Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02370498
Other study ID # 3475-061
Secondary ID 152988MK-3475-06
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date May 11, 2015
Est. completion date June 10, 2021

Study information

Verified date May 2022
Source Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a study for participants with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have had tumor progression after first-line treatment with platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet therapy. The primary study hypotheses are that pembrolizumab (MK-3475) prolongs progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for participants with tumors that show positive programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. As of 20-March-2016, enrollment will be limited to PD-L1 positive participants.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 592
Est. completion date June 10, 2021
Est. primary completion date October 26, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed diagnosis of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma - Confirmed metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable disease (by computed tomography [CT] scan or clinical evidence) - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 - Progression on or after prior first-line therapy containing any platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublet - Willing to provide tumor tissue for PD-L1 biomarker analysis (new or archived specimens with agreement of Sponsor). As of 20 March 2016, participants must be PD-L1 positive to be enrolled. - Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2/neu) status known and participants with HER2/neu positive tumors show documentation of disease progression on treatment containing trastuzumab - Female participants of childbearing potential should be willing to use 2 methods of birth control or be surgically sterile, or abstain from heterosexual activity for the course of the study through 120 days after the last dose of pembrolizumab or through 180 days after the last dose of paclitaxel. - Male participants should agree to use an adequate method of contraception starting with the first dose of study therapy through 120 days after the last dose of pembrolizumab or through 180 days after the last dose of paclitaxel. - Adequate organ function Exclusion Criteria: - Currently participating and receiving study therapy, or participated in a study of an investigational agent and received study therapy or used an investigation device within 4 weeks of the first dose of medication - Squamous cell or undifferentiated gastric cancer - Active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in past 2 years (replacement therapy is not considered a form of systemic treatment - Diagnosis of immunodeficiency or receiving systemic steroid therapy or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of study medication - Prior anti-cancer monoclonal antibody (mAb) within 4 weeks prior to study Day 1 or not recovered from AEs due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier - Prior chemotherapy, targeted small molecule therapy, or radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to study Day 1 or not recovered from adverse events due to a previously administered agent or surgery - Known additional malignancy that is progressing or requires active treatment (with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ cervical cancer that has undergone potentially curative therapy) - Known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis - History of (noninfectious) pneumonitis that required steroids or current pneumonitis - Active infection requiring systemic therapy - Known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the trial - Pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the screening visit through 120 days after the last dose of pembrolizumab or through 180 days after the last dose of paclitaxel. - Prior immunotherapy including anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-PD-L2 agent, or previously participated in Merck pembrolizumab (MK-3475) clinical trial - Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) - Known active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C - Live vaccine within 30 days of planned start of study therapy - Known allergy or hypersensitivity to paclitaxel or any components used in the paclitaxel preparation or other contraindication for taxane therapy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Biological:
pembrolizumab
200 mg administered as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Drug:
paclitaxel
80 mg/m^2 administered as IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Participants PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. According to RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) was defined as a 20% relative increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) in months was reported for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Primary Overall Survival (OS) in PD-L1 Positive Participants OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median OS (95% CI) in months was reported for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary PFS According to RECIST 1.1 Based on BICR in All Participants PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. According to RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as a 20% relative increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (95% CI) in months was reported for all participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary OS in All Participants OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median OS (95% CI) in months was reported for all participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary PFS According to RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 Positive Participants PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on investigator assessment, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. According to RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as a 20% relative increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (95% CI) in months was reported for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary PFS According to RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator Assessment in All Participants PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on investigator assessment, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. According to RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as a 20% relative increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (95% CI) in months was reported for all participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary PFS According to Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) Based on BICR in PD-L1 Positive Participants PFS defined as time from randomization to first documented PD per irRECIST based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Following initial PD by RECIST 1.1 (20% relative increase in SOD of target lesions), participants were assessed according to irRECIST: tumor assessment was repeated =4 weeks later to confirm PD with the option of continuing treatment until this scan was obtained for clinically stable participants. If PD confirmed, participant was discontinued from treatment unless investigator determined benefit. If repeat scan indicated stable disease (SD; neither sufficient shrinkage or increase of target lesion), partial response (PR; =30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions), or complete response (CR; disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions), participant could continue treatment at investigator's discretion. PFS analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (95% CI) in months was reported for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary PFS According to irRECIST Based on BICR in All Participants PFS defined as time from randomization to first documented PD per irRECIST based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Following initial PD by RECIST 1.1 (20% relative increase in SOD of target lesions), participants were assessed according to irRECIST: tumor assessment was repeated =4 weeks later to confirm PD with the option of continuing treatment until this scan was obtained for clinically stable participants. If PD confirmed, participant was discontinued from treatment unless investigator determined benefit. If repeat scan indicated SD (neither sufficient shrinkage or increase of target lesion), PR (=30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions), or CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions), participant could continue treatment at investigator's discretion. PFS analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (95% CI) in months was reported for all participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) According to RECIST 1.1 Based on BICR in PD-L1 Positive Participants TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as a 20% relative increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. If there was no documented disease progression, TTP was censored at last tumor assessment date. TTP was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median TTP (95% CI) in months was reported for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary TTP According to RECIST 1.1 Based on BICR in All Participants TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as a 20% relative increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. If there was no documented disease progression, TTP was censored at last tumor assessment date. TTP was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median TTP (95% CI) in months was reported for all participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary TTP According to RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 Positive Participants TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on investigator assessment. