Fluorescein Angiography Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Timing and Image Quality of Different Phases of Optos Fluorescein Angiography Between Two Doses of Intravenous Fluorescein: 250mg Versus 500mg
Verified date | March 2020 |
Source | Kresge Eye Institute |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Fluorescein angiography is a common procedure used in ophthalmology to diagnose and monitor diseases of the eye. The standard dose of fluorescein dye used in fluorescein angiography is 500mg. It is common practice to give patients who have previously had an adverse reaction to fluorescein dye a half-dose, or 250mg, of fluorescein. It has been determined by our institution that anecdotally, there is no difference in image quality between the images created by a half-dose of fluorescein versus a full dose of fluorescein. Therefore, this study seeks to determine whether these doses are actually equivalent in terms of image quality. Patients who consent to participate in the study will be randomized to receive either a half or a full dose of intravenous fluorescein, and their images will be compared subjectively using a masked team of retinal surgeons and residents. We hypothesize that there will be no significant difference between the images obtained using a half-dose versus a full dose of intravenous fluorescein.
Status | Suspended |
Enrollment | 79 |
Est. completion date | December 1, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | July 17, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 120 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patients scheduled for fluorescein angiography at Kresge Eye Institute. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with known major profusion defects on fluorescein angiography. - Patients with prior adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography. - Patients with significant photophobia as judged by the photographer. - Patients with visually significant cataracts. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Kresge Eye Institute | Detroit | Michigan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Kresge Eye Institute |
United States,
Moosbrugger KA, Sheidow TG. Evaluation of the side effects and image quality during fluorescein angiography comparing 2 mL and 5 mL sodium fluorescein. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;43(5):571-5. doi: 10.3129/i08-122. — View Citation
Nicholson BP, Nigam D, Miller D, Agrón E, Dalal M, Jacobs-El N, da Rocha Lima B, Cunningham D, Nussenblatt R, Sen HN. Comparison of wide-field fluorescein angiography and 9-field montage angiography in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;157(3):673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 7. — View Citation
Xu K, Tzankova V, Li C, Sharma S. Intravenous fluorescein angiography-associated adverse reactions. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;51(5):321-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Sep 3. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography performed on the same patient. | Participants who receive two clinically-indicated fluorescein angiography procedures within the time frame of the study will receive both doses of Fluorescein Na (250mg and 500mg). These two images will then be compared to each other in terms of image quality by a team of masked retinal surgeons. | Six months. | |
Secondary | Subjective comparison of image quality between full-dose and half-dose fluorescein angiography among all patients enrolled in the study. | All of the images obtained during the patient recruitment phase of the study will be evaluated subjectively in terms of image quality by a panel of masked retinal surgeons. The images will then be compared between patients to determine if there is a subjective difference in image quality between a 250mg and 500mg dose. | One month. |