Glabellar Frown Lines Clinical Trial
Official title:
Depth of Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection for Treatment of Glabellar Lines
Verified date | April 2024 |
Source | Henry Ford Health System |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
STUDY QUESTION: Does the depth of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in the glabellar complex affect efficacy of the BoTN for the improvement of glabellar frown lines? STUDY AIM - Primary objective: Compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines - Secondary objective: Determine any adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT: Although the use of BoTN for treatment of glabellar lines has long been established as safe and effective, the optimal depth of injection has not been established. Our project hopes to establish the optimal depth of injection for onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin for maximal improvement of glabellar lines with minimal adverse effects
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | December 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | June 20, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient age 18 and older 2. Patient able to understand requirements of the study and risks involved 3. Patient able to sign a consent form Exclusion Criteria: 1. A patient who is lactating, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant 2. Prior history of botulinum neurotoxin treatment of the face within the past one (1) year 3. History of hypersensitivity to botulinum neurotoxin 4. History of neuromuscular disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis) 5. History of facial surgery or scars in the treatment area that may confound study results |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Henry Ford Health System | Detroit | Michigan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Henry Ford Health System |
United States,
Cho Y, Lee HJ, Lee KW, Lee KL, Kang JS, Kim HJ. Ultrasonographic and Three-Dimensional Analyses at the Glabella and Radix of the Nose for Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection Procedures into the Procerus Muscle. Toxins (Basel). 2019 Sep 24;11(10):560. doi: 10.3390/toxins11100560. — View Citation
Giordano CN, Matarasso SL, Ozog DM. Injectable and topical neurotoxins in dermatology: Basic science, anatomy, and therapeutic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jun;76(6):1013-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.022. — View Citation
Giordano CN, Matarasso SL, Ozog DM. Injectable and topical neurotoxins in dermatology: Indications, adverse events, and controversies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jun;76(6):1027-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.012. — View Citation
Gostimir M, Liou V, Yoon MK. Safety of Botulinum Toxin A Injections for Facial Rejuvenation: A Meta-Analysis of 9,669 Patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jan-Feb 01;39(1):13-25. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002169. Epub 2022 Mar 30. — View Citation
Lee HJ, Lee KW, Tansatit T, Kim HJ. Three-Dimensional Territory and Depth of the Corrugator Supercilii: Application to Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection. Clin Anat. 2020 Jul;33(5):795-803. doi: 10.1002/ca.23507. Epub 2019 Nov 13. — View Citation
Mahmoud BH, Burnett C, Ozog D. Prospective randomized controlled study to determine the effect of topical application of botulinum toxin A for crow's feet after treatment with ablative fractional CO2 laser. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S75-81. doi: 10.1097/01.DSS.0000452642.83894.ab. — View Citation
Sneath J, Humphrey S, Carruthers A, Carruthers J. Injecting botulinum toxin at different depths is not effective for the correction of eyebrow asymmetry. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S82-7. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000159. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Injection of onabotulinumtoxinA, 2 mm depth | Assess the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm for the improvement of glabellar lines using the Merz aesthetics scales.
The Merz scale is as follows: 0 - no glabellar lines 1- mild glabellar lines 2 - moderate glabellar lines 3 - severe glabellar lines 4 - very severe glabellar lines |
120 days | |
Primary | Injection of onabotulinumtoxinA, 4 mm depth | Assess the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines using the Merz aesthetics scales.
The Merz scale is as follows: 0 - no glabellar lines 1- mild glabellar lines 2 - moderate glabellar lines 3 - severe glabellar lines 4 - very severe glabellar lines |
120 days | |
Secondary | Secondary Outcome Measure | Incidence of any adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm. | 120 days | |
Secondary | Efficacy comparison | Compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines using the Merz aesthetics scale.
The Merz scale is as follows: 0 - no glabellar lines 1- mild glabellar lines 2 - moderate glabellar lines 3 - severe glabellar lines 4 - very severe glabellar lines |
120 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02236312 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05565950 -
AI-09 In Subjects With Glabellar Lines, GL-101
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00430963 -
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05083286 -
Duration of Botox Using OLD Versus COLD for Treatment of Glabellar Lines
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03687736 -
Subject Satisfaction With AbobutulinumtoxinA Treatment
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04281745 -
Long-term Open-label Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines With CORETOX®
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05623410 -
Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of ATGC-110 (Botulinum Toxin) With Xeomin® for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Frown Lines
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03440671 -
The Safety and Efficacy Study of Hutox Versus Botox® in Subject With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03736928 -
Safety and Efficacy of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01808742 -
Study Evaluating the Treatment of Forehead and/or Glabellar Lines With the CRYO-TOUCH III Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00777803 -
NT 201 (Xeomin®/Bocouture®) in Comparison With Clostridium Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00430586 -
Finding of Optimal Dose for NT 201 in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04281095 -
A Comparative Study of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Frown Lines
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05146999 -
Assess Aesthetic Improvement and Onset of QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02428608 -
Safety Study of DWP-450 (Botulinum Toxin, Type a) to Treat Glabellar Lines - EV-006
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04143815 -
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MBA-P01 in Treatment of Glabellar Lines
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05305768 -
Xeomin Treatment of Glabellar Lines Using OLD Versus COLD
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05364580 -
The Efficacy and Safety Study of Protoxin Versus Botox® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05320393 -
Study to Demonstrate Safety and Duration of Effect of 40 Units of PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs to Treat Glabellar Lines
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02677805 -
Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Efficacy and Safety Study II
|
Phase 3 |