Clinical Trials Logo

Finger Injuries clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Finger Injuries.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05003596 Not yet recruiting - Hand Injuries Clinical Trials

Efficacy of Steroids on Functional Outcomes After Musculoskeletal Injuries of the Hand

Start date: September 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Steroids are often prescribed for their anti-inflammatory effects in patients with musculoskeletal injuries. Studies have shown that steroids may reduce pain and swelling, but their effects on range of motion and functional outcomes have not been illustrated. With this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of steroids on range of motion and functional outcomes in non-operatively managed musculoskeletal injuries of the hand.

NCT ID: NCT00310570 Not yet recruiting - Mallet Finger Clinical Trials

Comparison of Splinting Interventions for Treating Mallet Finger Injuries

Start date: May 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Stubbing of the finger-tip is a common injury in sports such as basketball, volleyball, cricket and football. This can result in a Mallet finger deformity, where the end joint of a finger cannot be actively straightened out. In most mallet finger cases seen at The Alfred, the skin remains intact, and the impairment results from a tear of the extensor tendon or an avulsion (a small fracture where the tendon attaches to the bone). Treatment commonly involves immobilising the end joint of the finger in a splint for six or more weeks so patient compliance is a major factor in the quality of the outcome achieved. This study aims to compare two different types of splintage (the commonly used thermoplastic thimble splint and the aluminium-foam “Mexican hat” splint which is in use in Britain) with a control splint (thermoplastic prefabricated “stack splint” with tape). Outcome measures will include patient compliance with the splint, degree of extensor lag, active movement of the joint, and any complications. The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in outcome between different methods of conservative splinting treatment for mallet finger.