Clinical Trials Logo

Frozen Shoulder clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Frozen Shoulder.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05391984 Recruiting - Frozen Shoulder Clinical Trials

Effects of Activity Versus Structural Oriented Treatment Approach in Patients With Frozen Shoulder.

Start date: June 7, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of activity versus structural oriented treatment approach on pain, range of motion, and function in diabetic patients with frozen shoulder.

NCT ID: NCT05372497 Completed - Frozen Shoulder Clinical Trials

Central Nervous System Focused Therapy in Frozen Shoulder

Start date: May 11, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Frozen shoulder has been considered a self-limiting and benign disease with complete resolution of pain and ROM, but this can sometimes last for years. This prolonged pain and disability deprives patients of their routine life, occupational and recreational activities. Although appropriate treatment is needed so that they can quickly return to their lives, definitive treatment strategies have not been established and many different management strategies are used. The aim of this study is to investigate whether pain education and sensory education applied together with conventional physiotherapy are more effective than conventional physiotherapy alone.In this study, 21 people diagnosed with frozen shoulder who were referred by the doctor of Esenler Medipol Hospital, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation will be included in the study. Outcome measures: Pain Beliefs Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PainDetect Questionnaire, Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, Electrogoniometer, Two-point discrimination test, Numeric Rating Sleep Scale and Right/ Left Judgement Task. This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial. 21 people were included in the study. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: Conventional physiotherapy group (CP group) (n=11), Conventional physiotherapy plus central nervous system focused treatment group (CP+CNS group) (n=10). Conventional physiotherapy was applied to both groups for 45-60 minutes, 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The CP group treatment session will take place as follows: Scapular mobilization, passive stretches, stick exercises, pendulum exercises and shoulder flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, horizontal abduction/ adduction strengthening exercises. The CP+CNS group received central nervous system focused therapy that included chronic pain education, localization training, graphesthesia, graded motor imagery and mirror therapy in addition to conventional physiotherapy. The IG group protocol includes: 1. week: Initial Evaluation, Conventional physiotherapy (CP), Chronic Pain Education, Localization Training Level 1, Right / Left Discrimination Training 2. week: CP, Motor Imagery, Localization Training Level 2 3. week: CP, Grafestesis Training, Isometric Exercise 4. week: CP, Mirror Therapy, Functional Exercises, Final Evaluation

NCT ID: NCT05299242 Completed - Frozen Shoulder Clinical Trials

The Anti-Freaze-F Study- "Anti-TNF for Treatment of Frozen Shoulder - a Feasibility Study"

Anti-FreazeF
Start date: July 21, 2022
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Frozen shoulder is a common condition affecting approximately 9% of people aged 25-64 years. During the early phase the pain is usually unbearable and the later restriction in movement is severely limiting. It occurs when the flexible tissue (capsule) that surrounds the shoulder joint becomes inflamed, thickened and tight. The pain can be very severe and lasts 3-9 months, followed by a 4-12 month period of increasing stiffness, after which the condition usually improves. Frozen shoulder often affects a person's ability to sleep, carry out everyday activities, and work. Current treatments include rest, painkillers, anti-inflammatories, physiotherapy and steroid injections. If stiffness persists, surgery is sometimes recommended. However, there is no evidence that any of these treatments lead to significant benefit in the long term, with many being ineffective. The aim of this study is to find out if it is possible to run a larger trial to test whether an injection of adalimumab can reduce pain and prevent the disease from getting worse, if given during the early painful phase of frozen shoulder. The investigators need to conduct this smaller study first to be sure it's possible to identify and treat people with early stage frozen shoulder, before they conduct a much larger trial to find out if this treatment works. In this study the investigators will include 84 adults from 5 sites with painful early stage frozen shoulder who have not yet received treatment. People will be randomised to receive either an injection of the drug adalimumab or a dummy injection of saline (placebo) directly into the shoulder joint, both guided by ultrasound. All participants will also receive standardized advice on how to manage their shoulder pain. The investigators will assess participants before treatment and three months later. Adalimumab has been used very successfully to treat other inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. This study has been funded by the NIHR RfPB programme and 180 Life Sciences.

