Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03161717
Other study ID # MD14043 (RegionalStim?)
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received May 18, 2017
Last updated May 18, 2017
Start date March 11, 2015
Est. completion date March 2019

Study information

Verified date May 2017
Source Korea University Guro Hospital
Contact Chung Hun Lee, MD
Phone 82-2-2626-3240
Email bodlch@naver.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Forty pregnant women (36 to 41 weeks gestation) will randomly allocate to two groups. Groups will be defined based on the method used to identify the epidural space for epidural anesthesia: the loss of resistance group (n=20) and the epidural electrical stimulation group (n=20). Pain will be assessed using a numerical visual analog scale and maternal satisfaction by a post-partum interview. The success rate of epidural analgesia, maternal satisfaction, and neonatal Apgar scores will be compared between groups.


Description:

Investigators will place epidural catheter in the epidural space using loss of resistance technique, and will confirm correct placement of the epidural catheter using electrical stimulation.

Epidural catheter placement, electrical stimulation, and confirmation of response is followed:

Patients will be placed in the left lateral decubitus position. The site will be aseptically prepared and 1% lidocaine will be infiltrated to the skin. An 18-gauge Tuohy needle will be inserted midline of L4/5 interspinous space.

For the Loss of resistance (LOR) group, after identification of the epidural space, the Tuohy needle will be stopped, and a 20-gauge epidural catheter will be advanced through the Tuohy needle.

The same process will be followed for the Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) group. In addition, the epidural space will be confirmed by epidural electrical stimulation using a 20-gauge epidural catheter (RegionalStimTm, Sewoon Medical Co., Ltd, Seoul, Korea, 800 mm) with a conductive guidewire (conductive guidewire, Nitinol, 1100 mm).

After confirming there is no reverse flow of cerebrospinal fluid or blood with aspiration, 3 mL of 1% lidocaine, with 15 mcg of epinephrine (1:200000), will be injected through the epidural catheter as test dose. If there is no response to the test dose, patients will be moved to the delivery room. To control labor pain, a one-time injection containing 50 mcg of fentanyl, 3 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, and 6 mL of normal saline (total volume 10 mL) will be administered. A continuous infusion of 3 to 10 mL/hour depending on the patient's pain will be used of 75 mcg of fentanyl, 8.5 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, and 40 mL of normal saline (total volume 50 mL).

Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and neurologic assessment findings will be monitored up to 72 hours after labor.

Pain relief in labor is assessed by a change in the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. A 10 point VAS, where 0 is no pain and 10 is unbearable pain, is used to assess pain during labor. The scale is assessed before epidural anesthesia and after epidural anesthesia. Differences in the VAS response we used to assess the efficacy of the epidural anesthesia in decreasing labor pain. Comparison of the change in VAS between groups is used to compare pain control of the two methods. The success of epidural analgesia is defined by sensory block, without motor block, and a decrease in pain score after adequate dosing of epidural medication. Failure of epidural analgesia is defined by a lack of sensory block and a less that 2 point difference on the VAS after adequate dosing of epidural medications.

Patient satisfaction will be evaluated by a postpartum interview. Satisfaction is graded between a score of 1-5, where 1 represent very unsatisfied and 5 represent very satisfied. Patients will indicate a score of 1 to 5.

One- and 5-minute Apgar scores will be compared to assess the effect of epidural electrical stimulation on the neonate. Additional time required for epidural electrical stimulation will be determined by the difference (in seconds) from LOR to identification of the epidural space through electrical stimulation.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date March 2019
Est. primary completion date March 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 19 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients who were at 36 to 41 weeks' gestation and admitted in labor to the university clinic for vaginal delivery were included. Patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II, and were scheduled to receive epidural analgesia

Exclusion Criteria:

- Skin infection at the injection site

- Difficult catheter placement owing to previous lumbar spinal surgery or deformity

- Presence of a hemostatic disorder or use of antiplatelet therapy

- Injection of an analgesic within the previous 12 hours

- Presence of a cardiac pacemaker

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Epidural electrical stimulation (EES)
Using loss of resistance technique and electrical stimulation
Loss of resistance (LOR)
Using loss of resistance technique only

Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Korea University Guro Hospital Seoul

