Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02884154
Other study ID # K_EUS_Study_1
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received August 21, 2016
Last updated January 21, 2018
Start date August 2016
Est. completion date July 2017

Study information

Verified date January 2018
Source Pusan National University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The exact incidence of subepithelial tumors (SETs) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is unknown, but the prevalence of gastric SETs detected during routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy is 0.36%. GI SETs may include leiomyoma, GI stromal tumor (GIST), schwannoma, lipoma, cyst, or ectopic pancreas. Surgical resection is the principal diagnostic and therapeutic method for SETs, especially for large and symptomatic ones. Preoperative pathological diagnosis of SETs may facilitate clinical decision making, but conventional endoscopic forceps biopsy does not yield adequate amounts of subepithelial tissue for definitive diagnosis.

Although endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the best imaging modality for the evaluation of SETs, it cannot substitute histopathological diagnosis. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may provide adequate amounts of tissue for the diagnosis of SETs, but it does not always afford adequate samples for immunohistochemical analysis because of the often small number of cells obtained by aspiration. Since some SETs, especially GI mesenchymal tumors such as GIST or schwannoma, have varied morphologic appearances, and diagnosis using a small biopsy is not straightforward, immunohistochemical analysis is strongly advisable, if not essential. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy (EUS-TNB) may overcome the limitations of EUS-FNA in procuring sufficient core tissue specimens. Although EUS-TNB is more accurate than EUS-FNA for diagnosing GI mesenchymal tumors, the rigidity of its 19-gauge (G) caliber and the mechanical friction of the firing mechanism produced by the torqued echoendoscope limit its use for SETs located in the gastric antrum and duodenum. Therefore, a needle facilitating adequate histological core sampling with easy maneuverability needs to be established. A 19G EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) device with ProCore reverse-bevel technology was recently introduced. A multicenter study revealed that histological samples could be successfully obtained using this needle in most patients having GI SETs, with a diagnostic accuracy of >80%.10 However, because of technical difficulties with this needle in the gastric antrum and duodenum, the same FNB device was recently developed in a 20 G platform with coiled sheath. This prospective, multicenter study aimed to evaluate feasibility, yield, and diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed 20 G ProCore needle with coiled sheath in patients with GI SETs.


Description:

Patients and Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed GI SETs will be prospectively enrolled at 8 university hospitals in Korea between May and December 2016, if they met the following criteria: having a hypoechoic mass in the submucosal and/or proper muscle layers on the basis of EUS and tumor >2 cm in size. Exclusion criteria are: SETs were not located in the submucosal and/or proper muscle layers on EUS; EUS revealed the characteristic findings of lipoma, cyst, vessel or extraluminal lesions; the platelet count was <50,000/mm3 and prothrombin time was <50%; or the patient did not provide consent to undergo the study. This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of each hospital and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All enrolled patients provide written informed consents to participate in the study.

Technique for EUS-FNB

All procedures are performed by using a linear array echoendoscope (Olympus UCT-140, UCT-240; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan or PentaxEG-3870UTK; Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) with the patients placed in the left lateral decubitus position under conscious sedation.

Before the study commenced, all participating endosonographers discuss the procedural steps in detail. Technical details of the standard tissue-acquisition protocol are as follows. After the target lesion is endosonographically visualized and the region scanned for SETs using color or pulsed Doppler, FNB is performed at the esophagus, stomach, duodenum or rectum, depending on the lesion location. The needle is advanced into the target tissue under endosonographic guidance.

After penetrating the lesion, the endosonographer moves the needle to-and-fro for more than 10 to 15 times within the lesion while an assistant simultaneously pulled out the stylet slowly and continuously over 20 s to achieve minimal negative pressure within the needle (slow-pull technique). Finally, the needle is withdrawn from the lesion. At least three needle passes are performed using the designated needle, and if a diagnostic or technical failure is encountered, the patient is switched to the alternative needle according to the judgment of the endosonographers.

Preparation for histological analysis

Because pathologists are absent during endoscopy, FNB samples are recovered and stored for subsequent processing by the endosonographers. The specimens are then expressed onto slides by using a stylet or by flushing with air into the needle assembly, to harvest the core samples from the needle. The endosonographers then carefully inspect the material on the slides for the presence of tissue cores defined as whitish pieces of tissue with apparent bulk, which are measured and then lifted off the slides and placed into a formalin bottle. The core samples are macroscopically assessed as a definite tissue core; suspicious tissue core mixed with blood clots; or only blood or scarce sample without any tissue core. The former two sample types are considered macroscopically optimal core samples.

