Fungal Keratitis Clinical Trial
— MUTT_TEOfficial title:
Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Therapeutic Exploratory Study
Verified date | July 2018 |
Source | University of California, San Francisco |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
We evaluated whether voriconazole is a superior treatment to natamycin for filamentous fungal keratitis in a randomized, masked, controlled trial. This is a therapeutic exploratory study to investigate the safety and feasibility of conducting a larger study and to generate preliminary data.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 120 |
Est. completion date | August 2008 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 16 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Presence of a corneal ulcer at presentation - Evidence of filamentous fungus on KOH (or Giemsa or any other stain) or culture - The patient must be able to verbalize a basic understanding of the study after it is explained to the patient, as determined by physician examiner. This understanding must include a commitment to return for follow-up visits. - Willingness to be treated as an in-patient or to be treated as an out-patient and come back every 48-72 hours to receive fresh medication for 3 weeks - Appropriate consent Exclusion Criteria: - Overlying epithelial defect < 0.5 mm at its greatest width at presentation - Impending perforation - Evidence of bacteria on Gram stain at the time of enrollment - Evidence of acanthamoeba by stain - Evidence of herpetic keratitis by history or exam - Corneal scar not easily distinguishable from current ulcer - Age less than 16 years (before 16th birthday) - Bilateral ulcers - Previous penetrating keratoplasty in the affected eye - Pregnancy (by history or urine test) or breast-feeding (by history) - Acuity worse than 6/60 (20/200) in the fellow eye (note that any acuity, uncorrected, corrected, pinhole, or BSCVA 6/60 or better qualifies for enrollment) - Known allergy to study medications (antifungal or preservative) - No light perception in the affected eye - Not willing to participate |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
India | Aravind Eye Hospital | Madurai | Tamil Nadu |
India | Aravind Eye Hospital | Pondicherry | Tamil Nadu |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of California, San Francisco | Aravind Eye Hospitals, India, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, That Man May See, Inc. |
India,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) 3 Months After Enrollment, Adjusting for Enrollment BSCVA in a Multiple Linear Regression Model | The primary efficacy endpoint was BSCVA at 3 months in the study eye, using a linear regression model with 3-month BSCVA measured in logMAR (logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) as the outcome variable and treatment arm (voriconazole vs natamycin) and enrollment logMAR BSCVA and corneal de-epithelialization (yes or no) as covariates. | 3 months from enrollment | |
Secondary | Time to Resolution of Epithelial Defect | Resolution of epithelial defect was defined as the absence of an epithelial defect with administration of fluorescein. The time to re-epithelialization was compared between the voriconazole and natamycin groups using the Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for baseline epithelial defect size. | 3 months from enrollment | |
Secondary | Size of Infiltrate/Scar Post-treatment Was Analyzed in a Linear Regression Model Using Enrollment Infiltrate/Scar Size as a Covariate. | Size of infiltrate/scar post-treatment was analyzed in a linear regression model using enrollment infiltrate/scar size as a covariate. No differentiation was made between infiltrate and scar when measuring infiltrate/scar size (measured in mm). For analysis, infiltrate/scar size was characterized by the geometric mean of the longest dimension and the longest perpendicular. | 3 months from enrollment | |
Secondary | Subgroup Analysis - Best Spectacle-corrected Visual Acuity Examined by Voriconazole and Natamycin Treatment Arms in Subgroups of Fungal Ulcers (Fusarium Spp and Aspergillus Spp). | Two subgroup analyses were conducted by causative organism: 1) best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) by treatment arm among Fusarium ulcers; 2) best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) by treatment arm among Aspergillus ulcers. | 3 months from enrollment | |
Secondary | Best Hard Contact Lens-corrected Visual Acuity 3 Months After Enrollment in a Multiple Linear Regression Model With Enrollment Hard Contact Lens-corrected Visual Acuity as a Covariate | Best hard contact lens-corrected visual acuity 3 months after enrollment was evaluated in a multiple linear regression model with enrollment hard contact lens-corrected visual acuity as a covariate. Visual acuity is reported in logMAR (logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution). | 3 months from enrollment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02731638 -
Mycotic Antimicrobial Localized Injection for Treatment of Corneal Ulcers
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02088970 -
Safety and Efficacity of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Infectious Keratitis (Bacterial and Fungal ): Randomized,Controlled, Prospective Study. (CXL)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01831206 -
Collagen Cross-linking in Infectious Keratitis Trial
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00516399 -
A Clinical Trial of the Treatment of Fungal Corneal Ulcers With Povidone-Iodine
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05655689 -
The Antibiogram and Outcomes of Antimicrobial Regimens in Microbial Keratitis: A Prospective Cohort Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06463678 -
Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy And Safety of IVIEW-1201 In the Treatment of Fungal Keratitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05110001 -
Rose Bengal Electromagnetic Activation With Green Light for Infection Reduction
|
Phase 3 |