Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Changes in CONFbal - GREEK score questionnaire |
The CONFbal questionnaire is a tool that assesses the self-esteem of an elderly person associated with the risk of falling. It consists of a 10-item scale, which are summed to give an index of balance confidence. The score ranges from 10 to 30. A higher score indicates lower balance confidence. ?he questionnaire demonstrates excellent internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability. The Greek version of the questionnaire CONFbal - GREEK (Billis, et al., 2011) will be used in this study. |
Pre-treatment, Month 6, 12 |
|
Primary |
Changes in Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (Short FES-I) score questionnaire |
Short FES-I is a measure of "fear of falling" or, more properly, "concerns about falling", which are suitable for use in research and clinical practice. It is the short version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), comprised of seven questions and is more applicable in clinical practice. The score ranges from 7 to 28. A higher score indicates greater fear of falling. The Greek version of the questioner (Billis, et al., 2011) will be used in this study |
Pre-treatment, Month 6, 12 |
|
Primary |
Changes in 4-Stage Balance Scale test |
The 4-Stage Balance Test is an assessment of static balance in four different and increasingly challenging positions - feet together, instep of foot advanced to toe of other foot, foot in front of other foot (tandem), and single leg stance (Lajoie & Gallagher, 2004). The participant must stand in each position for ten seconds, while the examiner tracks time using a stopwatch. Each of the first three positions is evaluated with the eyes open and closed, while the single leg stance is evaluated only with the eyes open, so each participant is evaluated in a total of seven tests. Each test is scored from four to zero (representing "able to stand for 10 seconds safely" and "needs help to keep from falling" respectively). The final score results from the sum of all seven tests and ranges from zero to 28. A higher score indicates greater static balance ability of the participant. The test has good validity (Marques et al., 2017). |
Pre-treatment, Month 6, 12 |
|
Primary |
Changes in Timed Up and Go test |
It is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility. It requires both static and dynamic balance and is a valid and reliable indicator of the functional ability of an individual (Podsiadlo & Richardson). The participant starts in a seated position. They then stand up following the instructions of the therapist, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down. The examiner tracks time using a stopwatch. Time is calculated in seconds. A higher score indicates lower functional ability of the participant. |
Pre-treatment, Month 6, 12 |
|
Primary |
Changes in number of falls |
Changes in number of falls will be evaluated through a Falls diary which will be completed each month by the elderly |
Pre-treatment, Month 6, 12 |
|
Primary |
Changes in the 30-Second Chair Stand Test |
The 30-Second Chair Stand Test is a test for assessing leg strength and endurance in elderly adults. It is part of the Stop Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) tool kit, which was created by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a screening tool for seniors belonging in the high fall risk group (Stevens, 2013). The test measures the number of times an elderly person can get up from a chair with their arms crossed in front of their trunk (on the opposite shoulder crossed at the wrists) in 30sec. This test was developed to overcome the floor effect of the five or ten repetition sit to stand test in older adults. The test has been characterized by excellent test-retest reliability in a total number of participants: r = 0.89 (95% Confidence interval 0.79-0.93) (Rikli & Jones, 1999). |
Pre-treatment, Month 6, 12 |
|
Primary |
Changes in Berg Balance scale Test |
The Berg Balance Scale is a tool proposed by Berg (Berg et al., 1989; Berg et al., 1992) for assessing balance in the elderly. The test involves the execution of 14 tests of gradual increasing difficulty where in each one, the subject is asked to maintain a given position for a specific time or conduct specific tasks. Each of the 14 tests on the list is graded according to the balancing ability of the examinee from 0 to 4 points (with 0 indicating low balance ability, while 4 indicates high balance ability). According to Berg et al. (1992), a score of 56 indicates functional balance, whereas a score lower than 45 indicates notable balance deficits that have been related to increased fall risk. Studies have shown high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in the elderly populations with intraclass correlation (ICC) ranging from .98 to .88 (Berg et al. 1992) and high content validity (Telenius et al., 2015). |
Pre-treatment, Month 6, 12 |
|
Secondary |
Changes in adherence to exercise via Exercise Diary keeping |
After the 6 months intervention period the participants of both groups will be asked to continue to perform the specific exercise programs three times per week for a period of six months recording the adherence or not to the exercise programs in a weekly diary while the assessor will collect the data by phone 2-3 times a month. |
Month 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
|