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Sang Sik Choi Sewoon Medical Co., Ltd

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

References & Publications (6)

Eappen S, Blinn A, Segal S. Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998 Oct;7(4):220-5. — View Citation

Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;109(2):144-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes214. Epub 2012 Jun 26. Review. — View Citation

Silva M, Halpern SH. Epidural analgesia for labor: Current techniques. Local Reg Anesth. 2010;3:143-53. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S10237. Epub 2010 Dec 8. — View Citation

Tsui BC, Gupta S, Finucane B. Confirmation of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jul;45(7):640-4. — View Citation

Tsui BC, Tarkkila P, Gupta S, Kearney R. Confirmation of caudal needle placement using nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1999 Aug;91(2):374-8. — View Citation

Wantman A, Hancox N, Howell PR. Techniques for identifying the epidural space: a survey of practice amongst anaesthetists in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2006 Apr;61(4):370-5. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Success rate of epidural analgesia Evaluation parameter : Accuracy comparison between loss of resistance and epidural electrical stimulation Up to 6 months
Secondary Maternal satisfaction Patient satisfaction will be evaluated by a postpartum interview. Satisfaction is graded between a score of 1-5, where 1 represent very unsatisfied and 5 represent very satisfied. Patients will indicate a score of 1 to 5 Up to 6 months
Secondary Neonatal Apgar score Assessment of neonatal Up to 6 months
Secondary Procedure-related complications Check allergy reaction of anesthetics or chlorohexidine
Check whether Insert of local anesthetics to intravascular or not
Up to 6 months
Secondary Minimum electrical current to elicit a response in the epidural electrical stimulation group Check stimulation strength that patients begin the feel for the first
Check the proper stimulation part of body
Up to 6 months
Secondary Additional time for epidural electrical stimulation Determined by the difference (in seconds) from loss of resistance(LOR) to identification of the epidural space through electrical stimulation Up to 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02516059 - Early Postoperative Administration of Oxycodone +/- Naloxone and Duration of Epidural Analgesia Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05543824 - Hemodynamic Impact of Epidural Anesthesia in Relation to Age in Pediatric Patients.
Completed NCT06393192 - The Post Cesarean Section Analgesic Effect of Various Quadratus Lumborum Block Approaches
Not yet recruiting NCT03314571 - Obstetrical Analgesia in the Estaing Hospital Maternity. A Prospective Database to Study the Determinants of Labor Pain and the Resulting Maternal Non Satisfaction. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02396563 - Effect of Epidural Analgesia on the Length of Labor and Delivery and Fetal Outcomes N/A
Recruiting NCT05898737 - Nociception Level Index (NOL Index) for Obstetrical Pain Assessment Under Epidural Analgesia.
Completed NCT06069219 - Pharmacokinetics of Sufentanil After Epidural Administration
Recruiting NCT04940091 - Epidural Analgesia and Maternal Fever During Labor
Completed NCT04397406 - Dexmedetomidine or Fentanyl as Additives to Epidural Levobupivacaine in Painless Labor Phase 4
Completed NCT04708080 - Effects of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery
Completed NCT03203967 - Epidural Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Terminated NCT04111406 - Comparison of the Incidence of Inadequate Epidural Analgesia Between Protocol Based and Current Practice N/A
Completed NCT03389945 - Different Spinal Needles Sizes and Dural Puncture Epidural For Labor Analgesia N/A
Completed NCT06301932 - The Effectiveness and Outcomes of Epidural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Hepatectomy
Recruiting NCT05812560 - Evaluation of a Protocol Posturalchanges in Women Giving Birth With Epidural Analgesia. Clinical Trial. N/A
Completed NCT03126136 - Pulse Pressure Variability With Position Before EPIdural Analgesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05534945 - PIB for Post-operative Analgesia After Laparotomy : Determining the Optimum Dose N/A
Completed NCT01437358 - Epidural Analgesia in Intensive Care Unit (APD-REA: Analgesie PeriDurale en REAnimation) N/A
Recruiting NCT05323214 - Comparative Study Between Two Adjuvant Drugs to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries Phase 4
Completed NCT03496194 - Anaesthesiological Involvement in Postoperative Pain Treatment