Erythema Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Single Center, Randomized, Split Body and Split Face, Double-Blinded, Multiple Sun Exposure Evaluation of Sunscreens of SPF 50+ and Above Under Actual Use Conditions
Verified date | December 2019 |
Source | Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a randomized, double-blinded, single-center, split body and split face, multiple natural sunlight exposure evaluation of two marketed sunscreens under actual use conditions in healthy volunteers. Eligible subjects will be randomized to two treatment randomization groups: Left SPF (Sun Protection Factor) 100+/Right SPF 50+ or Left SPF 50+/Right SPF 100+. Assessment of erythema and pigmentation will be performed at baseline and after all natural sunlight exposure periods which will occur on at the same beach location over the course of 5 consecutive days. Subjects will be suspended from further natural light exposure periods following the observation of sunburn at any exposed body site.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 55 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | June 1, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female - 18-60 years old - Phototypes I, II and III according to Fitzpatrick's classification - Be willing to not apply any topical products (face/body) and cleanse (face/body) each morning prior to study visit. - Be willing to use study test products in place of current sun protection topical skincare products (this includes make-up) during study hours. - Be willing to have 1x1 cm sites marked on your skin. A total of 12 sites will be marked including four on the face. Face sites will be marked by the corners only. - Be willing to refrain from using other sunscreen products, excessive sun exposure or tanning beds outside of the study visits. - Be willing to refrain from using new face/body cleanser products and brands cannot be switched during the study. - Be willing to refrain from using any new personal care products (e.g. makeup) or changing existing brands during the study. - Be willing to not shave or use any hair removal method on your face/body within the 24 hours prior to first study visit and for the study duration. Exclusion Criteria: - Individuals with known allergies or sensitivities to sunscreens or common topical skincare products. - Presence of sunburn (i.e. clinical erythema score greater than 0), suntan, scars, tattoos, active dermal lesions, dysplastic nevi, uneven skin tone, damaged/broken skin, or excessive body hair* on the areas of skin to be evaluated. The presence of nevi (other than dysplastic nevi), blemishes, or moles is acceptable if, in the investigator's judgment, they will not compromise the study and will not jeopardize the subject's safety. Beach umbrellas are not permitted. Sunglasses are acceptable. - *Hair is permitted to cover the back of the neck but long hair should be pulled into a ponytail leaving ears uncovered for Visits 2-6. - Presence of excessive pigmentation (pre-existing sun tan) or photodamage on the exposure sites to be evaluated. - Notable bilateral pigmentation discrepancies between the matched left and right side exposure sites (e.g., left arm more pigmented that right arm). - For study day mornings, Subject has applied, and refuses to remove prior to acclimation, any topical products (face/body) to the areas of skin to be evaluated. - Individuals with CONTROLLED health conditions. These individuals may be included in the study at the discretion of the PI: - Subjects with conditions that do not affect the skin, such as hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, could be enrolled when their health condition is managed through diet, medication, etc. - Subjects with conditions, which might affect the skin, such as hyper/hypothyroidism, diabetes must be excluded, regardless whether their health condition is controlled or not. - Subjects who are taking medication for chronic conditions (e.g., insulin, antihistamines, steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, etc...) - exception could be made for hypercholesterolemia as per point VI. - Individuals with any disease or condition of the skin including photosensitivity disorders (e.g., active [i.e. flaring] eczema or psoriasis, skin cancer, polymorphic light eruption (PMLE), systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), xeroderma pigmentosa) that could interfere with the study or increase risk to the subject. - Subjects who are taking medication for chronic conditions that may make a subject more sun sensitive (e.g., Tetracyclines, antifungals, certain diuretics, etc.) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide |
Kohli I, Nicholson CL, Williams JD, Lyons AB, Seo I, Maitra P, Tian X, Atillasoy E, Lim HW, Hamzavi IH. Greater efficacy of SPF 100+ sunscreen compared to SPF 50+ in sunburn prevention during five consecutive days of sunlight exposure: A Randomized, Doubl — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Mean bilateral sunburn comparison over matched exposure sites and sun exposure periods | The clinical evaluator assessed exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure . Clinical evaluation assessed erythema via a side-by-side comparison of the three exposure areas (matched sites) utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = Subject's Left side noticeably more sunburned than right side; 0 = No difference in sunburn; R1 = Subject's Right side noticeably more sunburned than left side | Days 1-7 | |
Primary | Mean erythema scores over exposure areas and exposure periods, calculated separately for the left and right sides of the body/face | Clinical evaluator independently assessed each side of each exposure area for erythema utilizing the erythema assessment score. Erythema score for each of the 6 exposure areas utilizing a scale of 0-4 with permission for intermediate (half-point) grades ( 0 = no burn; 1 = possible burn, not clearly defined; 2 = defined redness clearly caused by UV; 3 = severe sunburn with pronounced redness; 4 = edema and blisters). | Days 1-7 | |
