View clinical trials related to Fistula.
Filter by:This is a global, multi-center, prospective, post-market, confirmatory, interventional, non-randomized, single-arm clinical investigation evaluating arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation by means of the WavelinQ™ EndoAVF System in patients who require a vascular access for hemodialysis (HD).
Patients with a chronic kidney disease who opt for hemodialysis, needs a well-functioning hemodialysis access. The autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is recognized as the golden standard of dialysis access. Unfortunately a great number of the AVFs fail to mature, and therefore cannot be used for dialysis. A significant stenosis is a major cause of nonmaturing AVFs. Remarkable are the stenoses that seem to develop in the venous outflow tract where the vascular clamp was located during surgery. The primary aim of this study was to compare bloodless surgery using vascular clamps and a tourniquet with respect to the development of hemodynamic or anatomical significant stenosis in patients with a brachiocephalic or radiocephalic AVF.
The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of treatment (medical and/or surgical) on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in participants with Crohn's Disease (CD) and Complex Perianal Fistula (CPF), by the Quality of Life in patients with Anal Fistula Questionnaire (QoLAF-Q), at 12 months after treatment initiation in routine clinical practice.
This is a two stage, prospective, multi-center study to evaluate the EchoMark and EchoSure devices in patients undergoing peripheral arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis access.
The purpose of this study is to compare the application of alginate dressings with silver and high-G cellulose and the use of simple gauge dressings in patients submitted to surgical resection of pilonidal cyst. The present trial will focus on the postoperative quality of life during the secondary intention wound healing.
In the study, the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is applied to total pancreatectomy (TP) and low-risk pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) patients identified by a small number of acinar cells in the cut edge of the pancreas. The research setting is randomized and controlled. All patients arriving at the Tampere University Hospital (TAUH) for PD or TP surgery are recruited into the study. Recruited patients are randomized to the ERAS protocol and to the standard protocol recovery program. The ERAS program differs from the normal care protocol preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively as explained in the following section. In the ERAS protocol, both on the previous day of the surgery and on the following days, the patient is discussed with the patient about the benefits of the protocol used and the recovery program objectives. The purpose is to motivate and encourage the patient. On the day of surgery, the patient's intake of food and fluids is allowed to be closer to the surgery and the patient is also given a carbohydrate drink two hours before surgery. The nasogastric tube set at the beginning of surgery is removed at the end of the surgery and peripancreatic or perihepatic drains are not routinely placed. After surgery, drinking is allowed after four hours and the patient is encouraged to move as actively as possible in the bed. On the first and second postoperative day, the patient is allowed to enjoy normal food and drink according to his or her ability, and pancreatic capsules are given in the course of food. Additionally, the analgesic to be administered through the epidural cannula is dosed as far as possible to allow mobilization of the patient. The discussion on the benefits and recovery targets of the ERAS protocol are continued. On the third postoperative day, the epidural infusion is discontinued and the pain medication is moved to opioid-based pain management. This is continued until specific criteria for passing to the follow-up care are met. Typical complications (pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage) are registered during hospitalization and their severity ratings according to ISGPS, ISPGF and Clavien-Dindo classifications are also determined. Other variables registered are the number of intensive care days, situations requiring new surgeries, 30 and 90 day mortality, the completion time of the criteria for passing to follow up care, and the total length of hospitalization. In addition, the need for readmissions is registered. The implementation of the ERAS protocol is followed by a separate tracking template, in which the nurses record the progress of the goals specified in the protocol on a daily basis. The results of the study are analyzed with the intention-to-treat principle.
The incidence of clinically significant anastomotic leaks (AL) after upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is approximately 4 % - 20 %, and the associated mortality can be as high as 80 % . Nutritional support is a key component of therapy in such cases, related to high prevalence of malnutrition and nil per month required for leak treatment. In the prophylactic setting, before the occurrence of any AL, a literature review based on seven randomised trials showed that enteral nutrition (EN) is associated with shorter hospital stay, lower incidence of severe of infectious complications, lower severity of complications and decreased cost compared to parenteral nutrition (TPN) following major upper GI surgery . In the curative setting, after the AL occurrence, very few evidence is available. Only one randomized clinical trial suggested the superiority of EN versus TPN after pancreatic surgery with a increase of the 30-day fistula closure rate from 37% in the TPN group to 60% in the EN group . This sole randomised study available did not include all postoperative upper GI AL (PUGIAL) that can occur after esophageal, gastric, duodenal, pancreatic surgery (including obesity surgery), whereas the concept of enteral nutritional support is highly relevant for all these situations. However surgeons are usually reluctant to provide EN in case of AL. A randomized study suggested the feasibility of EN in 47 patients with upper GI AL but no randomized study to date has been designed to test the superiority of EN versus TPN in PUGIAL. The study aim is to demonstrate the superiority of EN versus TPN to accelerate AL healing after upper GI surgery. Hypothesis: EN increases the 30-day fistula closure rate in PUGIAL, allowing better HRQOL without increasing morbi-mortality.
This open-label pilot randomized controlled trial will test the feasibility and safety of randomizing patients over 65 years old who start hemodialysis with a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC), and are eligible to receive either arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG), to an AVF strategy (comparator) or to an AVG strategy (intervention). The primary outcome is feasibility, which we will assess by measuring: (1) the proportion of randomized participants who receive the assigned arteriovenous access; and (2) the annual rate of enrollment in the study, accounting for the number of surgeons who participate. Secondary outcomes will include perioperative morbidity and mortality, catheter removal rates, additional procedures performed, and the reasons a patient may not receive the assigned AV access.
This prospective, single arm, single-center study is designed to evaluate the performance of the FLEX Scoring Catheter®/POBA/DCB in A-V access circuits.
This trial aims to determine if intra-operative use of human dehydrated amnion chorion allograft improves post-operative patient healing outcomes.