Granulomatosis With Polyangitis Clinical Trial
— MAINEPSANOfficial title:
A Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Remission MAINtenance Using Extended Administration of Prednisone in Systemic Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis.
Immunosuppressive therapy of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA, Wegener's) and
microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) has transformed the outcome from death to a strong likelihood
of disease control and temporary remission. However, most patients have recurrent relapses
that lead to damage and require repeated treatment associated with long-term morbidity and
death.
Rituximab has been shown to be as effective as cyclophosphamide to induce remission and
maintenance of remission in severe GPA and MPA patients, with an acceptable safety profile .
Although rituximab is becoming the standard of care for maintenance therapy in these
patients, relapse still occurs and the optimal duration of prednisone therapy remains
debated.
On the one hand, most US studies use early withdrawal (6-12 months) because of feared side
effects. On the other hand, most European trials propose late withdrawal (>18 months) given a
lower observed relapse rate on long-term low dose glucocorticoids treatment.
In a systematic review and meta-analysis, glucocorticoids regimen was the most significant
variable explaining the variability between the proportions of ANCA-associated vasculitis
patients with relapses. Nevertheless, it was an indirect estimation of treatment effect
because of the absence of dedicated randomized trial. This meta-analysis concluded that
combined longer-term (i.e. >12 months) use of low dose prednisone or nonzero glucocorticoids
target is associated with a 20% reduction of relapse compared to early withdrawal (i.e. ≤12
months).
The relapse rate in patients with early glucocorticoids (10-12 months) withdrawal was
provided in two studies and was of 37 and 34%, respectively. By contrast, the relapse rate in
patients with late prednisone withdrawal (18-24 months) and receiving rituximab as
maintenance treatment was 14% at 24 months in the MAINRITSAN trial. Of note, the decision to
withdraw glucocorticoids after 18 months was left to physician's discretion in this study and
two thirds of the nonsevere relapses occurred when patients were off prednisone.
The trial detailed here is the first prospective trial evaluating the length of
glucocorticoid administration as remission adjunctive treatment for patients with GPA or MPA.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 146 |
Est. completion date | June 4, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | June 4, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with a diagnosis of MPA or GPA independently of ANCA status, - Patient aged of 18 years or older, - Patients with newly-diagnosed disease or relapsing disease at the time of screening, with an inactive disease defined as a BVAS = 0, - Patients receiving maintenance infusion of rituximab 500 mg at 6 and 12 months after the start of vasculitis induction - Patients receiving 5-10 mg/day of prednisone at screening, - Patient able to give written informed consent prior to participation in the study. - At Inclusion visit day, patient must be between 5 and 10 mg/day prednisone and at randomization visit day (D1), patient must be at 5 mg/day prednisone Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with EGPA, or other vasculitides, defined by the ACR criteria and/or the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference, - Patients with vasculitis with active disease defined as a BVAS >0, - Patients with acute infections or chronic active infections (including HIV, HBV or HCV), - Patients with active cancer or recent cancer (<5 years), except basocellular carcinoma and prostatic cancer of low activity controlled by hormonal treatment, - Pregnant women and lactation. Patients with childbearing potential should have reliable contraception for the all duration of the study, - Patients with other uncontrolled diseases, including drug or alcohol abuse, severe psychiatric diseases, that could interfere with participation in the trial according to the protocol, - Patients included in other investigational therapeutic study within the previous 3 months, - Patients suspected not to be observant to the proposed treatments, - Patients who have white blood cell count =4,000/mm3, - Patients who have platelet count =100,000/mm3, - Patients who have ALT or AST level greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal that cannot be attributed to underlying MPA-GPA disease, - Patients unable to give written informed consent prior to participation in the study. - Patients with contraindication to use rituximab, |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHU Amiens-Hôpital Nord | Amiens | |
France | CHU Angers | Angers | |
France | Clinique Rhône-Durance | Avignon | |
France | Hôpital Jeanne d'Arc | Bar-le-Duc | |
France | Hôpital Avicenne | Bobigny | |
France | Hôpital La Cavale Blanche | Brest | |
France | Hôpital Louis Pradel | Bron | |
France | CHU de Caen - Cote de Nacre | Caen | |
France | Hôpital Louis Pasteur | Chartres | |
France | CHU Estaing | Clermont-Ferrand | |
France | CHU Gabriel Montpied | Clermont-Ferrand | |
France | CHIC Créteil | Créteil | |
France | CHRU François Mitterrand | Dijon | |
France | CHRU François Mitterrand | Dijon | |
France | CHRU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez | Lille | |
