Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01785368
Other study ID # LOCAL/2012/PR-01
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 5, 2013
Last updated March 25, 2015
Start date October 2013
Est. completion date June 2014

Study information

Verified date March 2015
Source Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority France: Committee for the Protection of PersonnesFrance: The Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the implementation of referral guidelines for imaging exams requested by the emergency department on exam relevance. The latter is assessed via the rate of suspected diagnoses that are confirmed by the requested exam.


Description:

The secondary objectives of this study are to assess the impact of the implementation of referral guidelines for imaging exams requested by the emergency department on the following:

A. How exam results are classified in relation to the initial, suspected diagnosis.

B. Further aspects of exam relevance.

C. Delays associated with exams

D. Changes in practice in terms of type of examination, clinical situations, the number of tests ordered per patient, and emergency situations

E. Radiation and contrast agent exposures


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 8549
Est. completion date June 2014
Est. primary completion date June 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- The patient (or his/her guardian/parent/person-of-trust) was correctly informed about the study

- A participating ER doctor has requested an imaging exam for the patient during one of the trial observation periods (ie the "before" period or the "after" period).

Exclusion Criteria:

- The patient is under judicial protection

- The patient (or his/her guardian/parent/person-of-trust) refuses to participate in the study

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Health Services Research


Intervention

Other:
Implementation of guidelines
The participating ER doctors are required to request imaging exams for their patients according to a guide mutually constructed by the emergency and imaging departments of the Nîmes university hospital.
Baseline observation
During this period of the study, baseline data will be collected.

Locations

Country Name City State
France CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau Nîmes Cedex 09

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in the % of initial, suspected diagnoses that are confirmed positive by the requested exam Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the classification of exam results in relation to initial, suspected diagnosis Qualitative variable: (i) the suspected diagnosis is confirmed; (ii) the suspected diagnosis was not confirmed, the exam was normal; (iii) the suspected diagnosis was confirmed, and another unsuspected pathology was also found; (iv) the suspected diagnosis was not confirmed, and another unsuspected pathology was found.
Measured over an observation period of 1 month.
baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the % of requested exams that do not conform with the exam recommended by the implemented guidelines Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the positivity rate for each suspected diagnosis Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the % of exams performed identical to the exam requested Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the average delay between the time marked on the request and the exam. Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the average delay between the time marked on the request and the distribution of written exam results. Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the number of admissions in the emergency department Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the number of requests for imaging exams made by the emergency department Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the % of patients admitted to the emergency department and needing an imaging exam. Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the frequency of each type of exam carried out. Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the frequency of each type of clinical situation associated with imaging exams. Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the average number of imaging exams requested per patient Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the frequency of imaging exams requested per type of emergency situation vital; imaging needed in 4 - 6 hours; imaging needed in 6 to 24h, scheduled for hospitalisation, external demand, social requirements
Measured over an observation period of 1 month.
baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the % agreement between the clinical situation coded by the emergency doctor and the radiologist Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines No
Secondary Change in the total radiation exposure per patient Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines Yes
Secondary Change in the frequency of injection of contrast agents Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines Yes
Secondary Change in the frequency of patients requiring contrast agents AND whose exam results are classified as "the suspected diagnosis was not confirmed, exam normal" Measured over an observation period of 1 month. baseline (days 0 to 30) versus the 6th month after implementation of guidelines Yes