Empyema, Pleural Clinical Trial
Official title:
Management of Pleural Space Infections
Verified date | November 2022 |
Source | Swedish Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Currently, there is no high-quality evidence comparing the clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of surgical drainage combined with antibiotics versus dual-agent intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) catheter drainage of pleural space infections with concomitant antibiotic therapy. The absence of comparative data is a challenge for surgical and medical services in clinical decision-making for this common and morbid condition. This is a pilot study comparing surgical drainage of the pleural space in complex pleural effusions to bedside chest tube drainage using dual agent IPFT with the intent to inform on study algorithm and endpoint performance in anticipation of a multi-institutional randomized clinical trial.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 26 |
Est. completion date | March 11, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | March 11, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age >18 years - Clinical presentation compatible with pleural infection (fever or leukocytosis, elevated procalcitonin, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP)) - Pleural fluid requiring drainage that is either: - Macroscopically purulent or - Positive on culture for bacterial infection or - Positive for bacteria on gram stain or - Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 1000 IU/L or - Glucose <40 mg/dL Exclusion Criteria: - Age <18 years - Unable to give consent (No surrogate consent of legally authorized representatives allowed for this study) - Not proficient in English - History of prior ipsilateral empyema - Has known sensitivity to DNase or alteplase - History of intracranial hemorrhage or acute intracranial hemorrhage - History of stroke, hemorrhage, or trauma within the last 3 months - Has had prior surgery on the side of the pleural infection - Patients who are pregnant or lactating - Expected survival less than 6 months from a different pathology to this pleural infection based on clinical judgment - Has a tunneled pleural catheter in place - Patients on anticoagulation that cannot be interrupted for surgical intervention - Patients with known or suspected malignant pleural effusion - Patients with renal failure (Creatinine clearance <30) - Prior history of or concern for chylothorax or pseudochylothorax - Vulnerable populations: prisoners |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Swedish Cancer Institute | Seattle | Washington |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Swedish Medical Center |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Feasibility of the proposed study algorithm as measured by percent of subjects enrolled to study completion, percent of subjects randomized but did not complete the study, and percent of health care professional protocol deviation | • Test the feasibility of the proposed study algorithm to compare Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) to surgical intervention as measured by percent enrollment to completion of study algorithm and multidisciplinary participation in adherence to the algorithm. | From patient identification to 1 year post discharge | |
Primary | Subject identification and accrual as measured by the percent of patients not screened and randomized and the time to accrual of 20 patients of the number of patients accrued in one year | Subject identification and accrual as measured by the percent of patients not screened and randomized and the time to accrual of 20 patients of the number of patients accrued in one year | From patient identification to 1 year post discharge | |
Secondary | Radiographic improvement | Imaging will be posterior-anterior (PA) and lateral chest x-ray to determine radiographic change. Images will be saved and exported as JPEG files and opened in image editing software. Polygons will be drawn representing fluid collections and the hemithorax area covered will be calculated with the volume derived.
Change in fluid volume will be quantified as: Less than 50% Between 50-75% Greater than 75% Change of greater than 75% will be considered satisfactory improvement. Chest radiograph images will be reviewed and measured by two independent radiologists. If greater than 5% discrepancy in fluid volume change is reported, the independent radiologists will re-read and re-measure the images together. |
From date of protocol Image #1 (once the chest tube is placed, protocol image #1 is obtained within 24-48 hours) to date of protocol Image #2 (the morning after intervention, approximately 12-24 hours after intervention) | |
Secondary | Number of participants who have treatment failures needing further treatment crossover (IPFT to surgery; surgery to IPFT) | Treatment failures are defined as any patients with evidence of ongoing infection, persistently undrained pleural space and fever or elevated inflammatory markers still present at least 48 hours after completion of their intervention. Treatment failures will be treated at the discretion of the clinically responsible team, this may include but is not limited to study arm crossover. If a patient is a treatment failure and has treatment crossover (IPFT to surgery, surgery to IPFT), the data will documented with the data collection. | From patient identification to 1 year post discharge | |
Secondary | Number of participants with procedure related complications | Documented using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) | From intervention with IPFT or surgery to date of discharge from hospital, usually 7-10 days | |
Secondary | Quality of life Surveys: 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) | Quality of life will be measured at 30 day and 90 day clinical follow-up using the SF-36 quality of life survey. The SF-36 is a 36 question survey that assesses survey general health on a scale of 1-5 (1=excellent, 5=poor). In addition it assesses how current health limits activities such as walking, daily activities of bathing and dressing oneself. A higher score defines a more favorable health state. Each item is score on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Secondarily, the scores to each question are averaged in the groups in which they are categorized to create an 8 scale scores. The 8 scale categories are: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. | Quality of life will be measured at 30 day and 90 day clinical follow-up | |
Secondary | Cost comparison | Cost Comparison: As one of the secondary endpoints for the study, we will perform a cost comparison between the two study arms (IPFT and surgical drainage). Cost data will be obtained from billing data from the patient's hospital admission for stay and procedures related to the patients complicated pleural space infection. No billing data will be obtained directly from the participants in the study. | From date of intervention with IPFT or surgery to date of discharge from hospital, usually 7-10 days | |
Secondary | Chest tube duration | The length of time the chest tube is in the patient. The study algorithm governs chest tube removal parameters: Once it has been deemed that there is satisfactory improvement in imaging and no signs of ongoing infection, the chest tube will be removed per protocol. Criteria for removal: Fluid non purulent, serous in character, pleural drain output is less than 200 cc/24 hours | From date of initiation of intervention of IPFT or surgery (approximately 24-48 hours after patient identification) to date of removal of chest tube, approximately 7 days after placement depending on the intervention and the chest tube output. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05546762 -
Trial of Antiseptic Irrigation for Pleural Infection
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04477980 -
Retrospective Review on Patients With Culture Negative Empyema
|
||
Completed |
NCT06325904 -
Uniportal VATS Versus Chest Tube for Early Empyema
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05204537 -
The Role of Surgery in Patients With Coronavirus Disease - 19 (COVID-19) Related Thoracic Complications
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06427538 -
Chest Drain Regular Flushing in Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyemas
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03583931 -
Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion With Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus VATs Decortication
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02958683 -
Chest Wall Motion Analysis in Disease
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02165891 -
Comparison of Intrapleural Urokinase and Video-Assisted Thorascopic Surgery in the Treatment of Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion in Children
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01246453 -
Efficacy and Security of Intrapleurally Alteplase vs Urokinase for the Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion and Empyema
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03584113 -
VATS Decortication Versus IR Guided Chest Tube Insertion With Fibrinolytics for the Management of Empyema
|
N/A |