Educational-Medical-Behavioral Treatment of Fecal Incontinence

Fecal Incontinence Clinical Trial

— FIX  

Official title:

Conservative Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Community-Based Effectiveness Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01717456
• Other study ID #: 11-1569
• Secondary ID: R01HS018695
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• First received: September 15, 2012
• Last updated: February 16, 2017
• Start date: January 2013
• Est. completion date: March 2015

Study information

• Verified date: February 2017
• Source: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In previous studies at a university referral center the investigators demonstrated that a multicomponent conservative treatment for fecal incontinence was effective. The treatment combines patient education with medical management of diarrhea and constipation plus behavioral training. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this treatment is effective when delivered by home health care nurses to frail elderly patients.

Description:

Fecal incontinence (FI) affects 9% of U.S. adults and occurs weekly or more often in 2.7%. Prevalence increases with age reaching 15% by 70 years. FI has a devastating impact on quality of life and substantially increases caregiver burden when patients have comorbid conditions requiring caregiver assistance. The investigators propose an effectiveness trial whose overall goal is to determine whether a conservative intervention which has been shown to be effective in single-site studies will sustain its efficacy when disseminated to a home bound population by home health care nurses. The treatment includes patient education about the physiology of how continence is maintained, pelvic floor exercises, behavioral strategies for preventing FI, and use of fiber or nonprescription medication to treat diarrhea or constipation. To minimize drift when the treatment is disseminated to a large group of providers, patient education and other basic components of treatment are included in a printed training manual and are available to nurse providers on a website; however, nurse supervision to individualize treatment remains important. The study will be carried out in 8 counties in central North Carolina which are served by the University of North Carolina Home Health Care and Rex Home Health Care agencies (partners in this study). Nurses in these agencies will be randomly assigned to two groups. For the first two years all patients of the nurses in one group will receive the active intervention while all patients of nurses in the other group will receive usual care plus a training manual and symptom monitoring to control for expectancy. After two years, all patients in these home health care agencies will receive the active intervention. After excluding patients with severe cognitive impairment and those with stomas, the investigators estimate 252 - 340 patients with FI who are over age 50 will receive treatment (at least 189 in active treatment and 63 controls). Specific aims are (1) to show that the active treatment is more effective than the control treatment for improving FI severity, patient quality of life, and caregiver burden, and that improvements are maintained for at least 6 months; (2) to identify moderators of treatment effectiveness (candidate variables are cognitive status, mobility impairment, willingness of family caregiver to assist with treatment, anxiety, depression, age, and race); and (3) to explore whether successful treatment of FI reduces the risk of nursing home referral.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 31
• Est. completion date: March 2015
• Est. primary completion date: March 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Self-reported fecal incontinence at least once a month

• Family caregiver available and willing to participate in treatment sessions and willing to assist patient with study procedures

• Patients and caregivers willing to be interviewed by a research assistant in their home on three occasions

• Onset of fecal incontinence more than 3 months previously (i.e., not transient fecal incontinence)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Has a stoma or fecal incontinence status is unknown

• Has fecal incontinence less than monthly

• Severe cognitive impairment (response of 4 on OASIS question M1700)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fecal Incontinence

Intervention

Other:
• Education
Patient and caregiver will be taught which muscles are used in continence and defecation through the use of a training manual and anatomical drawings.

Dietary Supplement:
• Fiber supplements
Patients and caregivers will be taught to use fiber supplements to normalize stool consistency if patient reports diarrhea or constipation. Fiber supplements will be in the form of Metamucil beginning with 3.4 grams per day and increasing up to 13.6 grams per day if needed to control stool consistency.

Drug:
• Laxatives or anti-diarrheals
Miralax at a dose of one packet (17 grams) daily may be used for constipation if unresponsive to fiber. Dose may be titrated up to two packets (34 grams) daily if needed. Imodium at a starting dose of 2 mg/day may be used for diarrhea if unresponsive to fiber. Dose of Imodium may be titrated down to 1 mg or up to 4 mg if needed.