France | Centre Hospitalier Croix Rousse | Lyon | |
France | Hôpital Edouard Herriot | Lyon | |
France | Hôpital Edouard Herriot | Lyon | |
France | Hôpital de la Conception | Marseille | |
France | Hôpital de la Conception | Marseille | |
France | Hôpital La Timone | Marseille | |
France | HP Site Belle Isle | Metz | |
France | CHU Nantes - Hôtel Dieu | Nantes | |
France | CHU de Nice - Hôpital Pasteur 2 | Nice | |
France | Hôpital Cochin | Paris | |
France | Hôpital Européen G. Pompidou | Paris | |
France | Hôpital la Pitié Salpêtrière | Paris | |
France | Hôpital Saint Louis | Paris | |
France | Hôpital Haut Lévêque | Pessac | |
France | Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud | Pierre-Bénite | |
France | CH Lyon Sud | Pierre-Bénite | |
France | CH Lyon Sud | Pierre-Bénite | |
France | CHU de Poitiers | Poitiers | |
France | CHRU Rennes - Hôpital Sud | Rennes | |
France | Hôpital Charles Nicolle | Rouen | |
France | CHRU Hautepierre | Strasbourg | |
France | CHU Strasbourg | Strasbourg | |
France | Hopitaux Universaitaire de Strasbourg Hopitaux | Strasbourg | |
France | Hôpital Foch | Suresnes | |
France | CHRU Bretonneau | Tours | |
France | CH de Troyes | Troyes | |
France | CH Valenciennes | Valenciennes | |
France | Hôpitaux de Brabois | Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy | |
France | CH Bretagne Atlantique | Vannes | |
France | CH de Verdun | Verdun |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospices Civils de Lyon |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Relapse-free survival, relapse being defined as BVAS > 0. | rate of relapse-free survival of patients continuing low-dose prednisone treatment until Month 10 VS those who will have prednisone treatment cessation at Month 1, on remission maintenance with Rituximab therapy, after achievement of remission of GPA or MPA, defined as a survival of patients maintaining a BVAS=0 at Month 30, in patient with newly-diagnosed or relapsing GPA or MPA and who will all have received glucocorticoids for 12 months after diagnosis or last flare before inclusion. | from Screening to Month 30. | |
Secondary | Compare the rate of serious adverse events between Inclusion and Month 30 after randomization | Proportion of patients with at least one adverse event between inclusion and Month 30. Percentage of patients with at least one serious adverse event between inclusion and Month 30, corresponding to any adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other adverse event considered "medically significant". Number of deaths, whatever the cause at Month 30. |
from Day 1 to Month 30 | |
Secondary | Compare the rate of predefined severe events related to glucocorticoids between inclusion and Month 30 including osteoporotic fracture and weight gain. | Percentage of patients with at least one predefined severe event corresponding to adverse events of grade 3 to 5 of the Common Terminology Criteria, including severe side effect related to glucocorticoids (infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics, osteoporotic fracture, diabetes requiring medication, cardiovascular event, symptomatic osteonecrosis, psychiatric or mood disorder requiring drug administration, weight gain >10 kg) between inclusion and Month 30 - Weight gain between inclusion and Month 30 |
From Screening to Month 30 | |
Secondary | To compare the rate of vasculitis relapse at Month 30 | Proportion of patients with minor or major vasculitis relapse between inclusion and Month 30 (BVAS >0) and time to first vasculitis relapse | from Day 1 to Month 30 | |
Secondary | To compare the prednisone use between inclusion and Month 30 | Prednisone area under the curve of administrated dose between inclusion and Month 30 | from screening to Month 30 | |
Secondary | To compare variation of the Bone mineral density and markers between inclusion and Month 30 | Variation of the Bone mineral density between inclusion and Month 30 - Variation of the Bone markers including C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and serum procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) between inclusion and Month 30 |
From Screening to Month 30 | |
Secondary | To compare sequelae assessed by BVAS (vasculitis activity) at 30 months | BVAS (vasculitis activity) at 30 months - Variation of BVAS (Vasculitis activity) |
From Screening to Month 30. | |
Secondary | To compare sequelae assessed by the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) at 30 months | Vasculitis Damage Index at 30 months Variation of VDI, |
From screening to Month 30. | |
Secondary | - To compare sequelae assessed by Combined Damage Assessment Index (CDA) at 30 months | Combined Damage Assessment Index at 30 months Variation of CDA (damage), |
From Screening to Month 30. | |
Secondary | - To compare functional disability at Month 30 after randomization (Day 1) in both arms | Variation of HAQ (disability) between inclusion and at Month 30 | From Day 1 to Month 30. | |
Secondary | To compare quality of life at Month 30 after randomization (Day 1) in both arms | - Variation of SF-36 (quality of life) between inclusion and at Month 30 | - From Day 1 to Month 30. | |
Secondary | - To compare healthcare resource utilization at Month 30 after randomization (Day 1) in both arms | - Healthcare resource utilization between inclusion and Month 30 being defined as the percentage of patients being hospitalized at least once except only for rituximab infusions | From Day 1 to Month 30. |