Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03711409 |
Other study ID # |
TCHIRB-10705119-E |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 25, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
February 28, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
August 2021 |
Source |
National Yang Ming University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Adhesive capsulitis, also known as frozen shoulder (FS), is a condition characterized by the
functional restriction of both active and passive shoulder motion with unremarkable
glenohumeral joint radiographs findings. Shoulder pain almost exists during the whole course
of frozen shoulder. Pain induces muscle spasm and causes pain-spasm-pain cycle resulting in
limited range of motion, changed muscle recruitment pattern and finally influences
neuromuscular control. Commonly used conservative interventions for FS patients include joint
mobilization, corticosteroid injection, exercise, modality and soft tissue mobilization.
Despite joint mobilization is the most commonly used manual therapy in patients with FS, the
evidence level is weak and the efficacy is not superior to other conservative treatments.
Soft tissue mobilization is widely used in lots of musculoskeletal conditions. The effects of
soft tissue mobilization include breaking the adhesion tissue and improving range of motion,
muscle strength and motor control. However, few studies have investigated the effect of soft
tissue mobilization in patients with frozen shoulder. Therefore, the purpose of this study is
to investigate and compare the effect of soft tissue biased manual therapy and conventional
physical therapy in patients with primary FS.
Description:
Adhesive capsulitis, also known as frozen shoulder (FS), is a condition characterized by a
functional restriction of both active and passive shoulder motion with unremarkable
glenohumeral joint radiographs findings. Frozen shoulder is divided into primary and
secondary type. The mechanism of primary FS is still unknown and the secondary FS may
accompany with shoulder injuries. The incidence of primary FS is 2 to 5.8% and the risk
factors are diabetes and thyroid disease.
The course of FS is divided into four consecutive stages which are inflammation, painful,
frozen and thawing phase. Shoulder pain almost exists during the whole course of frozen
shoulder. The pain and discomfort of FS patients are frequently localized to the deltoid
insertion and coracoid process. Pain induces muscle spasm and causes pain-spasm-pain cycle
resulting in limited range of motion, changed muscle recruitment pattern and finally
influences neuromuscular control.
Commonly used conservative interventions for FS patients include joint mobilization,
corticosteroid injection, exercise, modality and soft tissue mobilization. Despite joint
mobilization is the most commonly used manual therapy in patients with FS, the evidence level
is weak and the efficacy is not superior to other conservative treatment s. Soft tissue
mobilization is widely used in lots of musculoskeletal conditions. The effects of soft tissue
mobilization include breaking the adhesion tissue and improving range of motion, muscle
strength and motor control. However, few studies have investigated the effect of soft tissue
mobilization in patients with frozen shoulder. Only one study used one-time muscle release to
FS patients and investigate improvement in shoulder biomechanics, muscle strength and ROM.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the effect of soft tissue
biased manual therapy and conventional physical therapy for six weeks in patients with
primary FS.
The study design is a pretest-posttest control group design. The investigators plan to
recruit 70 patients with primary frozen shoulder and divide them into a soft tissue biased
manual therapy group and a conventional physical therapy group. The sample size is determined
by the previous study. It is based on a significance level of 0.05, and a power of 0.80. The
outcome measures in this study include scapula kinematics, scapula position, the range of
motion, muscle tone, muscle strength, pain and functional impairment.
LIBERTY™ electromagnetic tracking system (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA) was used to collect
three-dimensional kinematic (3D) data during scaption, hand to neck and hand to back tasks at
a sampling rate of 120 Hz, and the software Motion Monitor® (Innovative Sport Training, Inc.,
Chicago. IL. USA) was used to analyze the data. The main measurements of shoulder kinematics
include scapular upward/downward rotation, internal/external rotation, and anterior/posterior
tilt. A stylus was used to digitize the bony landmarks for defining the anatomical coordinate
system. The methods for this measure have been described previously.
For collecting muscle activation data, the investigators used surface electromyography (sEMG,
TeleMyo 2400 G2 Telemetry; Noraxon USA, Inc., USA) to collect scapular muscles' activation
during those tasks. The investigators will measure the muscle activities of the pectoralis
major, upper trapezius, infraspinatus, teres major and lower trapezius. The electrodes will
be placed according to previous studies and be positioned in parallel to the direction of the
muscle fibers.
The range of motion of shoulder flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation
will be measured by plastic universal goniometer according to Norkin's methods. The muscle
strength of lower trapezius, external rotators and internal rotators are measured by the
hand-held dynamometer. The scapula positions are measured by modified scapular sliding test
with calliper during arms by sides, hands on the hips and scaption 90 degrees. The muscle
tone of pectoralis major, upper trapezius, infraspinatus and teres complex will be measured
by hand-held myotonometer (Myoton-Pro, Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia) in shoulder resting
position according to previous studies. The functional impairments are measured by Flexilevel
Scale of Shoulder Function questionnaire. The pain level is measured by the visual analogue
scale.
Participants in the soft tissue biased manual therapy group will receive heat and muscle
release for six weeks and participants in conventional physical therapy group will receive
modalities and joint mobilization for six weeks. The measurement will be obtained at
baseline, 3 weeks, and after the intervention. Repeated measures ANOVA will be used for data
analysis. The level of significance sets at α=0.05.