Role of Mucosal Impedance Measurement for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Trial

Official title:

Role of Mucosal Impedance Measurement for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06339801
• Other study ID #: HCJSM-24-193
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Start date: June 1, 2024
• Est. completion date: August 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: March 2024
• Source: Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín
• Contact: MARIA M PISKORZ, MD
• Phone: 5491133192885
• Email: neurogastrohc[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux. However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.

Objectives

The Main objectives of this study are to:

1. Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.

2. Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.

Secondary objectives:

1. Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement

2. Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.

Description:

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) occurs when gastroduodenal content refluxes, causing bothersome symptoms and/or complications. 1 It is estimated that GERD affects 20-30% of the population in Western countries 2 (23% in Argentina), and it is associated with an impairment in the quality of life and significant healthcare costs. 3-5 Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 The last Lyon Consensus considered GERD when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D) or acid exposure time (AET) is >6% on ambulatory studies. Acid exposure time <4% definitively rules out pathologic gastroesophageal acid reflux, while AET between 4-6% is considered borderline. 9,10 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux.12 However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.

Objectives

The Main objectives of this study are to:

1. Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.

2. Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.

Secondary objectives:

1. Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement

2. Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study METHODS Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes. Study Setting Inclusion Criteria Patients >18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.

Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included Exclusion Criteria

• Pregnancy or lactation

• Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)

• Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)

• Lack of informed consent

• Severe psychiatric disorders Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.

Intervention All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). The MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System utilizes a device (MiVu™ Endo Cap) that attaches to the distal end of the endoscope, along with proprietary software to instantly detect changes in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy. Patients are required to fast for 8 hours before the procedure. During an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under anesthesia sedation, measurements are taken from direct contact of the sensors with the esophageal mucosa. Any luminal air or liquid between the sensors and mucosal tissue will be pressed away from the tissue being measured. After identifying the gastroesophageal junction, measurements will be initiated 2cm above it. The endoscopist will wait until all 3 sensors make stable contact with the mucosa, indicated by high-quality signals marked in green color by the software. The Study Metrics require data spanning 10 consecutive centimeters. Each measurement capture will span 3 cm, and a minimum of 4 measurements spanning 10 cm are required. Once measurements have been captured at 4 depths, the metrics will populate. MI measurements will be expressed in Ohms and analyzed using the ZVU software version 3.3 or greater (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). Once 10 centimeters worth of consecutive data have been acquired, the probabilities of disease will be displayed and patients will be categorized as: 1) NERD and 2) Non-NERD based on the measurement result. The results will be expressed in Ohms, and the interpretation will be based on the results from table 2 in the previous MI validation publication.14 Subsequently, a 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring without proton pump inhibitors (PPI), preceded by high-resolution esophageal manometry to identify the lower esophageal sphincter height, will be performed. Both assessments will be conducted by different operators in a blind and independent manner.

Patients will be divided into two groups: A) NERD: when the percentage of time of acid exposure is greater than 6%, B) Non-NERD: when the percentage of acid exposure is less than 4%. The Demeester score will be reported for both groups.

Treatment response evaluation

Based on the previously described categorization, the following treatment will be initiated:

1. Dexlansoprazole 30mg per day in the GERD group

2. Amitriptyline 10mg per day in the non-GERD group At 8 weeks post-treatment, a GerdQ assessment will be conducted. Sample Size Considering an estimated sensitivity of mucosal impedance measurement for the diagnosis of GERD of 70%, a sample size of 100 patients was calculated. Factoring in a 20% patient loss, a total of 120 patients will be screened.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 100
• Est. completion date: August 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: June 1, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients >18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.

Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included

Exclusion Criteria:

• ? Pregnancy or lactation

• Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)

• Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)

• Lack of informed consent

• Severe psychiatric disorders

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Esophagitis, Peptic
• Gastroesophageal Reflux

Intervention

Device:
• MiVu
All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín

References & Publications (2)

Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut. 2024 Jan 5;73(2):361-371. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616. — View Citation

Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Cui H, Fass R. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)--acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Feb 15;17(4):537-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01423.x. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	diagnostic performance	diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement	immediately after the intervention/procedure
Primary	mucosal impedance pattern	mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.	immediately after the intervention/procedure
Secondary	Correlations	correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement	immediately after the intervention/procedure
Secondary	Probability score	the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD	immediately after the intervention/procedure