back - Self-reported pregnancy - History of blood borne pathogens/infectious disease/active infection - Metal allergy - Positive instability tests indicative of ligamentous tear - Positive meniscal tests

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Dry needling
dry needling using 50mm or 60mm sized needles based on individual muscle bulk. Targeted dry needling will be performed on the muscles presenting with tight hamstrings. hurdler Hamstring stretch, extended triangular pose 10 repetitions, 3 sets per session and 2 sessions per week for 4weeks. total 8 sessions , each consisting of 40mins
IASTM
Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization tools targeting tight hamstrings. hurdler Hamstring stretch, extended triangular pose 10 repetitions, 3 sets per session and 2 sessions per week for 4weeks. total 8 sessions , each consisting of 40mins

Locations

Country Name City State
Pakistan DHQ Nankana sahib Nankana sahib Punjab

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Riphah International University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Pakistan, 

References & Publications (23)

???. The Effects of Dry Needling on Gait Patterns in Subjects with Hamstring Muscle Fatigue 2021.

Allam NM, Eladl HM, Elruwaili LT, Elruwaili LF, Elbenya TJ, Elanzi EM, Elquobisi FF, Elgadoa HM, Elghaleb MA, Elsaeid MS, Elquarenes RA, Elrashed SM, Elmobarak SS, Elkholi SM, Eid MM, Alanazi AM, Nambi G, Abdelbasset WK. Correlation between hamstring muscle tightness and incidence of low back pain in female students at Jouf University, Saudi Arabia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Nov;26(21):7779-7787. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202211_30127. — View Citation

Ansari NN, Alaei P, Naghdi S, Fakhari Z, Komesh S, Dommerholt J. Immediate Effects of Dry Needling as a Novel Strategy for Hamstring Flexibility: A Single-Blinded Clinical Pilot Study. J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Feb 1;29(2):156-161. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0013. — View Citation

Chintamani R, Metgud S, Heggannavar A. Short term effects of instrument assisted soft tissuemobilisation technique versus Mulligan's bent leg raise technique in asymptomatic subjects with hamstring tightness-a randomised clinical trial. Int J Health Sci Res. 2019;9:50-64.

Clark NG. The Neurophysiological Effects of Dry Needling to the Thoracolumbar Junction Multifidi in Subjects with Low Back Pain and Decreased Hamstring Length: Nova Southeastern University; 2020.

Deshpande K, Dhumale S. Effect of muscle energy technique v/s static stretching on tight hamstring muscles length and pelvic inclination amongst asymptomatic adults

Dhingani M, Mody V. Short Term Effects of Remote Myofascial Release versus Mulligan's Bent Leg Raise on Hamstring and Lumbar Spine Flexibility in College Going Students: An Experimental Study. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy Print-(ISSN 0973-5666) and Electronic-(ISSN 0973-5674). 2022;16(2):106-13.

Doeringer JR, Ramirez R, Colas M. Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Increased Hamstring Mobility. J Sport Rehabil. 2022 Aug 11;32(2):165-169. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0015. Print 2023 Feb 1. — View Citation

Haq K, Riaz H. Comparison of dry needling and Graston technique on Active Myofascial trigger points in upper trapezius. Rawal Medical Journal. 2022;47(1):129-.

Kamble S, Chintamani R, Jagtap V. Short Term Effect of Isolytic Contraction on Hamstring Flexibility in Asymptomatic Subjects with Hamstring Tightness: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2020;11(2).

Kim J, Kim H, Lee J, Lee H, Jung H, Cho Y, et al. Changes in the quadriceps-to-hamstring muscle ratio during wall squatting according to the straight leg raise test angle. Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science. 2019;8(1):45-51.

Kim YK, Cho SY, Lee KH. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization combined treatment on chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(5):895-902. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200369. — View Citation

Naweed J, Razzaq M, Sheraz S, Anwar N, Sadiq N, Naweed S. Comparison of active isolated stretch and post isometric relaxation for improving hamstring flexibility in young healthy adults. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2020;70(3):770-75.

Noreen A, Rashad A, Naeem F, Intikhab R, Angela C, Sonia A, et al. Comparative effect of graston technique and muscle energy technique on the flexibility of hamstring muscle. International Journal of Clinical Skills. 2022;16(8):255.

Osailan A, Jamaan A, Talha K, Alhndi M. Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) versus stretching: A comparison in effectiveness on hip active range of motion, muscle torque and power in people with hamstring tightness. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 11. — View Citation

Putra DP, Sari GM, Utomo DN. Different Effect of Static Stretching and Neurodynamic Technique in Increasing Hamstring Flexibility on Hamstring Tightness. Different Effect of Static Stretching and Neurodynamic Technique in Increasing Hamstring Flexibility on Hamstring Tightness. 2021;86(1):6-.

