Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02418858
Other study ID # IRB # 14BN146
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
First received March 24, 2015
Last updated October 8, 2015
Start date February 2015
Est. completion date June 2017

Study information

Verified date October 2015
Source St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings and intra-operative test stimulation. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be awake during the procedure.


Description:

Traditional DBS is performed without general anesthesia with the patient awake. Local anesthetic is used to numb the skin and tissue where the incision is made, and the patients are given mild sedatives to alleviate anxiety and discomfort. Essential tremor (ET) patients undergo intra-operative test stimulation to refine the lead location and ensure the absence of sustained side effects. This can result in multiple brain penetrations during lead placement, and the entire procedure may last anywhere from 4-6 hours on average. The concept of being awake during brain surgery provokes significant anxiety and fear in some patients.

Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings and intra-operative test stimulation. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be awake during the procedure.

If asleep DBS produces clinical results equivalent to awake DBS surgery, the possible advantages include shorter surgical time, improved patient comfort, better access to DBS for patients, and cost savings for the hospital.

To date (August 2011 - September 2014), 157 patients have undergone asleep DBS surgery and 141 patients have undergone traditional awake DBS surgery. ET patients constitute 76 of the total surgeries - 50 patients underwent awake surgery and 26 underwent asleep surgery. The safety and efficacy of the two approaches to DBS surgery have been equivalent, and we are at a position of equipoise with regard to what to offer to patients. To date, there have been no randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy and functional outcomes of the two DBS methods for patients with the diagnosis of Essential tremor. The purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate that the functional outcomes of the "asleep" technique are not inferior to those reported for traditional "awake" DBS technique. The primary data points for this study will include three month functional outcomes using accepted outcome metrics for ET, including an objective tremor rating scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), a tremor Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire (Bain and Findley Tremor ADL scale), and a tremor quality of life questionnaire : Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire [QUEST]). Parkinson Meter and Life Pulse tremor readings (two iPhone accelerometer applications) will also be collected. . Patients who elect to participate in this trial will undergo a routine pre-operative neurocognitive evaluation consisting of the following routine evaluative tests: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2nd Edition, Wechsler Abbreviate Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition; Wechsler Memory Scale 3rd edition, Digit Span, Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Boston Naming Test, Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition, Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised, Hooper visual Organization Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Epworth Sleepiness Scale. The subjects will then be randomized to 2 groups by using random numbers in an envelope system. We anticipate that 120 total patients will need to be enrolled in this pilot study (60 awake, 60 asleep), and thus the numbers 1-120 will be placed in envelopes. An odd number will correspond to the awake DBS procedure, and an even number will indicate an asleep DBS procedure. The null hypothesis is that asleep DBS results in inferior tremor ratings 3-months after surgery when compared to awake DBS. Our secondary aim will be to evaluate any cognitive changes associated with DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) in ET patients. Current standard of care for patient selection in DBS focuses primarily on the evaluation of motor symptoms and currently there is no guidance for how a patients' DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) would impact on subsequent neurocognitive function.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date June 2017
Est. primary completion date December 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 85 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Essential Tremor diagnosed by criteria listed in the Consensus statement of the Movement Disorders Society on Tremor

- Age 18 - 85 years of age

- Motor skills allowing for capability to complete evaluations

- Medically cleared for undergoing anesthesia and DBS surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

- Dementia per DSM-V criteria

- Medical or other condition precluding MRI

- History of supraspinal CNS disease other than Essential Tremor

- Alcohol use of more than 4 drinks per day

- Pregnancy

- History of suicide attempt

- Currently uncontrolled clinically significant depression (BDI>20)

- History of schizophrenia, delusions, or currently uncontrolled visual hallucinations

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Deep Brain Stimulation surgery
Deep Brain Stimulation surgery awake vs. asleep

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix Arizona

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (11)

Alexander E 3rd, Kooy HM, van Herk M, Schwartz M, Barnes PD, Tarbell N, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Magnetic resonance image-directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy. J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):271-6. — View Citation

Bain PG, Findley LJ, Atchison P, Behari M, Vidailhet M, Gresty M, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Marsden CD. Assessing tremor severity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Aug;56(8):868-73. — View Citation

Burchiel KJ, McCartney S, Lee A, Raslan AM. Accuracy of deep brain stimulation electrode placement using intraoperative computed tomography without microelectrode recording. J Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;119(2):301-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.JNS122324. Epub 2013 May 31. — View Citation