Behavioral:
• Pelvic floor muscle exercises
Patients will be taught how to perform pelvic floor muscle contractions during digital rectal examination by a nurse. They will be asked to squeeze 100 times daily.
• Tips on how to prevent fecal incontinence
Examples of behavioral tips are "Walk, don't run to the toilet" and "Squeeze before you lift objects or sneeze".
• Daily diary
Both groups will keep a daily diary, but amount of detail differs: Active comparator group records bowel accidents, bowel movements, Bristol Stool ratings of stool consistency, number of times they do pelvic floor exercises, study medications, and comments for the nurse to read. Placebo comparator group records only bowel accidents, bowel movements, and Bristol Stool scores.

Other:
• Protective pads or garments
In both groups, patients will be permitted to use pads or protective garments to avoid embarrassment. They will be told that fecal leakage that is stopped by a pad or protective garment should still be recorded as fecal incontinence.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill	Chapel Hill	North Carolina

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill	Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Cognitive Status at End of Treatment	OASIS question M1700: Cognitive functioning: Patient's current (day of assessment) level of alertness, orientation, comprehension, concentration, and immediate memory for simple commands. Measure as treatment moderator. Response categories are: 0 - Alert/oriented, able to focus and shift attention, comprehends and recalls task directions independently.; - Requires prompting (cuing, repetition, reminders) only under stressful or unfamiliar conditions.; - Requires assistance and some direction in specific situations (e.g., on all tasks involving shifting of attention), or consistently requires low stimulus environment due to distractibility.; - Requires considerable assistance in routine situations. Is not alert and oriented or is unable to shift attention and recall directions more than half the time.; - Totally dependent due to disturbances uch as constant disorientation, coma, persistent vegetative stte, or delirium.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Other	Change in Ambulation From Baseline to End of Treatment	OASIS question M1860: Ambulation/locomotion: Current ability to walk safely, once in a standing position, or use a wheelchair, once in a seated position, on a variety of surfaces. Measure as a moderator of treatment effects. Responses: 0. Able to independently walk on even and uneven surfaces and negotiate stairs with or without railings (i.e., needs no human assistance or assistive device).; Requires use of a device (e.g., cane, walker) to walk alone or requires human supervision or assistance to negotiate stairs or steps or uneven surfaces.; Able to walk only with the supervision or assistance of another person at all times.; Chairfast, unable to ambulate but is able to wheel self independently.; Chairfast, unable to ambulate and is unable to wheel self.; Bedfast, unable to ambulate or be up in a chair.; Higher scores represent improvement in ability to ambulate.	Baseline, End of Treatment (Week 6)
Other	Ability to Reach Toilet at End of Treatment	OASIS question M1840: Toilet transferring: Current ability to get to and from the toilet or bedside commode safely and transfer on and off toilet/commode. Measure as moderator of treatment outcomes.; A lower score is better.; Responses: 0. Able to get to and from the toilet and transfer independently with or without a device.; When reminded, assisted, or supervised by another person, able to get to and from the toilet.; Unable to get to and from the toilet but is able to use a bedside commode (with or without assistance).; Unable to get to and from the toilet or bedside commode but is able to use a bedpan/urinal independently.; Is totally dependent in toileting.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Other	When is Patient Anxious at End of Treatment?	OASIS question M1720: When anxious (reported or observed within the last 14 days). Measured as moderator of treatment effects on ordinal scale. Higher scores indicate a greater level of anxiousness. Responses are: 0 - None of the time; - Less often than daily; - Daily, but not constantly; - All of the time	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Other	Depression Screening at End of Treatment	OASIS question M1730: Depression Screening. Measure as a moderator of treatment effectiveness on categorical scale. Possible responses are: 0= No screening; Screened for depression with PHQ2 measure; Screened with PHQ2 and meets criteria for further evaluation of depression; Screened and does not meet criteria for further evaluation of depression	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Other	Patient's Living Situation at End of Treatment	OASIS question M1100: Patient living situation: This is a measure that combines who lives with the patient and the frequency that assistance is available to them throughout the day. Responses are coded on a 1-15 scale. Measure this as a moderator of treatment effectiveness.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Other	Caregiver's Ability and Willingness to Assist With ADLs at End of Treatment	OASIS question M2100, item A: Types and sources of assistance for ADLs. Measure as moderator of treatment effectiveness. Responses range from "No assistance needed in this area" to "Assistance needed, but no Caregivers available". Ordinal scale with 6 levels: 0= No assistance needed; Caregiver provides assistance; Caregiver needs training or support; Caregiver is unlikely to provide assistance; Unclear if caregiver will assist patient; Assistance is needed but is not available	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Primary	Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) at End of Treatment	At the end of treatment, the FISI requires the patient to report the frequency of occurrence of 4 types of fecal incontinence (solid, liquid, mucus, and gas incontinence) in the past month. These four responses are multiplied by empirically derived patient weights and the values are added together. Range of scores is 0-61. Higher scores show more severe fecal incontinence.