If tissue cores are obtained, they are fixed in formalin and stained in hematoxylin and eosin for evaluation by pathologists. Samples with tissue cores are graded as optimal or suboptimal: optimal, if the material allows satisfactory assessment of histologic architecture and immunohistochemical evaluation, such as c-kit, CD34, S-100, or smooth muscle actin, if indicated, and suboptimal, if the histological core is inadequate for the abovementioned assessments. Because the morphological characteristics of mesenchymal tumors are nonspecific, a positive diagnosis by EUS-FNB is only considered true positive when immunohistochemical analysis is conclusive. Conventional cytological analysis is additionally performed in most cases or if a core sample is unavailable. Cytological material is sent to the cytologists as a fixed or an air-dried slide. The gold standard is the histopathological assessment of the resected specimens for patients who underwent endoscopic resection or surgery, and the assessment of the FNB samples for those who did not.

Outcome parameters

The primary outcome parameter is diagnostic sufficiency. Diagnostic sufficiency is defined as the proportion of patients in whom the histopathological diagnosis could be established within three needle passes. The percentage of cases in which the pathologist classified the quality of the sample as optimal for histological evaluation is also evaluated. The secondary outcome measures are rates of diagnostic failure, technical failure, and complications. Diagnostic failure is defined as failure to obtain sufficient core samples even after three passes, and technical failure is defined as malfunction of the needle before three needle passes. Complications are defined as any deviation from the clinical course after EUS-guided sampling, as observed by the endosonographers or recovery suite nurses, or as reported by patients. Excessive bleeding at the site of puncture, perforation, hypotension, and need for reversal medication are documented.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 39
Est. completion date July 2017
Est. primary completion date February 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Having a hypoechoic mass in the submucosal and/or proper muscle layers on the basis of EUS and tumor >2 cm in size

Exclusion Criteria:

- SETs were not located in the submucosal and/or proper muscle layers on EUS

- EUS revealed the characteristic findings of lipoma, cyst, vessel or extraluminal lesions; the platelet count was <50,000/mm3 and prothrombin time was <50%

- The patient did not provide consent to undergo the study

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Echotip ProCore? HD Ultrasound Biopsy Needle


Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Pusan National University Hospital

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary diagnostic sufficiency Diagnostic sufficiency is defined as the proportion of patients in whom the histopathological diagnosis could be established within three needle passes. up to 2 weeks
Secondary diagnostic failure rate up to 2 weeks
Secondary technical failure rate up to 1 day
Secondary complications up to 4 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04933669 - Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study of Neoadjuvant Imatinib Mesylate for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Phase 2
Completed NCT01769248 - Prospective Trial of EUS-FNA Versus EUS-FNB Using a Novel Core Biopsy Needle N/A
Completed NCT01774162 - EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With a New Core Histology Needle Versus Conventional Fine Needle Aspiration N/A
Completed NCT01110668 - Evaluation of Nilotinib In Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Phase 2
Terminated NCT00091078 - Oblimersen and Imatinib Mesylate in Treating Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery Phase 2
Completed NCT00025246 - Imatinib Mesylate in Treating Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor That Has Been Completely Removed During Surgery Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT00265798 - Sorafenib in Treating Patients With Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor That Progressed During or After Previous Treatment With Imatinib Mesylate and Sunitinib Malate Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04143048 - A Study on Non-invasive Early Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Nodules
Recruiting NCT02931981 - Serum Dickkopf-4 as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02576080 - Efficacy of Imatinib in Patients With Intermediate-risk Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With a High-risk Genomic Grade Index Phase 3
Recruiting NCT01389583 - A Study of AUY922 for GIST(Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor) Patients Phase 2
Recruiting NCT00777504 - Study to the Optimal Duration of Therapy With Oral Angiogenesis Inhibitors Phase 4
Completed NCT00764595 - Imatinib Mesylate in Treating Patients With Liver Metastasis From a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Phase 2
Completed NCT00769782 - Surgery in Treating Patients With Liver Metastasis From a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Phase 2
Completed NCT00098579 - Doxorubicin Hydrochloride and Alvocidib in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Sarcoma That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery Phase 1
Completed NCT00005862 - SU5416 in Treating Patients With Advanced, Metastatic, or Recurrent Soft Tissue Sarcomas Phase 2
Completed NCT00004895 - Octreotide as Palliative Therapy for Cancer-Related Bowel Obstruction That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02776878 - A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Dasatinib in Refractory Metastatic GIST N/A
Completed NCT01751919 - A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib Mesylate Tablet 400mg (1 Tablet) and Glivec Film-coated Tablet 100mg (4 Tablets)(Phase I) Phase 1
Completed NCT01267695 - Perioperative Imatinib Mesylate in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Phase 2