Elble R, Bain P, Forjaz MJ, Haubenberger D, Testa C, Goetz CG, Leentjens AF, Martinez-Martin P, Pavy-Le Traon A, Post B, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Weintraub D, Schrag A. Task force report: scales for screening and evaluating tremor: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2013 Nov;28(13):1793-800. doi: 10.1002/mds.25648. Epub 2013 Sep 3. Review. — View Citation

Flora ED, Perera CL, Cameron AL, Maddern GJ. Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1550-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23195. Review. — View Citation

Kooy HM, van Herk M, Barnes PD, Alexander E 3rd, Dunbar SF, Tarbell NJ, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Mar 30;28(5):1229-34. — View Citation

Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Markun LC, Grace JK, Martin AJ, Starr PA, Larson PS. Clinical outcomes of PD patients having bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;115(6):708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 1. — View Citation

Papanastassiou V, Rowe J, Scott R, Silburn P, Davies L, Aziz T. Use of the Radionics Image Fusiontrade mark and Stereoplantrade mark programs for target localization in functional neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 1998 Jan;5(1):28-32. — View Citation

Pezeshkian P, DeSalles AA, Gorgulho A, Behnke E, McArthur D, Bari A. Accuracy of frame-based stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging vs frame-based stereotactic head computed tomography fused with recent magnetic resonance imaging for postimplantation deep brain stimulator lead localization. Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(6):1299-306. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b7069. — View Citation

Tröster AI, Pahwa R, Fields JA, Tanner CM, Lyons KE. Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST): development and initial validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005 Sep;11(6):367-73. — View Citation

Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Reda D, Moy CS, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Heemskerk J, Huang GD; CSP 468 Study Group. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.929. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Tremor Reduction Parkinson Meter and Life Pulse tremor readings will be collected for comparison to preoperative scores. 12 weeks post-operatively No
Primary Functional Outcomes The primary data points for this study will include three month functional outcomes using accepted outcome metrics for ET, including an objective tremor rating scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), a tremor ADL questionnaire (Bain and Findley Tremor ADL scale) for comparison to preoperative scores. 12 weeks post-operatively No
Primary Quality of Life Assessment Quality of life in Essential Tremor [QUEST] questionnaire will be collected again for comparison to preoperative scores. 12 week post-operatively No
Secondary Neurocognitive Function Neurocognitive evaluation consisting of the following routine evaluative tests: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2nd Edition, Wechsler Abbreviate Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition; Wechsler Memory Scale 3rd edition, Digit Span, Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Boston Naming Test, Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition, Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised, Hooper visual Organization Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease, Apathy Evaluation Scale; Epworth Sleepiness Scale. 6 months post-operatively No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT05381688 - VIM DBS Respiratory Modulation: N-of-1 Trial
Recruiting NCT05101161 - Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes N/A
Completed NCT02277106 - Evaluate SAGE-547 in Participants With Essential Tremor Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05769933 - Bridging Gaps in the Neuroimaging Puzzle: New Ways to Image Brain Anatomy and Function in Health and Disease Using Electroencephalography and 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Terminated NCT02678429 - Atlas Predicted DBS Settings in Essential Tremor N/A
Terminated NCT02894567 - Evaluation of Directional Recording and Stimulation Using spiderSTN N/A
Completed NCT02523807 - Tremor Monitoring Device N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02255929 - Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Treatment of Essential Tremor N/A
Completed NCT01223144 - Decision-making and Emotion Recognition in Essential Tremor N/A
Completed NCT00906412 - Ventrointermediate Nucleus (VIM DBS) and Working Memory N/A
Recruiting NCT05214222 - Penpulimab Plus Chemotherapy With/Without Anlotinib for Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Phase 2
Completed NCT03051178 - Wearable Sensor for Responsive DBS for ET N/A
Recruiting NCT03795935 - Relief From Side Effects: Clinical Use of Electrodes With Direction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06036368 - Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Peroneal Transcutaneous NeuroModulation in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor N/A
Recruiting NCT05897775 - Coordinated Reset Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05968976 - Multicentre RCT of Awake Versus Asleep Tractography Based DBS for ET N/A
Completed NCT06314139 - Tolerability and Efficacy of Continuous Theta-burst Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Study. N/A
Recruiting NCT04501133 - Sensory-specific Peripheral Stimulation for Tremor Management N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03560622 - Functional Neuroimaging Feedback for Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy N/A
Completed NCT00368199 - Transcranial Duplex Scanning and Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography (SPECT) in Parkinsonian Syndromes N/A