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Primary	Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) at Follow-Up (FU)	At follow up 6 months after the end of treatment, the subject reports the frequency of occurrence of 4 types of fecal incontinence (solid, liquid, mucus, and gas incontinence) in the past month. These four responses are multiplied by empirically derived patient weights and the values are added together. Range is 0-61. No data is available to interpret the scale as mild, moderate, or severe fecal incontinence.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	Adequate Relief of Fecal Incontinence at End of Treatment	At the end of treatment, the subject is asked, "Compared to before you started home health care, have you experienced adequate relief of your fecal incontinence symptoms? [Responses: yes or no]". A responder is anyone answering yes. A treatment would be judged successful if there was at least 10% more responders in the active compared to the control groups.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	Adequate Relief of Fecal Incontinence at Follow Up	At follow up 6 months after the end of treatment, the subject is asked, "Compared to before you started home health care, have you experienced adequate relief of your fecal incontinence symptoms? [Responses: yes or no]". A responder to treatment is a subject who answers "yes". When applied to group analysis, a treatment is regarded as effective if the responder rate is at least 10% greater in the active treatment arm compared to the control arm. This measure is not recorded at baseline because it is undefined until treatment has been provided.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	MHQ Severity Scale at End of Treatment	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. Severity is one of 8 MHQ subscales. This subscale has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater severity of QOL impact.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Severity Scale at Follow Up	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater impact on quality of life.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale at End of Treatment	Validated questionnaire developed to assess the psychosocial and health burden experienced by a family caregiver of the identified patient. The 22-items ask about behaviors and feelings of caregivers on a 6-step ordinal scale (never to almost always). The scale is valid for caregivers of individuals with diverse chronic disabilities (dementia, advanced cancer, acquired brain injury). The scale has good internal consistency. Total scores range 0-66, and 21 or greater is interpreted as high burden (J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:535-42). Subscales (role and personal strain) have been described but are unreliable so total scores were used.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale at Follow Up	Validated questionnaire developed to assess the psychosocial and health burden experienced by a family caregiver of the identified patient. The total score range is from 0 to 66. Higher scores indicate greater severity of burden on the family.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	Fecal Incontinence Frequency at End of Treatment	OASIS question M1620: Bowel incontinence frequency. Response options are: 0 - Very rarely or never has bowel incontinence; - Less than once weekly; - One to three times weekly; - Four to six times weekly; - On a daily basis; - More often than once daily	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	Urinary Incontinence Status Change From Baseline to End of Treatment	OASIS question M1610: Urinary incontinence or urinary catheter presence. Response options are: 0 - No incontinence or catheter (includes anuria or ostomy for urinary drainage); - Patient is incontinent; - Patient requires a urinary catheter (i.e., external, indwelling, intermittent, suprapubic)	Baseline, end of treatment (week 6)
Secondary	Admission to Nursing Home at End of Treatment	Was patient admitted to a nursing home for one or more days at any time between enrollment and follow-up 7-8 months after treatment onset.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Incontinence Impact at End of Treatment	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Incontinence Impact at Follow Up	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	MHQ Role Limitations at End of Treatment	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Role Limitations at Follow Up	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	MHQ Physical Limitations at End of Treatment	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Physical Limitations at Follow Up	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	MHQ Social Limitations at End of Treatment	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Social Limitations at Follow Up	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	MHQ Personal Relationships at End of Treatment	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Personal Relationships at Follow Up	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	MHQ Emotions at End of Treatment	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Emotions at Follow Up	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends
Secondary	MHQ Sleep Energy at End of Treatment	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	End of Treatment (Week 6)
Secondary	MHQ Sleep Energy at Follow Up	Quality of life scale specific to fecal incontinence. This is one of 8 subscales. This subscale has a range of 0-100, with higher scores signifying greater impairment in quality of life.	6 months after (6-Week) treatment ends