Secondary | Clinical evaluation of bilateral sunburn (erythema) comparison by exposure site and exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure . Clinical evaluation assessed erythema via a side-by-side comparison of the three exposure areas (matched sites) utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = Subject's Left side noticeably more sunburned than right side; 0 = No difference in sunburn; R1 = Subject's Right side noticeably more sunburned than left side). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean clinically evaluated bilateral sunburn (erythema) comparison per subject by exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed subject for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. Clinical evaluation assessed erythema via a side-by-side comparison of the three exposure areas (matched sites) utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = Subject's Left side noticeably more sunburned than right side; 0 = No difference in sunburn; R1 = Subject's Right side noticeably more sunburned than left side). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean clinically evaluated bilateral sunburn (erythema) comparison over exposure period by matched exposure site. | The clinical evaluator assessed subject for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. Clinical evaluation assessed erythema via a side-by-side comparison of the three exposure areas (matched sites) utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = Subject's Left side noticeably more sunburned than right side; 0 = No difference in sunburn; R1 = Subject's Right side noticeably more sunburned than left side). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Clinically evaluated erythema score by exposure site and exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed each of the 6 exposure sites separately for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema. The erythema score was based on a 0-4 scale with permission for intermediate (half-point) grades (0=no burn, 1=Possible burn, not clearly defined, 2= Defined redness clearly caused by UV, 3= Severe sunburn with pronounced redness, 4= Edema and blisters). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in clinically evaluated erythema score by exposure site and exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed each of the 6 exposure sites separately for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. The erythema score was based on a 0-4 scale with permission for intermediate (half-point) grades (0=no burn, 1=Possible burn, not clearly defined, 2= Defined redness clearly caused by UV, 3= Severe sunburn with pronounced redness, 4= Edema and blisters). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean clinically evaluated erythema score per subject by exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed each subject for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. The erythema score was based on a 0-4 scale with permission for intermediate (half-point) grades (0=no burn, 1=Possible burn, not clearly defined, 2= Defined redness clearly caused by UV, 3= Severe sunburn with pronounced redness, 4= Edema and blisters). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean change from baseline in clinically evaluated erythema score per subject by exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed each subject for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. The erythema score was based on a 0-4 scale with permission for intermediate (half-point) grades (0=no burn, 1=Possible burn, not clearly defined, 2= Defined redness clearly caused by UV, 3= Severe sunburn with pronounced redness, 4= Edema and blisters). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean clinically evaluated erythema score over exposure periods by matched exposure site | The clinical evaluator assessed each of the 6 matched exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. The erythema score was based on a 0-4 scale with permission for intermediate (half-point) grades (0=no burn, 1=Possible burn, not clearly defined, 2= Defined redness clearly caused by UV, 3= Severe sunburn with pronounced redness, 4= Edema and blisters). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean change from baseline in clinically evaluated erythema score over exposure periods by matched exposure site. | The clinical evaluator assessed each of the 6 matched exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. The erythema score was based on a 0-4 scale with permission for intermediate (half-point) grades (0=no burn, 1=Possible burn, not clearly defined, 2= Defined redness clearly caused by UV, 3= Severe sunburn with pronounced redness, 4= Edema and blisters). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean clinically evaluated bilateral pigmentation (melanogenesis) comparison by exposure site and exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced erythema 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure . Clinical evaluation assessed erythema via a side-by-side comparison of the three exposure areas (matched sites) utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = Subject's Left side noticeably more sunburned than right side; 0 = No difference in sunburn; R1 = Subject's Right side noticeably more sunburned than left side). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean clinically evaluated bilateral pigmentation (melanogenesis) comparison over matched exposure sites and exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed each of the 3 matched exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. Clinical evaluation assessed pigmentation by side-by-side comparison of each of the three exposed areas utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = subject's left side noticeably more pigmented than right side; 0 = no difference in pigmentation; R1 = Subject's right side noticeably more pigmented than left side). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean bilateral pigmentation (melanogenesis) comparison per subject by exposure period. | The clinical evaluator assessed each subject for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure Clinical evaluation assessed pigmentation by side-by-side comparison of each of the three exposed areas utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = subject's left side noticeably more pigmented than right side; 0 = no difference in pigmentation; R1 = Subject's right side noticeably more pigmented than left side) for each subject. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean bilateral pigmentation (melanogenesis) comparison over exposure periods by matched exposure site. | The clinical evaluator assessed each of the 3 matched exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure. Clinical evaluation assessed pigmentation by side-by-side comparison of each of the three exposed areas utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = subject's left side noticeably more pigmented than right side; 0 = no difference in pigmentation; R1 = Subject's right side noticeably more pigmented than left side). | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Bilateral pigmentation (melanogenesis) comparison on Day 7 by matched exposure sites as well as per subject | The clinical evaluator assessed each of the 3 matched exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure . Clinical evaluation assessed pigmentation by side-by-side comparison of each of the three exposed areas utilizing the bilateral comparison score (L1 = subject's left side noticeably more pigmented than right side; 0 = no difference in pigmentation; R1 = Subject's right side noticeably more pigmented than left side) for each subject. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean chromameter measurements ?L* ?a* ?b* scores by exposure site and over exposure period. | UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure was assessed via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean changes from baseline in chromameter measurements ?L* ?a* ?b* scores by exposure site and over exposure period. | UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure was assessed via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean chromameter measurement ?L* ?a* ?b* scores over exposure sites and exposure periods. | UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure was assessed via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean changes from baseline in chromameter measurement ?L* ?a* ?b* scores over exposure sites and exposure periods | UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure was assessed via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean chromameter measurements ?L* ?a* ?b* per subject by exposure period | UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure was assessed via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean changes from baseline in chromameter measurements ?L* ?a* ?b* per subject by exposure period. | UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure was assessed via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean chromameter measurements ?L* ?a* ?b* over exposure period by site. | UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure was assessed via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Mean change from baseline in chromameter measurements ?L* ?a* ?b* over exposure period by site. | UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure was assessed via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Chromameter measurements ?L*, ?a*, ?b* scores at Day 7 by matched exposure site as well as per subject. This analysis will include all subjects irrespective of the number of exposure periods. | The clinical evaluator assessed matched exposure sites for UV (SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreen) induced pigmentation response 12-24 hours after a period of sun exposure via chromameter measurements providing quantitative readings (L*, a*, b* values) of the skin color at each designated measurement site. | Days 3-7 | |
Secondary | Number of subjects suspended from subsequent sun light exposure due to sunburn, by exposure period and by sunscreen product that triggered the suspension. | Summary statistics will be presented along with a detailed data listing. | Days 3-7 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT04290273 -
Characterisation of the Time-course Response of UV-induced Erythema
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01659853 -
Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing CD07805/47 Gel 0.5% to Azelaic Acid Gel 15% in Subjects With Erythema of Rosacea
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00839462 -
Efficacy of Dexpanthenol in Thermic Erythema
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06016361 -
Evaluation of a Novel Amino Acid Based Moisturizing Cream as Part of the Daily Standard Skincare Regimen Recommended During Radiation Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03633877 -
Durapore vs. Hy-Tape to Secure The Endotracheal Tube
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02876107 -
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With or Without Panitumumab in Treating Patients With Invasive Triple Negative Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT06369675 -
Skin Irritation Potential of MOB015B in Healthy Subjects Using a Cumulative Irritant Patch Test Design
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03352323 -
An Evaluation of the Reduction in Erythema in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Facial Erythema Associated With Rosacea
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06369727 -
Study to Evaluate the Sensitizing Potential of MOB015B in Healthy Subjects Using a Repeat Insult Patch Test Design
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02832141 -
Effect of Thoracic Spine Mobilization on Sympathetic Nervous Systems
|
||
Completed |
NCT02131636 -
Efficacy and Safety of AGN-199201 in Patients With Persistent Erythema Associated With Rosacea
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01597921 -
A DB Randomized Study of R1 and R2 WaterJel / AloeVera Jell in Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01636765 -
Study of Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment Scale
|
||
Completed |
NCT01124513 -
Melanin Index in Those With Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes I-VI
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03496584 -
Effects of Phytonutrients on Vascular Health and Skin in Obese Males
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02737592 -
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety of a Personal Lubricant in Healthy Female Subjects
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03852563 -
A Study to Gain Information How Well Dexpanthenol Derma Cream Helps the Face Skin to Recover After Cosmetic Lasering
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05300542 -
Efficacy Study of a Novel Skin Health Product to Reduce an UVB Induced Erythema
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03477825 -
Pilot Study of Triphala and Rubia Cordifolia on Gut Microbiome and Skin
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02490943 -
A Pilot Study of Warm and Cold Compress to Reduce Injection Site Erythema Due to Peginterferon-beta-1a in MS
|
N/A |