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as a 20% relative increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. If there was no documented disease progression, TTP was censored at last tumor assessment date. TTP was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median TTP (95% CI) in months was reported for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary TTP According to RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator Assessment in All Participants TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on investigator assessment. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as a 20% relative increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of >5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. If there was no documented disease progression, TTP was censored at last tumor assessment date. TTP was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median TTP (95% CI) in months was reported for all participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to RECIST 1.1 Based on BICR in PD-L1 Positive Participants ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a confirmed CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on BICR. ORR was analyzed using the stratified Miettinen and Nurminen method, and reported with 95% CI for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary ORR According to RECIST 1.1 Based on BICR in All Participants ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a confirmed CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on BICR. ORR was analyzed using the stratified Miettinen and Nurminen method, and reported with 95% CI for all participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary ORR According to RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 Positive Participants ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a confirmed CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on investigator assessment. ORR was analyzed using the stratified Miettinen and Nurminen method, and reported with 95% CI for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary ORR According to RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator Assessment in All Participants ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a confirmed CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on investigator assessment. ORR was analyzed using the stratified Miettinen and Nurminen method, and reported with 95% CI for all participants by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST 1.1 Based on BICR in PD-L1 Positive Participants For PD-L1 positive participants who demonstrated CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on BICR, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median DOR (range) in months was reported for PD-L1 positive participants with response by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary DOR According to RECIST 1.1 Based on BICR in All Participants For participants who demonstrated CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on BICR, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median DOR (range) in months was reported for all participants with response by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary DOR According to RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 Positive Participants For PD-L1 positive participants who demonstrated CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on investigator assessment, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median DOR (range) in months was reported for PD-L1 positive participants with response by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary DOR According to RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator Assessment in All Participants For participants who demonstrated CR (disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes must have become normal) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to RECIST 1.1 and based on investigator assessment, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median DOR (range) in months was reported for all participants with response by treatment group. Up to 30 months (through database cut-off date of 26 Oct 2017)
Secondary Percentage of PD-L1 Positive Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. The percentage of participants with at least one AE was reported for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to 71 months (through database cut-off date of 10 Jun 2021)
Secondary Percentage of All Participants Who Experienced an AE An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. The percentage of participants with at least one AE was reported for all participants by treatment group. Up to 71 months (through database cut-off date of 10 Jun 2021)
Secondary Percentage of PD-L1 Positive Participants That Discontinued Study Treatment Due to AE An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. The percentage of participants that discontinued study treatment due to an AE was reported for PD-L1 positive participants by treatment group. Up to approximately 26.4 months
Secondary Percentage of All Participants That Discontinued Study Treatment Due to AE An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. The percentage of participants that discontinued study treatment due to an AE was reported for all participants by treatment group. Up to approximately 26.4 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05977998 - A Phase II Study of Perioperative Paclitaxel in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Carcinomatosis or Positive Cytology Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05059444 - ORACLE: Observation of ResiduAl Cancer With Liquid Biopsy Evaluation
Not yet recruiting NCT04931420 - Study Comparing Standard of Care Chemotherapy With/ Without Sequential Cytoreductive Surgery for Patients With Metastatic Foregut Cancer and Undetectable Circulating Tumor-Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid Levels Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03257163 - Pembrolizumab, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Mismatch-Repair Deficient and Epstein-Barr Virus Positive Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT02128243 - Trial of S-1 Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT01178944 - Pralatrexate and Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Esophageal, Stomach, or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Phase 2
Terminated NCT00209079 - Phase II Trial of Gleevec and Taxotere as a Combined Regimen for Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma Phase 2
Terminated NCT02862535 - Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Andecaliximab as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-Cancer Agents in Japanese Participants With Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05008783 - A Study of AK104 in the First-line Treatment of Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic G/GEJ Adenocarcinoma Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04430738 - Tucatinib Plus Trastuzumab and Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy or Pembrolizumab-containing Combinations for HER2+ Gastrointestinal Cancers Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04114136 - Anti-PD-1 mAb Plus Metabolic Modulator in Solid Tumor Malignancies Phase 2
Completed NCT03196232 - Epacadostat and Pembrolizumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Gastroesophageal Junction or Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04047953 - Paclitaxel (Albumin-bound) Combined With Oxaliplatin and S-1 Conversion Therapy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma N/A
Completed NCT02864381 - Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Andecaliximab Combined With Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Adults With Unresectable or Recurrent Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Phase 2
Completed NCT02891447 - Heated Mitomycin and Cisplatin During Surgery in Treating Patients With Stomach or Gastroesophageal Cancer Phase 2
Terminated NCT04032704 - A Study of Ladiratuzumab Vedotin in Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2
Terminated NCT04604132 - Derazantinib Alone or in Combination With Paclitaxel, Ramucirumab or Atezolizumab in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02830594 - Pembrolizumab and Palliative Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Esophagus, Stomach, or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06038578 - A Study of TRK-950 When Used in Combination With Ramucirumab and Paclitaxel in Patients With Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Terminated NCT04099277 - A Study of LY3435151 in Participants With Solid Tumors Phase 1