Raza A, Haq K, Naveed J, Ali S, Rizwan I. Immediate effects of post facilitation stretch technique on straight leg raise with/without thoraco-lumber direct myofacial release in non-symptomatic adults. The Rehabilitation Journal. 2022;6(04):462-7.

Sadat A, Otadi K, Fakhari Z, Nakhostin Ansari N, Bagheri H, Ghorbanpour A. The effects of dry needling on flexibility & electrophysiological indices in healthy men with hamstring tightness: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Tehran University Medical Journal TUMS Publications. 2020;78(7):442-7.

Sanchez-Infante J, Navarro-Santana MJ, Bravo-Sanchez A, Jimenez-Diaz F, Abian-Vicen J. Is Dry Needling Applied by Physical Therapists Effective for Pain in Musculoskeletal Conditions? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3):pzab070. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab070. — View Citation

Sathe SS, Rajandekar T, Thodge K, Gawande V. Comparison between immediate effects of MET and passive stretching techniques on hamstring flexibility in patients with hamstring tightness: An experimental study. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2020;14(4):6857-62.

Shaikh SM, Moharkar AC. Effect of core stability exercises versus Surya Namaskar on hamstring tightness in healthy adults using active knee extension test at the end of 6 weeks: A comparative study. IJAR. 2020;6(3):386-90.

Suhail M, Prakash A, Sonali D, Sangeeta M. Effectiveness of dynamic soft tissue mobilization vs passive stretching to improve hamstring flexibility in stroke patients-A comparative study. 2022.

Vicente-Mampel J, Bautista I, López-Soler J, Torregrosa-Valls J, Gargallo P, Baraja-Vegas L. Acute effects of self-myofascial release compared to dry needling on myofascial pain syndrome related outcomes: range of motion, muscle soreness and performance. A randomized controlled trial. 2021.

* Note: There are 23 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other lower extremity functional scale The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) is a valid patient-rated outcome measure (PROM) for the measurement of lower extremity function.
The maximum possible score is 80 points, indicating very high function. The minimum possible score is 0 points, indicating very low function.
4th week
Primary ROM( Posterior pelvic tilt) The pelvic tilt is the angle between the horizontal plan and a line drawn from the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) in quiet standing. The average ranges of anterior and posterior pelvic tilting are 13.0 ± 4.9°, and 8.9 ± 4.5°, 4th week
Primary ROM(AKE) The Active Knee Extension Test is used to assess hamstring muscle length and the range of active knee extension in the position of hip flexion.The subject is positioned on the examination table in supine, the lower limb that is'nt examined is positioned in stabilised on the support surface. The opposite limb is elevated so that the hip is in 90degrees of flexion and the knees are extended to reach a position perpendicular to the ground. A lag of 20degrees is considered normal from full extension, anything less than 20degrees is considered as hamstrings tightness. This range needs to be measure using a digital inclinometer 4th week
Primary ROM(SLR) The straight leg raise or straight leg lift is a hamstring muscle flexibility test. While the subject is lying on their back, the straight leg is raised as far as possible, and the angle of the leg from the horizontal is measured.
The straight leg raise test measures hamstring tightness. Restricted flexibility in the hamstrings will contribute to lower back, pelvis, hip, and knee malalignment. The straight leg raise test focuses on proximal hamstring tightness. The test is performed passively.
4th week
Secondary Numeric pain rating scale The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable") 4th week
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05008731 - Effect of Botulinum Toxin on Hamstring Contracture and the Occurrence of Cyclops Syndrome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Phase 3
Completed NCT04334772 - Percutaneous Microelectrolysis in Agility, Joint Range and Strength N/A
Completed NCT05866913 - Neurodynamics vs. Stretching in Soccer Players With Short Hamstring Syndrome N/A
Completed NCT03589573 - Effect of Muscle Strength on Hamstring Flexibility in Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Completed NCT03178604 - Classic and Sham Massage on Psychological and Physical Functional Variables in Athletes N/A
Completed NCT03637439 - Neuromodulation in Patients With Hamstring Shortening N/A
Completed NCT04716205 - Mulligan's Bent Leg Raise Technique in Healthy Females N/A
Recruiting NCT04778293 - Effects of Diacutaneous Fibrolysis on Passive Neuromuscular Response N/A
Completed NCT04668092 - Functional DN for Shortened HS Muscle N/A
Completed NCT04193683 - The Effect Of Myofascial Release Technique On Respiratory Parameters in Subjects With Short Hamstring Muscle N/A
Completed NCT04784741 - Effect of Low Amplitude Vibration Therapy on Flexibility of Hamstring Muscle in Athletes of Pakistan N/A
Recruiting NCT05793242 - Immediate and 24-hour Effects of HyperVolt, Body Tempering, and Cupping Compared to Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility N/A
Recruiting NCT04827082 - Effects of Diacutaneous Fibrolysis on Flexibility and Active Neuromuscular Response N/A