NCT ID: NCT05230667 Recruiting - Adhesive Capsulitis Clinical Trials

Comparison of the Effect of Combined Glenohumeral Joint and Subdeltoid Bursa Injection With Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP), Corticosteroid, and Normal Saline in Addition to Physical Therapy for Treatment of Frozen Shoulder

Start date: August 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Frozen shoulder, adhesive capsulitis, shoulder, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroid, injection.

NCT ID: NCT05212740 Completed - Frozen Shoulder Clinical Trials

Oral Corticosteroids Versus Exercises On Treatment Of Frozen Shoulder,

Start date: January 25, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of exercise and oral corticosteroids the treatment of a FS.

NCT ID: NCT05131269 Completed - Frozen Shoulder Clinical Trials

Prolotherapy Intervention in Patient With Frozen Shoulder

Start date: December 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Introduction : Prolotherapy is regenerative tissue therapy that is considered to be efficacious in reducing symptoms and morbidity of frozen shoulder, but only a few studies demonstrate the effect of prolotherapy at the biomolecular level, particularly the level of Matrix Metalloproteinase- I (MMP-1), Tissue Inhibitor Matrix Metalloproteinase (TIMP-1), as the biomarkers of cartilage repair. Objective: To determine the effect of prolotherapy on MMP-1, TIMP-1, and functional outcomes in frozen shoulder patients Method: a double-blind randomized controlled trial study involving participants who had been diagnosed with Frozen Shoulder. History taking, functional outcome assessment, MMP-1, and TIMP-1 were measured. The prolotherapy via intraarticular and extraarticular was performed four times, followed by the evaluation of functional outcome, MMP-1, and TIMP-1 at week 12 Alternative Hypothesis : Prolotherapy will increase the MMP-1, TIMP-1 levels, and improve functional outcome among Frozen Shoulder patients

NCT ID: NCT05001438 Not yet recruiting - Frozen Shoulder Clinical Trials

MUA's Efficacy in Frozen Shoulder in Patients Which Already Received an Hidrodilatation

Start date: August 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hidrodilatation alone is as efective as Hidrodilatation + Movilization under anesthesia to treat the frozen shoulder

NCT ID: NCT04965376 Recruiting - Frozen Shoulder Clinical Trials

A Trial Comparing Glenohumeral Joint Steroid Injection Versus Suprascapular Nerve Block in Patients With Frozen Shoulder

TIFFS
Start date: August 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to determine if there is any difference in terms of pain relief in patients with frozen shoulder, when given a steroid injection as a suprascapular nerve block compared to a glenohumeral joint intra-articular injection. The investigators hypothesis is that there is a significant difference in terms of pain relief at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year between a steroid injection as a suprascapular nerve block compared to a glenohumeral joint intra-articular injection. Participants who attend the orthopaedic clinic and are diagnosed with unilateral frozen shoulder and who are suitable to be treated with a steroid injection will be identified. If the participant consents to having a steroid injection, he/she will then be invited to participate in the trial where they will have an injection either into the glenohumeral joint (ball and socket joint of the shoulder) or as a suprascapular nerve block (injection adjacent to a nerve over the shoulder blade) under ultrasound guidance. Participants will then be followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months after their injection and asked to complete a set of questionnaires assessing pain, function and movement. The results of the groups will then be compared to see if one treatment is superior to the other.

NCT ID: NCT04931511 Terminated - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

Comparison Between Subacromial Ultrasound Guided and Systemic Steroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder

Start date: June 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study aim to compare the efficacy of guteal muscle injection and subacromial ultrasound guided injection to treat frozen shoulder. Firstly, in order to calculate the sample size correctly, we start the preliminary study. Besides, in order to propose clinical new technology which combines the advantages of the two therapies, improve the efficacy ratio of frozen shoulder therapy, and provide a frozen shoulder treatment plan according to health economics.

NCT ID: NCT04859387 Completed - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Technique VS Traditional Physical Therapy

PSTVSTPT
Start date: April 15, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Isolated and combined effectiveness of pragmatic protocols on shoulder range of motion had been investigated and found effective in healthy participants. To our knowledge, there was insufficient literature to support the comparison between pragmatic and traditional protocols in the treatment of shoulder pathologies.