View clinical trials related to Endocarditis, Bacterial.
Filter by:Percutaneous pulmonary valve revalvulation (PPVR) has emerged as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of congenital heart disease with right ejection pathway dysfunction. The Melody valve (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) was the first to be used, validated in 2006 by the European Commission and in 2010 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Subsequently, the Sapien valve (Edwards SAPIEN pulmonic transcatheter heart valve, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) was subsequently approved for PPVR (Europe, 2010; FDA 2016). Infective endocarditis (IE) after PPVR is currently a major concern with an incidence after Melody PPVR estimated at 3%, much higher than the rate of prosthetic left-heart IE. The Sapien valve has been introduced more recently and some cases of IE have been published. Despite the attention this issue is receiving, there are few studies of sufficient size or statistical power to elucidate the risk factors for developing an IE after PPVR according to the type of valve implanted. Recently, a multicenter study was published by the American team of McElhinney et al (J Am Coll Cardiol 2021 ; 78 :575-589). Although it was a sizeable cohort (2476 patients), there was a large disparity in the ratio of patients who underwent revalvulation with either the Melody or Sapien valve, in favor of Melody patients (2038 Melody patients vs. 438 Sapien patients). In this study, the estimated risk of IE was higher for patients who received a Melody valve, according to univariable analysis but not anymore after multivariate analysis. To further answer this question, we develop an international retrospective multicenter registry whose main objective will be to characterize the incidence rate of infective endocarditis after percutaneous pulmonary revalvulation according to the type of valve implanted (Melody vs. Sapien) using a large population of patients with comparable characteristics (match-population).
1. To detect in more detail the incidence of infective endocarditis in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis. 2. To compare the relationship between different forms of haemodialysis access type and the related incidence of infective endocarditis. 3. To determine individual risk factors, including type of vascular haemodialysis access, previous valve lesion and immunocompromised patients.
Retrospective, regional, multicenter study (including the Annecy-Genevois Hospital Center, the Chambéry Métropole Savoie Hospital Center, and the Grenoble University Hospital Center), comparing a cohort of patients treated with Cefazolin with a cohort of patients treated with Penicillin M
This was a retrospective observational study of consecutive cases of definite or possible infective endocarditis (IE) as per the modified Duke criteria between January 2008 and December 2015, which was performed at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of medicine (SAHZU), a tertiary care referral hospital located in East China.
The hypothesis underlying this work is the identification of different sub phenotypes of patients with infective endocarditis through the study of the host's response to infection. Furthemore, metagenomic sequencing may be a helpful supplement to IE diagnostic, especially when conventional tests fail to yield a diagnosis.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication that occurs in 15 to 25% of patients after vascular surgery, and up to 40% of patients after cardiac surgery. AKI compromises seriously short and long-term prognosis of critically ill patients. Several AKI risk factors have been identified including a chronic pathology of the patient such as kidney failure or diabetes, acute kidney injury related to hemodynamic disorders during surgery, including cardiopulmonary bypass, or sepsis, and the use of nephrotoxic agents such as some antibiotics, colloids or iodine contrast agents. Avoiding nephrotoxic agents is therefore strongly recommended in ICU patients, to reduce the incidence of AKI, or to reduce its severity. The aim of this cohort study was to assess whether the use of daptomycin, was associated to a lower incidence of AKI than vancomycin in cardiovascular ICU patients, with similar efficacy. This is a retrospective observational study with a propensity score adjustment to reduce the bias of selection for a comparative analysis between two antibacterial treatments used in routine care. Since treatments were not randomized, the investigators used the propensity score method for primary endpoint analysis. For this, the investigators included the covariates potentially related to treatment and outcome in a multivariate logistic model explaining the choice of treatment. This propensity score was used in the second model as an adjustment covariate included in the multivariate analysis to determine factors independently associated with the primary endpoint (AKI within 7 days). The main hypothesis is the first line antibiotic treatment with daptomycin leads to less nephrotoxicity than vancomycin in a population known at high risk for AKI and with at least a similar efficacy on clinical success rate.
The study aims to investigate the effect of addition of an adsorber during cardio pulmonary bypassin patients with infective endocarditis undergoing valve surgery, and if it will decrease the use of vasoactive drugs postoperatively.
This study aims at studying the frequency of infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement/implantation
The clinical trial is designed as a phase II, crossover clinical trial. It will be carried out in healthy volunteers, who will receive two different antibiotic regimen based on ceftriaxone. One of the regimens had shown clinical effectiveness in this scenario, but it is not suitable for OPAT programs. In the other hand, a new treatment schema useful in OPAT programs is proposed, but there is still a lack of pharmacokinetic data to support it. The plasma drug concentrations will be measured in both cases, comparing the minimal drug concentration observed and the pharmacokinetic profiles of the two regimens.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare (30 cases / million / year in France) and serious disease (20 % of deaths during hospitalization and 40 % after 5 years). The development of an IE results from the meeting between a bacteremia and a pre-existent heart disorder, most of the time valvular, allowing the transplant of the circulating bacteria and their multiplication in the endocardium. Recommendations of prophylactic antibiotic treatment have been established since 1954 for some medical, particularly dental procedures, at the origin of bacteremia. But this policy has recently been questioned because its efficacy has not been demonstrated. The purpose of this study is identify the situations with risk, by comparing the oral health status and the hygiene of patients having an IE with oral streptococci to those in patients having an IE with microorganisms not of oral origin.