Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Clinical Trial
— ENESTOfficial title:
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nilotinib Versus Best Supportive Care With or Without a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Investigator's Choice) in Adult Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Resistant to Both Imatinib and Sunitinib
The study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nilotinib versus current treatment in adults with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who have either progressed or who were intolerant to the first and second line treatments.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 248 |
Est. completion date | June 2011 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion criteria (Core Phase): - Age =18 years - Radiological confirmation of disease progression during imatinib and sunitinib therapy OR intolerance to imatinib and/or sunitinib - At least one measurable site of disease on CT/MRI scan - Physically fit even if not able to work - Normal organ, electrolyte, and bone marrow function Inclusion criteria (Extension Phase): - Patients whose tumors had progressed on the control arm and had crossed over to the nilotinib arm. - The study was stopped due to meeting the primary efficacy endpoint of PFS at the interim analysis. - Patients who were still being treated at the close of the Core study on the control arm or nilotinib arm (whose tumors have not progressed at the time of the end of the Core study). - Patients must have had documented, confirmed stable, partial or complete response as defined by the RECIST criteria at the time of entry into the Extension study with the exception of patients who had progressed on the control arm. Exclusion criteria (Core Phase): - Previous treatment with nilotinib or any other drug in this class or other targeted therapy - Treatment with any cytotoxic and/or investigational cytotoxic drug = 4 weeks prior to study entry - Impaired cardiac function - Use of coumarin derivatives (i.e. warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon) - Women who are pregnant or lactating Exclusion criteria (Extension Phase): - Use of other anticancer treatments or investigational drugs (with exception of the study drugs) - Patients with a history of noncompliance with study drug treatment in the Core study protocol. Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria applied |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Novartis Investigative Site | Auchenflower | Queensland |
Australia | Novartis Investigative Site | East Melbourne | Victoria |
Austria | Novartis Investigative Site | Vienna | |
Canada | Novartis Investigative Site | Toronto | |
Czech Republic | Novartis Investigative Site | Praha 5 | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Bordeaux | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Lyon | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Marseille | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Duesseldorf | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Essen | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Frankfurt | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Hannover | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Koln | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Mannheim | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Muenchen | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Tubingen | |
Italy | Novrtis Investigative Site | Bologna | |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Milan | |
Korea, Republic of | Novartis Investigative Site | Seoul | |
Netherlands | Novartis Investigative Site | Leiden | |
Poland | Novartis Investigative Site | Warszawa | |
Spain | Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | |
Switzerland | Novartis Investigative Site | Chur | |
United States | Dana Farber Cancer Institute | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | University of Chicago Hospital | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Wayne State University/Wertz Clinical Cancer Center | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | University of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas |
United States | UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center | Los Angeles | California |
United States | St. Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center | New York | New York |
United States | Fox Chase Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Washington University School of Medicine - Siteman Cancer Center | St. Louis | Missouri |
United States | H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Washington Hospital Center - Washington Cancer Institute | Washington | District of Columbia |
United States | Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
United States, Australia, Austria, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008) | Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a participant has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the time of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression is defined according to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST) criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions. | Up to 16 months | No |
Primary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set | PFS is defined as the time from the first date of cross-over to nilotinib therapy from the control arm to the date of the first observation of documented disease progression. Tumor assessment was based on the local investigator's measurement using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST) criteria. Progression is defined according to modified RECIST criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions. | Up to 34 months | No |
Secondary | Overall Survival Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off:June, 2008) | Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a participant is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact. | Up to 16 months | No |
Secondary | Overall Survival During Core and Extension Phases of the Study | Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a participant is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact. This analysis included both Core and Extension data as well as survival follow up data. | Up to 50 months (including core, extension and follow up period) | No |
Secondary | Overall Survival for Treatment Crossover Analysis Set | For patients who crossed-over to nilotinib from the control arm, the overall survival was the time from the first dose date of nilotinib after switching from control arm to the date of death due to any cause. If death was not observed, the OS was censored at the latest date the patient was known to be alive. | Up to 34 months | No |
Secondary | Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Central Radiology Review During Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008) | The best overall response is the best response recorded from randomization until disease progression. The CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Using modified RECIST criteria, a Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all lesions, and a Partial Response is defined as either 1) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no new lesions or progression of non-target lesions or 2) disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s). | Up to 16 months | No |
Secondary | Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set | The best overall response (CR/PR) must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Using modified RECIST criteria, a Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all lesions, and a Partial Response is defined as either 1) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no new lesions or progression of non-target lesions or 2) disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s). | Up to 34 months | No |
Secondary | Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008) | The overall clinical benefit includes the best overall responses of CR, PR, or SD. The best overall responses of CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. The best overall response of SD must have at least one SD (or better) at least 6 weeks (or 6 months or 12 months as applicable) after randomization but before progression. | Up to 16 months | No |
Secondary | Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set | The overall clinical benefit includes the best overall responses of CR, PR, or SD. The best overall responses of CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. The best overall response of SD must have at least one SD (or better) at least 6 weeks (or 6 months or 12 months as applicable) after randomization but before progression. | Up to 34 months | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05385549 -
5 Years of Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With a High Risk
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05905887 -
Rivoceranib Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01933958 -
Regorafenib Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04584008 -
Targeted Agent Evaluation in Digestive Cancers in China Based on Molecular Characteristics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01440959 -
Dovitinib for Imatinib/Sumitinib-failed Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): TKI258
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00718562 -
Efficacy and Safety of AMN107 in Patients With GastroIntestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Who Have Failed Both Imatinib and Sunitinib
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00385203 -
The Biological Activity of Cediranib (AZD2171) in Gastro-Intestinal Stromal Tumours(GIST).
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00137449 -
Study Of SU011248 Administered On A Continuous Daily Dosing Schedule In Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00237172 -
Phase II Clinical Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (Extension Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04409223 -
Efficacy and Safety of Famitinib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour Patients After Failure of Imatinib
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03556384 -
Temozolomide (TMZ) In Advanced Succinate Dehydrogenase (SDH)-Mutant/Deficient Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04106024 -
Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Failure of Imatinib: a Prospective, Single Arm and Multicenter Trial
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02171286 -
The Oncopanel Pilot (TOP) Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01114087 -
Impact of the Inhibitors of Tyrosine Kinase on the Male Fertility
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05366816 -
ctDNA-Guided Sunitinib And Regorafenib Therapy for GIST
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03602092 -
Observational Registry Data on GIST Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05197933 -
Safety of Laparoscopic Resection for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor on Unfavorable Anatomic Site of Stomach
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02931929 -
MITIGATE-NeoBOM: A Study to Evaluate 68Ga- NeoBOMB1 in Patients With Advanced TKI-treated GIST Using PET/CT
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05080621 -
Ripretinib in Combination With Binimetinib in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02607332 -
Paclitaxel in Patients With Metastatic or Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) After Failure to Imatinib and Sunitinib
|
Phase 2 |