Efficacy of Somatropin in Adult Patients With Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency

Growth Hormone Deficiency Clinical Trial

— IGHD  

Official title:

Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial On The Efficacy Of Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy In Adult Patients With Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency (PRO ISO-GHD Study)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00630487
• Other study ID #: A6281282
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: February 28, 2008
• Last updated: February 26, 2013
• Start date: May 2008
• Est. completion date: October 2008

Study information

• Verified date: February 2013
• Source: Pfizer
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Germany: Bundesinstitut fuer Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study will investigate the effect on growth hormone replacement in patients with isolated growth hormone deficiency on body composition, especially visceral fat mass.

Description:

The study was terminated on 15-Dec-2008 due to poor recruitment. Although 9 Patients were enrolled, no patient was randomized nor treated with somatropin. No safety reasons contributed to the termination.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 9
• Est. completion date: October 2008
• Est. primary completion date: October 2008
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Males and females between 18 and 65 years of age

• Isolated growth hormone deficiency

Exclusion Criteria:

• Isolated growth hormone deficiency by childhood onset

• Diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Dwarfism, Pituitary
• Endocrine System Diseases
• Growth Hormone Deficiency

Intervention

Drug:
• Placebo
Patients of Placebo Group will be treated with placebo sub-cutaneous in the same way as Somatropin during the double blind treatment phase. To maintain blind subject will be measured in the same way as the treatment group for IGF-I- Levels. Central lab will randomize placebo patients to dose change or maintenance of dose. This will ensure continued blinding of the study to patients and personnel.
• Somatropin
Fixed doses for patients: MALE: < 45y 0,4 mg, > 45y 0,2mg FEMALE: < 45y 0,5mg, >45y 0,3mg. for the first 4 weeks half of the dose will be given. After that dose will be increased to the targeted maintenance dose according to IGF-I Levels +/- 2 SD of age adjusted reference range. In case of side effects dosage will remain on half-dose (during the first 4 weeks) or reduced to half dose (after the first 4 weeks). At week 52 patients have the opportunity to switch to open label study restarting with half the given fixed dose which will be adjusted to full dose after 4 weeks.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	Pfizer Investigational Site	Bad Aibling
Germany	Pfizer Investigational Site	Muenchen

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Pfizer

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change of Visceral Fat Mass Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning (MRI)	Fat measurements carried out with the subjects lying in a supine position in a MRI scanner. Measurements of regional body fat obtained between the level of the coccygeal bone and the 2nd or 3rd lumbar vertebra.	Baseline, 52 weeks	No
Secondary	Change in Visceral Fat Mass in Subgroups	Change in visceral fat mass in subgroups. Subgroup 1: isolated GHD due to surgery and/or irradiation of pituitary adenoma and suprasellar tumors. Subgroup 2: history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).	Baseline, 52 weeks, 78 weeks	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Anthropometric Parameters (Height)		Baseline, 52 weeks, 78 weeks	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Anthropometric Parameters (Weight)		Baseline, 52 weeks, 78 weeks	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Anthropometric Parameters (Waist Circumference)		Baseline, 52 weeks, 78 weeks	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Alertness (Testbatterie Zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung [TAP]) and Memory (Auditory Verbal Learning Test [AVLT])	Alertness: software-based neuropsychological assessment for response time and errors. Memory: analysis of learning and retention using 5-trial presentation of 15-word list (A), single presentation of interference list (B), 2 postinterference recall trials - 1 immediate, 1 delayed - and recognition of the target words with distractors (C). Performance variables were immediate word span under overload conditions, final acquisition level, amount learned in 5 trials, interference, delayed recall, and recognition (implicit learning).	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure	Blood pressure was measured seated, the subject's arm supported at the level of the heart, and recorded to the nearest mm Hg. The same arm (preferably the dominant arm) was used throughout the trial. The subject was seated for 5 minutes before the blood pressure was obtained. Use of an automated device could have been used for measuring blood pressure.	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Heart Rate	The use of an automated device for measuring pulse rate was acceptable, although, when done manually, pulse rate was measured in the brachial/radial artery for at least 30 seconds.	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No
Secondary	Change in Executive Function and Memory in Subgroups	Change in executive function and memory in subgroups. Subgroup 1: isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD)due to surgery and/or irradiation of pituitary adenoma and suprasellar tumors. Subgroup 2: history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Median reaction time, the total number of errors, the number of omissions and the number of false positive reactions.	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Safety Laboratory Assessments	Prespecified safety laboratory assessments evaluated for change or no change from baseline. Possible responses were Yes/No.	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	Yes
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA)-Index	HOMA index is calculated by 1 of 2 methods: HOMA-Index = fasting insulin measured in microunits per milliliter (µU/ml) times fasting glucose measured in milligrams per deciliter mg/dl) divided by 405 or HOMA-Index = fasting insulin (µU/ml) times fasting glucose measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/l) divided by 22.5.	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (QoL-AGHDA)	Participant self administered questionnaire consisting of 25 items that evoke yes or no answers. A score of 1 is given to each item affirmed and these are summed to give the total score. The maximum score is 25, which represents a poor quality of life. The minimum score is 0, which represents a good quality of life.	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF36)	Participant self administered questionnaire that measures each of the following eight health concepts: Physical Functioning (PF); Role-Physical (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role-Emotional (RE); Mental Health (MH) as well as a reported Health Transition item (HT). Scale range 0 to 100, higher scores indicate a better health-related quality of life.	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)	Participant self-administered questionnaire EQ-5D, a 2 part generic health status instrument. The first part consists of 5 descriptors of current health state: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Scores are assigned on a three-level scale (1= no problem, 2= some problem, 3= extreme problem). The second part was an overall rating of the participant's current health state using a 20 cm Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) with endpoints labelled 'best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'.	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Risk Factors	Change in values of laboratory tests indicative of possible cardiovascular risk factors: high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide)	Baseline, Week 52, Week 78	No

External Links

•   To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.