Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01046747
Other study ID # IRB - 12415 Pin Study
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received January 8, 2010
Last updated January 11, 2010
Start date July 2009

Study information

Verified date August 2009
Source Temple University
Contact John R Fowler, MD
Phone 215-707-4545
Email fowler@temple.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Hypothesis

There is no difference in the incidence of pin tract infection and pin loosening in case of lower extremity external fixators when self-drilling schanz pins are used with or without pre-drilling.

Primary Objective

The primary objective is to determine whether pre-drilling holes for external fixation pin insertion is superior to not pre-drilling holes for external fixation pin insertion in regards to the incidence of pin tract infection and pin loosening.

Secondary Objective

If any difference is found between the two techniques then, we will quantify and qualify those differences. The incidence of pin site infection and pin loosening in general will be determined and will also be stratified for site and size of pin. An attempt to identify risk factors for pin site infection will be made by observing the effect of secondary prognostic factors like mode of injury, diabetes, smoking, compartment syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, neurovascular injury. Interobserver reliability of the grading system for pin infection will also be determined.


Description:

Background

The application of external fixation is a commonly performed emergency procedure in orthopaedics for temporary stabilization as well as definitive treatment of fractures. External fixation requires that metal pins be placed into the bone on either side of the fracture. The pins are then connected to an external frame, thus stabilizing the fracture. There is debate over the optimal technique for the insertion of these pins in regards to the need to pre-drill a pilot hole prior to pin insertion.

The technology behind external fixation has evolved greatly over the past thirty years. The original external fixation pins, "Shanz pins," were essentially metal rods with threads and a trocar point. A pilot hole was needed because these pins did not have the capability to create their own hole or path in the bone. Recent advances have lead to the creation of self-drilling/self-tapping pins, which have decreased the number of steps necessary to place the pins and thereby decreased operative time. The external fixators are usually placed as a temporary measure to allow for improvement of soft tissue condition before definitive open reduction and internal fixation. Since many external fixation devices are placed in patients who are critically ill, decreasing operative time is very important.

While saving operative time is essential it is also important that the device serves its purpose without leading to complications in the short term. The major complications related to external fixation are pin site infection and pin loosening. The literature is clear that high temperatures created during pin insertion leads to bone necrosis surrounding the pin, increased infection, and increased rates of loosening. It is unclear if the new generation self-drilling pins create the same amount of necrosis as the older generation of pins. Lab studies have shown increased temperatures with direct drilling with these pins as compared to pin insertion after drilling pilot holes with dedicated drill bits. It is unclear if this increased temperature results in increased rate of loosening or pin site infection in clinical practice.

A thorough literature search has revealed no randomized controlled studies to support the use of these pins without drilling pilot holes before insertion. The current standard of care is undefined and left to surgeon preference. Our study aims to provide guidelines for schanz pin insertion for external fixator application, which may help to reduce the number of pin tract infections suffered by patients and improve outcomes.

Study Design and Treatment Plan

This will be a prospective, randomized, within-subject, single-blind trial to be conducted at Temple University Hospital. Patients who are determined to require an external fixation procedure of the lower extremities due to fracture or dislocation will be considered for enrollment according to the above inclusion criteria. Standard of care for treatment of their fractures will be provided. Once patients have provided informed consent for enrollment in the study, their pins will be randomized in a paired design according to a computer generated randomization schedule. There will be two types of pins, pre-drilled and non pre-drilled. A standard external fixation device requires two pins on each side of the fracture. Each pair of pins will have one each of pre-drilled and not pre-drilled pins, according to the randomization schedule. Therefore, each patient will have two pre-drilled pins and two pins inserted without pre-drilling. Some surgeons may prefer three pins on each side of the fracture/dislocation that is to be immobilized. We will have a randomization protocol for these situations as well.

The computer generated randomization algorithm will be placed in a secure location in sealed opaque envelopes. The operating surgeon will open the envelope prior to pin insertion and follow the randomization schedule as prescribed in the envelope.

A standard technique will be followed. IV antibiotics will be administered within 60 minutes of the starting skin incision. Pin insertion will be done by standard techniques. This involves a 1 cm incision, and blunt dissection. 4.0 mm (calcaneal or metatarsal), 5.0 mm (tibia) or 6.0 mm (femur) pins will be inserted by one of two techniques: (1) self drilling pins are inserted with a power drill directly into the bone; (2) a standard twist drill bit is utilized with a power drill to create a pilot hole, followed by insertion of the self-drilling pin by power drill.

