View clinical trials related to Endometrial Receptivity.
Filter by:Both controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and frozen embryo transfer has become an integral part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Fresh embryo transfer is usually performed by providing Luteal Phase Support (LPS) with progesterone after COS. Frozen embryo transfer (FET) is usually performed in artificial cycles with hormone replacement treatment (HRT), in which exogenous progesterone is administered, although it can also be performed in a Natural Cycle (without hormone supplementation) (NC). There is evidence that the supraphysiologic levels of estradiol and progesterone during COS+LPS and HRT could lead to morphologic and biochemical endometrial modifications, altering endometrial receptivity and lowering implantation and pregnancy rates. We hypothesize that the supraphysiologic hormone levels required for both COS+LPS, and HRT may be inducing alterations in endometrial composition and function, specifically the chronic accumulation of senescent cells; either due to an excessive hormonal induction, a lack of clearance due to a deficit of uNKs, or a combination of both, ultimately affecting both endometrial receptivity and decidualization, worsening IVF outcomes. The in vitro clearance of endometrial senescent cells by selective induction of apoptosis has been found to enhance the decidualization capacity of the rest of Endometrial Stromal Cells (EnSC), which could represent in a future adjuvant strategy to reduce the potentially deleterious effects of supraphysiologic hormone levels and improve reproductive outcomes in IVF patients. The results derived from this project would have a direct impact on clinical practice. First, the results would allow us to evaluate, based on experimental data, potential endometrial side effects of stimulation protocols commonly used in IVF treatments. In addition, in the case of finding a pathological accumulation of senescent cells affecting endometrial receptivity, we will be able to in vitro evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant senolytic (drugs designed to specifically remove senescent cells) compounds to in vitro improve the expression of endometrial receptivity markers, as a first step to demonstrate the effectiveness of their use in improving the reproductive outcomes of IVF patients.
After so many years conducting artificial endometrial preparation cycles for embryo transfer, there is no clear indication about which is the optimal dose of exogenous progesterone in this scenario to optimize the outcome. Taking into account that the luteal phase can be controlled by measuring serum P levels (not done until now), the next step is to find out which is the best dose and route of administration of exogenous progesterone for luteal phase in artificial cycles. Therefore, the aim of this experimental study is to compare the endometrial function and structure, as well as the serum P levels according to the use of different types of exogenous progesterone available on the market depending on their doses and route of administration (vaginal, subcutaneous or intramuscular). The endometrial receptivity status will be compared in the different artificial cycles with the one observed in a natural cycle, without exogenous progesterone (only the endogenous one) as a control group. Endometrial receptivity will be analysed by means of endometrial function and structure, but not by pregnancy outcome as in this study an embryo cannot be replaced in the uterus because an endometrial biopsy needs to be done to do this type of research.
In order to further explore the clinical utility of endometrial receptivity array in patients with repeated implantation failure, the patients divide into the experimental group or the control group. In the experimental group, those patients undergo endometrial receptivity array. In the control group, those patients do not receive any treatment before next cycle of transfer. In the experimental group, according to the results of endometrial receptivity array, the transplantation time will be adjusted and retransplantation will be carried out. Statistical analysis of the two groups of primary endpoint and secondary endpoint are done.