Hair Removal Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Investigation of Safety and Efficacy of a Philips Intense Pulsed Light Device for Hair Reduction (Sunstone 2019)
Verified date | October 2022 |
Source | Philips Healthcare |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, single blinded study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Sunstone IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) device to remove hair.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 102 |
Est. completion date | May 20, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | September 23, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Be willing to provide informed consent 2. Have a minimum of 24 hairs in each of the 2x4cm2 treatment area in axilla, bikini line, and leg, by visual inspection 3. Have a minimum of 10 hairs in the 1x2cm2 treatment area in face (upper lip), by visual inspection 4. Have a Fitzpatrick Skin Type I to V, with a melanin index less or equal to 553, as measured by Mexameter MX 18 in the designated treatment areas on face, axilla, bikini, and legs 5. Have natural body hair color that is dark blonde to black in the designated treatment areas 6. Are female subjects 18-65 years of age 7. Be either post-menopausal or surgically sterilized, or using a medically acceptable form of birth control (e.g., oral contraceptives, IUD, contraceptive implant, barrier methods with spermicide or abstinence, etc.). 8. Be willing to participate in all scheduled study visits 9. Be willing to refrain from deliberate exposure to strong sun, products or procedures that would cause the skin to become darker in the designated treatment areas during the treatment phase 10. Be willing to refrain from the use of hair growth inhibitors/accelerators during the course of the study 11. Be willing to refrain from waxing, depilating or epilating of the face (upper lip), axilla, bikini line, and leg during the course of the study 12. Be willing to refrain from using aspirin or NSAIDS (e.g. acetaminophen, ibuprofen, etc.) within 5 days prior to and 5 days after treatment(s) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Have fewer than 8 qualifying treatment areas: 2 in face (upper lip), 2 in axilla, 2 on bikini line, 2 on leg) 2. Have a malignant or pre-malignant pigmented lesion in the area to be treated 3. Have scarring or infection of the area to be treated 4. Have a known history of photosensitivity or use of medication known to induce photosensitivity 5. Are currently pregnant or lactating or planning to become pregnant in the period of the study, per subject report 6. Are currently on a daily dose of aspirin or NSAIDS (e.g. acetaminophen, ibuprofen, etc.) or have taken aspirin and/or NSAID within 5 days prior to treatment that would reduce or increase the sensation of pain 7. Are not willing to abstain from the use of products or light exposure that would induce tanning in the treatment areas during the IPL treatment period (first 10 months) 8. Have a history of immunosuppressive disease (including HIV infection or AIDS) 9. Are on anticoagulative medication or have thromboembolic condition 10. Any form of isotretinoin (such as Accutane or Roaccutane etc.) in the last six months. 11. Have an active implantable device such as a pacemaker, neurostimulator or internal defibrillator 12. Have used waxing or other methods of root hair removal, or photo-epilation within 6 months prior to treatment 13. Have been exposed to strong sunlight or an artificial tanning machine within 4 weeks of enrolment 14. Have a tattoo(s), warts, moles, benign skin lesions, dark pigmented areas, permanent make-up etc. in the treatment areas. 15. Have eczema, psoriasis, lesions, open wounds or any skin affliction in the treatment areas 16. Have a history of keloid scar formation 17. Have a history of herpes outbreaks in the designated treatment areas 18. Have a history of photosensitive epilepsy 19. Have a condition related to hormonal changes like polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) or taking drugs leading to hormonal changes resulting in excessive hair growth like hirsutism and idiopathic hirsutism 20. Have diabetes, or metabolic disease that affects hair growth 21. Taking immunosuppressive medication(s) 22. Have a disease related to photosensitivity, such as polymorphic light eruption (PMLE), solar urticaria, porphyria etc. 23. Have a history of skin cancer, including past basal cell carcinoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma in the designated treatment areas 24. Have a history of any radiation therapy in any of the designated treatment areas 25. Have a history of radiation therapy in non-treatment areas within 5 years 26. Have a history of chemotherapy 27. Have used hair growth inhibitors and/or accelerators within 6 months preceding enrolment 28. Have had laser or electrolysis treatment for the removal of hair in the treatment sites within the last year 29. Have natural body hair colors of white, grey, light to mid-blond, or red in the designated treatment areas 30. Have bleaching of the body hair in the designated treatment areas 6 months prior to study enrolment 31. Have shaved treatment areas within 7 days prior to study enrolment 32. Participating in other clinical studies prior to, or concurrently with this study, that could be deemed to interfere with full and complete participation in this study - as determined by the site Investigator. - |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Sera Collection | Montebello | California |
United States | Sadick Research Group | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Philips Healthcare |
United States,
Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ. Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(5):416-32. — View Citation
Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):869-71. — View Citation
Ravnbak MH. Objective determination of Fitzpatrick skin type. Dan Med Bull. 2010 Aug;57(8):B4153. — View Citation
Shamsuddin K et. al, The reliability of Fitzpatrick Skin Type Chart Comparing to Mexameter (Mx 18) in measuring skin color among first trimester, Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 2016, Vol. 16 (3): 59-65
Town G, Ash C, Dierickx C, Fritz K, Bjerring P, Haedersdal M. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Jul;26(7):799-811. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04406.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Exploratory objective to assess subjective selection of setting compared to device setting | Exploratory objective:
Assess the percentage of subjects who select a setting based on comfort, which is the same setting as indicated by the device. |
Approximately 18 months | |
Primary | Evaluation of safety of the Sunstone IPL device on removal of unwanted hair on face, axillae, bikini area and legs over the course of the treatment (12 treatments) and follow up (12 months). | The analysis of the Primary safety endpoint will be based on the safety population which include all the enrolled subjects with at least one treatment. The primary safety endpoints include the treatment-emerged, anticipated adverse events (e.g. pain/discomfort, anticipated skin reactions.), non-anticipated adverse events, serious adverse events and reasons for discontinuation. Pain/discomfort will be evaluated per treatment per body area using the 5-point pain score grade. The percentage of the top-two scores will be calculated. Skin reactions will be assessed per treatment and body area, and will be described for type, onset, duration and severity. Incidence of adverse events will be summarized by frequency, severity and by relationship to device. Safety data will be summarized with descriptive statistics by body area, time points and clinical sites and combined. | approximately 18 months | |
Primary | Evaluation of the efficacy of the Sunstone IPL device on short-term hair reduction on face, axillae, bikini area and legs, 1 month after the last treatment (12 treatments). | The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction at 1 month post-final treatment per body area. Successful hair reduction is defined as an average reduction in hair count at the given time point, that is greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline hair count. Post-final treatment is defined as time point after the last of 12 treatments. | approximately 11 months | |
Primary | Evaluation of the efficacy of the Sunstone IPL device on short-term hair reduction on face, axillae, bikini area and legs, 3 months after the last treatment (12 treatments). | The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction at 3 months post-final treatment per body area. Successful hair reduction is defined as an average reduction in hair count at the given time point, that is greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline hair count. Post-final treatment is defined as time point after the last of 12 treatments. | approximately 14 months | |
Secondary | 4. Evaluation of the efficacy of the Sunstone IPL device on removal of unwanted hair on face, axillae, bikini area, and legs after the initial, intensive treatment phase at 8 weeks after baseline (2 weeks after the 4th treatment). | Proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction (greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline) at 8 weeks post-baseline (2 weeks after the 4th treatment) per body area. | Approximately 2 months | |
Secondary | 5. Evaluation of the efficacy of the Sunstone IPL device on removal of unwanted hair on face, axillae, bikini area, and legs after the initial, intensive treatment phase at 10 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment). | Proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction (greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline) at 10 weeks post-baseline (4 weeks after the 4th treatment) per body area. | Approximately 4.5 months | |
Secondary | 6. Evaluation of the stable long-term hair reduction efficacy in face, axillae, bikini area and legs, 6, 9 and 12 months after completion of the 12 treatments with the Sunstone IPL device. | Proportion of subjects with successful hair reduction (greater than or equal to 30% relative to baseline) at 6, 9 and 12 months post-final treatment (12 treatments) per body area. | Approximately 22 months | |
Secondary | 7. Assessment of the subjective satisfaction with the treatment results of the Sunstone IPL device s for removal of unwanted hair on face, axillae, bikini area, and legs. | Percent of top-two category answers of 5-point Likert satisfaction scale in assessment of subjective satisfaction with the treatment results in all body areas. | Approximately 22 months | |
Secondary | 8. Assessment of the acceptance of the Philips investigational IPL devices for removal of unwanted hair in each body area. | Percent of top-two category answers in assessment of acceptance of hair reduction, skin smoothness, and comfort after treatment with Philips investigational IPL devices in all body areas. | Approximately 22 months | |
Secondary | Evaluate time course of hair reduction during first four treatments | Evaluate the time course of hair reduction to baseline achieved by the Philips investigational IPL device for each body area during the first four treatments, i.e. during the Intensive Treatment phase. | Approximately 2 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00366964 -
The Efficacy Of The Wavelight Mydon Laser for Hair Removal And Treatment of Leg Veins
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04807205 -
Post Market Study Using The Elite IQ Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01578187 -
Hair2Go Label Comprehension and Usability Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01348789 -
Safety for Frequent Use Conditions of Hair Removal Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01348776 -
The Efficiency of the Hair2Go Device: A Prospective, Open, Label Study With Before-After Design
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01057134 -
Ultrasound Device for Hair Removal
|
||
Completed |
NCT01282866 -
Hair Count Reduction Verification Study With the LightSheer Duet HS Handpiece
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06179186 -
Hair Removal: Intense Pulsed Light Versus Diode Laser
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01529931 -
Long Term Efficiency of the Hair2Go Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01801202 -
Clinical Evaluation of LightSheer Duet 805nm HS Handpiece
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02912013 -
The Efficacy of the Me Mini Device for Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02318654 -
Ice Versus EMLA for Pain in Laser Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03438929 -
Evaluation of Diolaze XL Blended Mode for Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03945383 -
Clinical Investigation of Safety and Effectiveness of Emerald IPLdevice
|
N/A |