Soft tissue relaxation incisions are made according to standard technique after external fixation assembly, as needed. The pin care protocol will consist of daily pin site cleaning using dilute hydrogen peroxide and dry dressings. Patients with suspected pin site infection will be treated with Keflex 500mg po q 6hr. Patients with an allergy to Keflex will receive Clindamycin 300mg po q 6hr.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date
Est. primary completion date August 2011
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 89 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18-89

2. Fluency in spoken/ written English/ Spanish (consent form in Spanish will be needed)

3. Lower extremity fracture/ dislocation treated with an external fixator

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prisoners

2. Patients unable to give informed consent

3. Patients who require that pins be placed without skin coverage at the pin site

4. Patients receiving Ilizarov or other circular external fixators with transfixing wires.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Placement of external fixation pins
The fractures will be treated according to standard of care. If the external fixation is to be used as a staging procedure, then this will be removed and an internal fixation procedure will be performed. The pin sites will be checked daily according to standard of care. All individuals involved in the examination of the pin sites will receive a standardized training in the grading of pin tract infection and loosening. Each pin site will be graded individually by three persons to evaluate internal accuracy of our grading. Pin tract infections will be first graded as yes or no, and then graded according to the Modified Joglekar Classification (Grade 0-4, Grade 0: no erythema, no drainage; Grade 1: erythema, no drainage OR no erythema with serous drainage; Grade 2: erythema, serous drainage; Grade 3: erythema, purulent drainage; Grade 4: gross pin loosening). Pin loosening will be evaluated at the time of pin removal and graded as either yes or no.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Temple University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Temple University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (7)

Abouzgia MB, Symington JM. Effect of drill speed on bone temperature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Oct;25(5):394-9. — View Citation

Antoci V, Ono CM, Antoci V Jr, Raney EM. Pin-tract infection during limb lengthening using external fixation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008 Sep;37(9):E150-4. — View Citation

Bachus KN, Rondina MT, Hutchinson DT. The effects of drilling force on cortical temperatures and their duration: an in vitro study. Med Eng Phys. 2000 Dec;22(10):685-91. — View Citation

Bonfield W, Li CH. The temperature dependence of the deformation of bone. J Biomech. 1968 Dec;1(4):323-9. — View Citation

Moroni A, Faldini C, Marchetti S, Manca M, Consoli V, Giannini S. Improvement of the bone-pin interface strength in osteoporotic bone with use of hydroxyapatite-coated tapered external-fixation pins. A prospective, randomized clinical study of wrist fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 May;83-A(5):717-21. — View Citation

Seitz WH Jr, Froimson AI, Brooks DB, Postak P, Polando G, Greenwald AS. External fixator pin insertion techniques: biomechanical analysis and clinical relevance. J Hand Surg Am. 1991 May;16(3):560-3. — View Citation

Ziran BH, Smith WR, Anglen JO, Tornetta P 3rd. External fixation: how to make it work. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1620-32. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary pin tract infection until pins are removed No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT04470895 - Impact of Drugs on the Risk of Falls in the Fracture Department of the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group
Recruiting NCT02635022 - Fragility Fracture Liaison Service and Anti-osteoporosis Medication Monitoring Service Study
Unknown status NCT02013986 - Effects of Etomidate on Postoperative Circadian Rhythm Changes of Salivary Cortisol in Children Phase 4
Terminated NCT01248182 - Bone to Skin Thickness Study: Obese Versus Normal Population N/A
Recruiting NCT00969839 - NovaLign Intramedullary Fixation System (IFS) for the Treatment of Humeral Fractures Phase 4
Completed NCT00115180 - Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Acute Pain Control N/A
Completed NCT00520442 - Acute Pediatric Fracture Analgesia Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06402292 - Surgical Treatment of Osteoarticular Infections Using Bioactive Bone Substitute N/A
Recruiting NCT04947722 - The PREVENT Trial: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multifaceted Fracture Prevention Model for Long-term Care N/A
Recruiting NCT06107699 - The CHARM Study-Coordinating Transitions From Hospital for Older Adults With Fractures N/A
Completed NCT04532580 - Clinical Validation of Boneview for FDA Submission
Completed NCT04237454 - Thermal Imaging Compared to Skeletal Survey in Children Below 2 Years N/A
Recruiting NCT05002335 - Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Medacta Shoulder System (BE)
Completed NCT02591043 - Surgical Treatment of Low Energy Pelvic Fractures in the Elderly N/A
Completed NCT02933359 - Osteogenic Profiling of Normal Calvarial Bone
Completed NCT01049191 - Bone Microarchitecture in Women With and Without Fracture N/A
Completed NCT03431857 - Multi Centre Study on TESS V2 Shoulder System
Recruiting NCT04133103 - Early Mobilisation in the Surgical Robot Assisted Spinal Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03993691 - Wrist Fracture Evaluation With a Desktop Orthopedic Tomosynthesis System N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01719887 - Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Surgical Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures. Randomized Controlled Trial N/A