Flap Advancement Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Double-Flap Incision, Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision, and Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Periosteal Releasing Incision for Flap Advancement in Partially Edentulous Patients Undergoing Guided Bone Regeneration Using Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Verified date | July 2020 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is a reliable method to augment insufficient bone volume for implant placement. Membrane exposure is a major complication which is avoided by tension free primary closure. Classically Periosteal Releasing Incision (PRI) is performed to advance the flap. The aim of this trial is to compare Double Flap Incision (DFI), Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision (MPRI) & Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap (CALF) to PRI in terms of flap advancement, postoperative pain & swelling, membrane exposure and the amount of bone gain clinically and radiographically in GBR procedures.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 38 |
Est. completion date | September 30, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | August 30, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Partially edentulous patients in the mandibular posterior region. 2. Patients with healthy systemic condition. 3. Insufficient ridge width (< 5mm). 4. Presence of proper inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part. 5. Adequate soft tissue biotype (= 2mm). 6. No clinical evidence of active periodontal disease or oral infections. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with systemic conditions that may interfere with the results of the study. 2. Patients with local pathological defects related to the area of interest. 3. Unmotivated, uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene. 4. Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as smoking, alcoholism or para-functional habits. 5. History of bone associated diseases or medication affecting bone metabolism e.g.; bisphosphonate treatment. 6. History of radiation therapy in the head or neck region. 7. Current anti-tumor chemotherapy. 8. Pregnancy. 9. Inflammatory and autoimmune diseases of the oral cavity. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Cairo University | Cairo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Postoperative membrane exposure | Measure the dimensions of the exposure using a periodontal probe in millimeters. | will be evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24 weeks postoperative | |
Other | Bone width gain | The amount of bone gain will be measured before and after in millimeters on a cone beam CT & Clinically using bone caliper. | preoperative & 6 months postoperative. | |
Primary | Flap advancement | Flap advancement in millimeters will be measured as the difference before and after Double flap Incision, Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision, Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap, and Periosteal Releasing Incision in millimeters using periodontal probe. | Intraoperative | |
Secondary | Postoperative Pain | Pain will be recorded using Numerical Rating scale (NRS). It is a scale from 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates severe pain. | 7 days postoperatively | |
Secondary | Postoperative Swelling | will be recorded using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). It is a scale from 0 to 4. 0 indicates no swelling while 4 indicates severe extra-oral swelling. | 7 days postoperatively |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03071523 -
Flap Advancement Techniques in Ridge Augmentation
|
N/A |