Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Other |
The feasibility and acceptability of EPO Feeding program: Observation checklist |
Process evaluation: observation checklist. The researcher will make fieldnotes about the module delivery and responses to the modules provided on the program, barriers and enablers of the program completion, participants' task engagement and its overall structure, delivery, and content of the program. |
Week 1,2,3,4 (record in each intervention) |
|
| Other |
The feasibility and acceptability of EPO Feeding program: Fidelity checklist |
The fidelity checklist of the EPO Feeding program delivery will be used to measure how closely they adhere to the manual and the underpinned theoretical models. All modules will be audio recorded by a facilitator and watched by another researcher to rate against the fidelity checklists and ensure modules are delivered as intended. |
Week 4,5 (after intervention) |
|
| Primary |
Retention rate |
The percentage of participants who complete the intervention. |
Record in each module (week 1,2,3,4); retention rate will be caculated after completing intervention (week4) |
|
| Primary |
Attendance/Adherence |
Number of modules attended |
Attendance record in each module (week 1,2,3,4) |
|
| Primary |
Recruitment rate |
Recruitment rates: The percentage of participants take part in the intervention. |
Baseline |
|
| Primary |
Participants Acceptance of Intervention |
An anonymous survey containing eight closed questions (e.g., How would you rate the quality of the program? How valuable was the program in helping you optimise feeding practices?) and one open question (i.e., comments on the experiences or feelings about the program) after the intervention. Each item is rated on a 10-point Likert scale. The acceptability will be calculated by averaging the scores of all the items with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the program. |
Week 4 (after intervention) |
|
| Primary |
Participants Acceptance of Intervention2 |
Process evaluation of the program: semi-structured interviews with participants. The interview topic guide will be used to instruct the interview (e.g., participants' advice and suggestions on the program, outcome measures, and randomization). |
Week 4,5 (after intervention) |
|
| Primary |
Provider Acceptance of Intervention (healthcare professionals) |
Process evaluation of the program: semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals who will deliver the program (e.g., their advice and suggestions on the program). |
Week 4,5 (after intervention) |
|
| Primary |
The completion rates of the outcome measures |
The percentage of the participants complete the questionnaires at each time point. |
Baseline, after intervention (week 4), and one-month follow-up (week 8,9) |
|
| Secondary |
Parental feeding practices |
The Chinese Preschoolers' Caregivers' Feeding Behavior Scale (CPCFBS) will be used to evaluate parental restrictive feeding, pressure to eat, monitoring, encouragement of healthy eating and modeling. The Chinese version of the Child Feeding Questionnaire (C-CFQ) will be used to assess use of food as a reward. Each item of CPCFBS and C-CFQ is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The response options for each item are 1"never", 2"rarely", 3"sometimes", 4"usually", and 5"always". Each subscale is calculated by averaging the scores of all the items in that subscale with higher scores indicating a greater prevalence of that feeding practice. (positive/responsive feeding: monitoring, encouragement of healthy eating and modeling; negative/non-responsive feeding: restrictive feeding, pressure to eat and reward) |
Baseline, after intervention (week 4), and one-month follow-up (week 8,9) |
|
| Secondary |
Parental self-reported perception of preschool child weight |
The Chinese version of the Child Feeding Questionnaire (C-CFQ) will be used to measure self-reported perception of child weight by asking, "How would you describe your child's weight?". Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The responses include 1"very underweight," 2"slightly underweight," 3"normal weight," 4"slightly overweight," and 5"very overweight." |
Baseline, after intervention (week 4), and one-month follow-up (week 8,9) |
|
| Secondary |
Parental visual perception of child weight |
Parental visual perception of child weight will be assessed by the perception of Healthy Weight (PPHW) in the age range 2 to 6 years old. The parent will be asked to select one gender from an appropriate image/sketch that most closely matches the child's body type on a 7-point scale (1 = a severely underweight child, 4 = an average-weight child, 7 = an obese child). |
Baseline, after intervention (week 4), and one-month follow-up (week 8,9) |
|
| Secondary |
Parenting Sense of Competence |
The Chinese version of Parenting Sense of Competence Scale will be used to assess parental perception of their abilities to manage the demands of parenting. It includes two subscales: Efficacy and Satisfaction. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale from "Absolutely disagree" to "Absolutely agree". Each subscale is calculated by averaging the scores of all the items in that subscale with higher scores indicating a greater efficacy and satisfaction of parenting role. |
Baseline, after intervention (week 4), and one-month follow-up (week 8,9) |
|
| Secondary |
Child eating behaviors |
Five types of child eating behaviors are assessed by the Chinese Preschoolers' Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CPEBQ), including food fussiness, satiety responsiveness, food responsiveness, emotional eating and initiative eating. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating a greater prevalence of that eating behavior. The response options for each item are 1"never", 2"rarely", 3"sometimes", 4"usually", and 5"always". Each subscale is calculated by averaging the scores of all the items in that subscale. (positive eating behaviors: initiative eating; negative eating behaviors: food fussiness, satiety responsiveness, food responsiveness, and emotional eating) |
Baseline, after intervention (week 4), and one-month follow-up (week 8,9) |
|
| Secondary |
Child weight status |
BMI Z-scores are categorized into three groups: underweight (Z-score < -2), normal weight (-2 = Z-score = 1), overweight (1 < Z-score = 2) and obese (Z-score > 2) |
Baseline, after intervention (week 4), and one-month follow-up (week 8,9) |
|