Fibromyalgia (FM) Clinical Trial
Official title:
Mechanistic Perspective on EEG Based Amygdala Driven NF in Fibromyalgia
Verified date | February 2024 |
Source | Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The goal of this study is to test whether voluntary regulation of limbic system activation is possible in patients with fibromyalgia and to examine the neurobehavioral effects of specific neuromodulation of this circuit on somatosensory, limbic, and cognitive processes. This goal will be achieved by using a method previously developed for the construction of an fMRI-enriched EEG model ("EEG-Finger-Print", EFP) that selectively targets the amygdala BOLD activation (Amyg-EFP). The investigators conducted two studies: In the first study, the investigators conducted simultaneous recordings of EEG and fMRI during Amyg-EFP NF training on patients with FM. The main objective is to demonstrate target engagement following Amyg-EFP-NF training in FM patients. In the second study, the investigators aim to conduct a randomized clinical trial to examine the causal effect of the Amyg-EFP NF trial. The investigators will compare neurobehavioral effects between three groups. I. Amyg-EFP-NF group: a multisession NF trial using the Amyg-EFP model. II. Control group 1- sham-NF: a multisession NF trial using sham feedback. III. Control group 2: patients in this group will continue their usual treatment without intervention.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 70 |
Est. completion date | August 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 55 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age: 18-55 - Fibromyalgia diagnosis by a specialist in internal medicine, Neurology or Pain medicine - Subjective complaints about sleep disorder - Pain does not stop despite regular medication- at least three events per week of pain ranked five out of ten - chronic drug treatment should not be change in the near future (6 weeks). - Hebrew speaker - Accepted criteria for MRI scan for medical use will be followed, according to the procedures prescribed in the MRI institute of the Tel-Aviv Sourasky medical center. Exclusion Criteria: - Non-Hebrew speakers - Diagnosis of another pain chronic syndrome or any significant medical illness. - History of psychiatric or neurological diseases requiring hospitalization. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Israel | Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center | Tel Aviv | N/A = Not Applicable |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center |
Israel,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Brain pattern Changes | Measured via real-time fMRI; region of interest analysis in the amygdala; comparison between post vs pre scans: change in blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response to regulate > baseline condition during NF task. | Change in neural pattern immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level (Post-intervention vs. Baseline) | |
Other | Amyg-EFP-NF regulation success | Measured by change in Amyg-EFP power; based on the difference between regulate and baseline conditions during the neurofeedback cycles | 1-10 weeks | |
Other | Pain Assessment | Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)- which assesses somatosensory function and provides thermal pain thresholds and sensory threshold. | Change in pain level immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level (Post-intervention vs. Baseline) | |
Other | Sleep assessment | The investigators were measured via one-night sleep monitoring using the WatchPAT-200 device.
While the specific range scores for sleep latency and sleep efficiency using the WatchPAT-200 are not explicitly detailed in the available documentation, it's generally accepted in sleep studies that normal sleep efficiency is considered to be 85% or higher. Normal sleep onset latency typically ranges from 10 to 25 minutes. To evaluate sleep quality, the investigators calculate a combined score using two sleep metrics: sleep latency and sleep efficiency. |
Change in sleep quality immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level (Post-intervention vs. Baseline) | |
Primary | Clinical improvement using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) to evaluate FM symptoms | Scoring from 0 (no impairment) to 80 (maximum), with subscales ranging up to 10 (maximum). | Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level | |
Primary | Clinical improvement using the Symptom Severity Score (SSS) | Ranges from 0 to 12 (highest severity). | Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level | |
Primary | Clinical improvement using the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) | Ranges from 0 to 19 (highest level of pain distribution). | Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level | |
Primary | Clinical improvement using the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) to evaluate daily impacts of FM | Scores from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate better health). | Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level | |
Primary | Clinical improvement using the Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) to evaluate the level of anxiety | Ranges from 20 to 80 (highest anxiety level). | Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level | |
Primary | Clinical improvement using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) to evaluate the level of depression | Ranges from 0 to 63 (highest depression level). | Immediately post-intervention relative to the baseline level | |
Primary | Long-term clinical improvement using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) to evaluate FM symptoms | Scoring from 0 (no impairment) to 80 (maximum), with subscales ranging up to 10 (maximum). | Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline) | |
Primary | Long-term clinical improvement using the Symptom Severity Score (SSS) | Ranges from 0 to 12 (highest severity). | Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline) | |
Primary | Long-term clinical improvement using the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) | Ranges from 0 to 19 (highest level of pain distribution). | Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline) | |
Primary | Long-term clinical improvement using the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) to evaluate daily impacts of FM | Scores from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate better health). | Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline) | |
Primary | Long-term clinical improvement using the Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) to evaluate the level of anxiety | Ranges from 20 to 80 (highest anxiety level). | Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline) | |
Primary | Long-term clinical improvement using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) to evaluate the level of depression | Ranges from 0 to 63 (highest depression level). | Change in symptoms at 10-12 months relative to the baseline level (Follow-up measure vs. Baseline) | |
Secondary | Neural Prediction | Simultaneous fMRI/EEG scan in order to identify whether the Amyg-EFP signal reliably predicts the amygdala BOLD activity | Through study completion, an average of 2 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04174300 -
Molecular Response to Custom Manual Physiotherapy Treatment of Fibromyalgia & Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05230602 -
Consuming of Opuntia Among Women With Fibromyalgia
|
N/A |